Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Jan 2015, 00:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 276 [1] , given: 1

A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2008, 01:02
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (01:12) correct 50% (02:58) wrong based on 32 sessions
A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is written on the blackboard. A student came along and erased one number. The average of the remaining numbers is 35 7/17. What was the number erased?

A. 7
B. 8
C. 9
D. 15
E. 17
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 160
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: PS: Average [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2008, 02:38
This one sure looks tricky. I am not able to reach the solution, but this is what i think. I am sure you must have done all this by now, but no harm in putting it down.
35 7/17 , means 602/17 , earlier i thought there must be 18 numbers, which is 17 + 1 that is taken out. But if there were, then their sum is 171 which is far too low. The average of 35 shows that the numbers were little higher, ( their sum should be 602 ) . The answer choices are very low numbers. I don't know how this is possible at all.

Sorry mate, i really doubt if the qs is correct ! Can you pls provide the source of this qs and check whether the numbers you mentioned are all correct ?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 112
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: PS: Average [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2008, 02:43
My method, I may not use this during the test, so i will still wait for another better solution.

set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1, if n is the last number => SUM(1) = n(n+1)/2

If 1 number was taken out, so the SUM(2) then will be (n - 1) * average = (n - 1) * (35 + 7/17)

As SUM(2) is an integer so (n-1) is divisible by 17, the original average is in this range (34+7/17, 36 + 7/17)
=> n is in (2*(34+7/17), 2*(36 + 7/17)) or n is in (68.8, 72.8)

(n-1) is divisible by 17 and n is in (68.8, 72.8) => n = 69

The number was erased = SUM(1) - SUM(2) = 69*70/2 - (69-1) * (35 + 7/17) = 7

Answer: A
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1573
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 0

Re: PS: Average [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2008, 03:03
lylya4 wrote:
My method, I may not use this during the test, so i will still wait for another better solution.

set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1, if n is the last number => SUM(1) = n(n+1)/2

If 1 number was taken out, so the SUM(2) then will be (n - 1) * average = (n - 1) * (35 + 7/17)

As SUM(2) is an integer so (n-1) is divisible by 17, the original average is in this range (34+7/17, 36 + 7/17)
=> n is in (2*(34+7/17), 2*(36 + 7/17)) or n is in (68.8, 72.8)

(n-1) is divisible by 17 and n is in (68.8, 72.8) => n = 69

The number was erased = SUM(1) - SUM(2) = 69*70/2 - (69-1) * (35 + 7/17) = 7

Answer: A



Could you elaborate the highlighted step further?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 112
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: PS: Average [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2008, 03:42
scthakur wrote:
lylya4 wrote:
My method, I may not use this during the test, so i will still wait for another better solution.

set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1, if n is the last number => SUM(1) = n(n+1)/2

If 1 number was taken out, so the SUM(2) then will be (n - 1) * average = (n - 1) * (35 + 7/17)

As SUM(2) is an integer so (n-1) is divisible by 17, the original average is in this range (34+7/17, 36 + 7/17)
=> n is in (2*(34+7/17), 2*(36 + 7/17)) or n is in (68.8, 72.8)

(n-1) is divisible by 17 and n is in (68.8, 72.8) => n = 69

The number was erased = SUM(1) - SUM(2) = 69*70/2 - (69-1) * (35 + 7/17) = 7

Answer: A



Could you elaborate the highlighted step further?



SUM (2) = (n - 1) * (35 + 7/17) = 35(n-1) + 7/17(n-1) as SUM(2) is an integer => 7/17(n-1) is integer or n-1 is divisible by 17

The range for the original average is just for to limit the result of n, if the largest number n was taken out, the average will be decreased at max n / (n-1) = 1 + 1/(n-1) ~ 1, so to be safe I place the range for this average +-1 to 35 7/17. This step can be ignored, instead we know that the average is ~35, so n should be around ~70 (average for consecutive integers = (n + 1)/2)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2014
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2014, 10:48
A better and easier method is as follows:
First of all, when ever a number is deleted from consecutive numbers, avg cant change more than 1/2.
So in this case new avg is 35 7/17, so old average was 35. Now, 35 is avg of first 69 numbers, so previously there were 69 num, and now there are 68(after deletion).
Now, 7/17 = 28/68 . So effectively, the number which was deleted gave 28/68 to each 68 num left, so the number should have been 28 less than 35(old avg)
Ans= 35-28=7.
Advantage with this method is that you can do it verbally.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 16

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2015, 10:24
Bunuel

Could you please help on this one ?

this part is little confusing to me. .

The range for the original average is just for to limit the result of n, if the largest number n was taken out, the average will be decreased at max n / (n-1) = 1 + 1/(n-1) ~ 1, so to be safe I place the range for this average +-1 to 35 7/17. This step can be ignored, instead we know that the average is ~35, so n should be around ~70 (average for consecutive integers = (n + 1)/2)
thanks
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 583
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 9

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2015, 12:31
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi All,

This question is layered with subtle "clues" as to how you can find the correct answer:

1) We're asked which number was removed from the list and the answers ARE numbers. We can use them against the prompt.
2) The average of the new group of numbers is 35 7/17. The denominator of THAT fraction tells us that the total number of terms in the new list MUST be a multiple of 17:

17, 34, 51, 68, 85, etc.

3) Since we're removing 1 number from a list of consecutive positive integers, we could quickly limit down the possible number of terms in the ORIGINAL list:

If new = 17, old = 18, but the numbers from 1 to 18 would NOT have an average in the mid-30s (it would be much smaller). ELIMINATE this option.
If new = 34, old = 35, but we run into the same problem. The average won't match here either. ELIMINATE this option.
If new = 51, old = 52, same problem here. ELIMINATE this option.

If new = 68, old = 69....HERE we have a group of numbers that might just be what we're looking for.

In the "old group", the average is the "middle term" = 35, which is REALLY close to the new average once we remove a number.

Now, we just have to figure out which of the 5 answers was removed (and that changed the new average to 35 7/17). There are a couple of ways to do this math, but I'm going to use the answers to save myself some steps:

Sum of 1 to 69, inclusive = 69(35) = 2415

Remove Answer B....2415 - 8 = 2407

New average = 2407/68 = 35 27/68

Now, we can compare 27/68 to 7/17

27/68 and 28/68

This is REALLY close, but is not the answer. Eliminate B. The answer is either A or C.

Since 28/68 is a BIGGER fraction than 27/68, we need the sum (of the 68 integers) to be BIGGER...which means we need to remove a SMALLER number.

Final Answer:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A


GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________

Rich Cohen
Rich.C@empowergmat.com
http://www.empowergmat.com

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is   [#permalink] 02 Jan 2015, 12:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 There are six consecutive positive integers in Set S. What corvinis 6 27 Aug 2012, 14:30
The average of a set of seven consecutive integers is (X+1) devilmirror 3 10 Feb 2007, 11:31
If the set S consists of consecutive integers, are there Himalayan 5 05 Jan 2007, 20:10
If z1,....,zn is a series of consecutive positive integers, netcaesar 7 13 Nov 2006, 13:54
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic If set N contains only consecutive positive integers, what christoph 10 06 Nov 2005, 09:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.