Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A sequence, a1=64, a2=66, a3=67, an=8+an-3, which of the following is in the sequence?

105 786 966 1025

can any one help me with this. Bhanu

786

Take each number subtract 64, 66 and 67 and test which of the remainders is a multiple of 8.

Is anyone sure if this is correct? i'm getting that 786 AND 966 would both be in the sequence. here is my reasoning:

the question stem gives "an=8+an-3" so: 64+8-3 = 69 66+8-3 = 71 67+8-3 = 72

In fact, we could simply each by just adding 5 to each subsequent number and we start seeing a pattern... 64,66,67,69,71,72,74,76, 77,79,81, (Please note the color scheme here)

You will notice that each number increases by 5 and always follows a units digit pattern.

so whatever the answer is, it must have a units digit that follows this pattern. Only 786 and 966 do. They follow the 66....1,6,1,6,1,6 pattern. furthermore, it should always follow...66, 71,76,81,86,91,96,101,106.........786.....966.

anyone able to verify the answer? Or maybe my reasoning is flawed somewhere. if anyone knows, please say. Thanks _________________

Re: Sequence question [#permalink]
15 Oct 2009, 08:13

azule45 wrote:

techjanson wrote:

bhanuvemula wrote:

A sequence, a1=64, a2=66, a3=67, an=8+an-3, which of the following is in the sequence?

105 786 966 1025

can any one help me with this. Bhanu

786

Take each number subtract 64, 66 and 67 and test which of the remainders is a multiple of 8.

Is anyone sure if this is correct? i'm getting that 786 AND 966 would both be in the sequence. here is my reasoning:

the question stem gives "an=8+an-3" so: 64+8-3 = 69 66+8-3 = 71 67+8-3 = 72

In fact, we could simply each by just adding 5 to each subsequent number and we start seeing a pattern... 64,66,67,69,71,72,74,76, 77,79,81, (Please note the color scheme here)

You will notice that each number increases by 5 and always follows a units digit pattern.

so whatever the answer is, it must have a units digit that follows this pattern. Only 786 and 966 do. They follow the 66....1,6,1,6,1,6 pattern. furthermore, it should always follow...66, 71,76,81,86,91,96,101,106.........786.....966.

anyone able to verify the answer? Or maybe my reasoning is flawed somewhere. if anyone knows, please say. Thanks

I suppose the question is : An = 8 + A (n-3) eg. A4 = 8 + A1; A5 = 8 + A2....

So any number that belongs to this sequence will be sum of one of 64/66/67 and some number of 8s.

105 - 64 = 41 which is not a multiple of 8. 41 is 1 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of 41 (in effect subtracting 66/67 out of 105), you will still not get a multiple of 8. Hence 105 is not in this sequence.

786 - 64 = 720 which is divisible by 8 hence it will be in the sequence. This is your answer and ideally you should stop here. But if you want to check the remaining two options:

966 - 64 = 902 which is not divisible by 8. Neither are 900 and 899. Or say that 902 is 6 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of it, you will still not get a multiple of 8.

1025 - 64 = 961 which is not divisible by 8 and is 1 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of it, it will still not give a multiple of 8. _________________

Note that the terms in the sequence have remainder of 0 (a_1, a_4, a_7, ...), 2 (a_2, a_5, a_8, ...) or 3 (a_3, a_6, a_9, ...) upon division by 8. Only 786 has appropriate remainder of 2 (105 and 1025 has a remainder of 1 upon division by 8 and 966 has a remainder of 6).

Note that the terms in the sequence have remainder of 0 (a_1, a_4, a_7, ...), 2 (a_2, a_5, a_8, ...) or 3 (a_3, a_6, a_9, ...) upon division by 8. Only 786 has appropriate remainder of 2 (105 and 1025 has a remainder of 1 upon division by 8 and 966 has a remainder of 6).

Hope it's clear.

Hi, Could you pls explain the underlined part i.e why do we need to find that out? Thanks.

Note that the terms in the sequence have remainder of 0 (a_1, a_4, a_7, ...), 2 (a_2, a_5, a_8, ...) or 3 (a_3, a_6, a_9, ...) upon division by 8. Only 786 has appropriate remainder of 2 (105 and 1025 has a remainder of 1 upon division by 8 and 966 has a remainder of 6).

Hope it's clear.

Hi, Could you pls explain the underlined part i.e why do we need to find that out? Thanks.

Because it helps to find the answer...

Numbers in the sequence can have only 3 remainders upon division by 8: 0, 2, or 3. Among the answer choices only 786 has appropriate remainder of 2 thus only 786 can be in the sequence. _________________

Note that the terms in the sequence have remainder of 0 (a_1, a_4, a_7, ...), 2 (a_2, a_5, a_8, ...) or 3 (a_3, a_6, a_9, ...) upon division by 8. Only 786 has appropriate remainder of 2 (105 and 1025 has a remainder of 1 upon division by 8 and 966 has a remainder of 6).

Hope it's clear.

Hi, Could you pls explain the underlined part i.e why do we need to find that out? Thanks.

The need to find this out comes from understanding the fact that from 4th term onwards, all the terms are of one of the three forms namely 8k+64 or 8k+66 or 8k+67, as a4 is a1+8 and so on. Therefore, we can deduce an important characteristic that any term of the sequence when divided by 8 should have remainder 0 or 2 or 3 and use this deduction to eliminate incorrect choices.

Note that the terms in the sequence have remainder of 0 (a_1, a_4, a_7, ...), 2 (a_2, a_5, a_8, ...) or 3 (a_3, a_6, a_9, ...) upon division by 8. Only 786 has appropriate remainder of 2 (105 and 1025 has a remainder of 1 upon division by 8 and 966 has a remainder of 6).

So any number that belongs to this sequence will be sum of one of 64/66/67 and some number of 8s.

105 - 64 = 41 which is not a multiple of 8. 41 is 1 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of 41 (in effect subtracting 66/67 out of 105), you will still not get a multiple of 8. Hence 105 is not in this sequence.

786 - 64 = 720 which is divisible by 8 hence it will be in the sequence. This is your answer and ideally you should stop here. But if you want to check the remaining two options:

966 - 64 = 902 which is not divisible by 8. Neither are 900 and 899. Or say that 902 is 6 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of it, you will still not get a multiple of 8.

1025 - 64 = 961 which is not divisible by 8 and is 1 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of it, it will still not give a multiple of 8.

Followed the same approach, the only problem is that 786 - 64 is NOT 720. Therefore, neither answer choice works

So any number that belongs to this sequence will be sum of one of 64/66/67 and some number of 8s.

105 - 64 = 41 which is not a multiple of 8. 41 is 1 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of 41 (in effect subtracting 66/67 out of 105), you will still not get a multiple of 8. Hence 105 is not in this sequence.

786 - 64 = 720 which is divisible by 8 hence it will be in the sequence. This is your answer and ideally you should stop here. But if you want to check the remaining two options:

966 - 64 = 902 which is not divisible by 8. Neither are 900 and 899. Or say that 902 is 6 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of it, you will still not get a multiple of 8.

1025 - 64 = 961 which is not divisible by 8 and is 1 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of it, it will still not give a multiple of 8.

Followed the same approach, the only problem is that 786 - 64 is NOT 720. Therefore, neither answer choice works

Please advice

Cheers! J

Yes, that's right. But when you check by subtracting another 2 (to account for 66), you get 720, a multiple of 8. _________________

So any number that belongs to this sequence will be sum of one of 64/66/67 and some number of 8s.

105 - 64 = 41 which is not a multiple of 8. 41 is 1 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of 41 (in effect subtracting 66/67 out of 105), you will still not get a multiple of 8. Hence 105 is not in this sequence.

786 - 64 = 720 which is divisible by 8 hence it will be in the sequence. This is your answer and ideally you should stop here. But if you want to check the remaining two options:

966 - 64 = 902 which is not divisible by 8. Neither are 900 and 899. Or say that 902 is 6 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of it, you will still not get a multiple of 8.

1025 - 64 = 961 which is not divisible by 8 and is 1 more than a multiple of 8 so when you subtract 2/3 out of it, it will still not give a multiple of 8.

Followed the same approach, the only problem is that 786 - 64 is NOT 720. Therefore, neither answer choice works

Please advice

Cheers! J

Yes, that's right. But when you check by subtracting another 2 (to account for 66), you get 720, a multiple of 8.

Yes actually what I did is notice that we had three cases right?

64 + 8k

66 + 8k

67 + 8k

Now, the first one is always a multiple of 8, the second one is a multiple of 8 plus 2, and the third one is a multiple of 8 plus 3

So we need to find the answer choice that fits the bill

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...