Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0, 2, 4 [#permalink]
27 Jun 2007, 02:59

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

26% (02:26) correct
74% (00:59) wrong based on 181 sessions

A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8. Which two numbers, if added to create a set of 7 numbers, will result in a new standard deviation that is close to the standard deviation for the original 5 numbers?

A. -1 and 9 B. 4 and 4 C. 3 and 5 D. 2 and 6 E. 0 and 8

From the given #s it is clear 4 is mean(average) of both sets.
If the variations of the sets are equal or close then their Stand Deviations are equal/close to each other too.

Variation of 1-set (5 #s) is 40/5=8
so Varition of set2 (7 #s) must be around 8 too, thus (40+ x)/7= around 8

x must be close to 16 so only D satisfies this value: (4-2)^2 +(4-6)^2=8
U can check others:
A) (4+1)^2+(4-9)^2=50
B) (4-4)^2+(4-4)^2=0
c) (4-3)^2+(4-5)^2=2
D) (4-2)^2 +(4-6)^2=8 E) (4-0)^2+(4-8)^2=32

From the given #s it is clear 4 is mean(average) of both sets. If the variations of the sets are equal or close then their Stand Deviations are equal/close to each other too.

Variation of 1-set (5 #s) is 40/5=8 so Varition of set2 (7 #s) must be around 8 too, thus (40+ x)/7= around 8

x must be close to 16 so only D satisfies this value: (4-2)^2 +(4-6)^2=8 U can check others: A) (4+1)^2+(4-9)^2=50 B) (4-4)^2+(4-4)^2=0 c) (4-3)^2+(4-5)^2=2 D) (4-2)^2 +(4-6)^2=8 E) (4-0)^2+(4-8)^2=32

This is a good explanation. You can also do it by looking at the numbers and using your common sense about standard deviation.

The average of the first list is 4 and the number deviate from 4 evenly. what i mean by that is, the next set of numbers (2,6) are both 2 away from 4, and the next set after that (0,8) are both 4 away from 4.

To have a similar deviation, we want the next set to look similar.

-1 and 9 will stretch the outter limits of the list, so that will increase the standard deviation significantly.
4 and 4 will add too much weight to the center of the list. It'll decrease the standard deviation.
3 and 5 may be right
2 and 6 may be right
0 and 8 will add weight to the outter limits again, and stretch the deviation.

So it's a toss up between (3 and 5) and (2 and 6). And my educated guess is on 2 and 6, since basically comes in right in the center of the previous standard deviation, it should change it the least.

For the record, I have never taught the standard deviation formula to any student of mine. I find it to be unnecessary for the GMAT when good, conceptual thinking can get you through.

From the given #s it is clear 4 is mean(average) of both sets. If the variations of the sets are equal or close then their Stand Deviations are equal/close to each other too.

Variation of 1-set (5 #s) is 40/5=8 so Varition of set2 (7 #s) must be around 8 too, thus (40+ x)/7= around 8

x must be close to 16 so only D satisfies this value: (4-2)^2 +(4-6)^2=8 U can check others: A) (4+1)^2+(4-9)^2=50 B) (4-4)^2+(4-4)^2=0 c) (4-3)^2+(4-5)^2=2 D) (4-2)^2 +(4-6)^2=8 E) (4-0)^2+(4-8)^2=32

This is a good explanation. You can also do it by looking at the numbers and using your common sense about standard deviation.

The average of the first list is 4 and the number deviate from 4 evenly. what i mean by that is, the next set of numbers (2,6) are both 2 away from 4, and the next set after that (0,8) are both 4 away from 4.

To have a similar deviation, we want the next set to look similar.

-1 and 9 will stretch the outter limits of the list, so that will increase the standard deviation significantly. 4 and 4 will add too much weight to the center of the list. It'll decrease the standard deviation. 3 and 5 may be right 2 and 6 may be right 0 and 8 will add weight to the outter limits again, and stretch the deviation.

So it's a toss up between (3 and 5) and (2 and 6). And my educated guess is on 2 and 6, since basically comes in right in the center of the previous standard deviation, it should change it the least.

For the record, I have never taught the standard deviation formula to any student of mine. I find it to be unnecessary for the GMAT when good, conceptual thinking can get you through.

Re: A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0,2,4,6, [#permalink]
30 Aug 2013, 08:12

The above method explains it well , and if you are short of time and need to make an educated guess , this works perfect.

If you are in for some calculations , this is how I got to it

mean = 4 sd = \sqrt{8} = 2.8

Expected values for the SD to not change are - One value below SD from mean is (4 - 2.8) = 1.2 , and one value above SD is (4 + 2.8) = 6.8 This would mean , adding 1.2 ans 6.8 would have no impact on the SD . SD remains the same when these two numbers are added. Now for SD to change the least , we need to add two values that are closest to these two values.

Hence any two values that are closest to 1.2 and 6.8 would change the SD , the least.

1. -1 , 9 distance between (1,9) and (1.2 and 6.8) is 2.2 and 2.2

2. 4 , 4 distance etween (4,4) and (1.2 , 6.8) is 2.8 and 2.8

3. 3 , 5 Distance is - 1.8 and 1.8

4. 2 , 6 Distance is - 0.8 and 0.8

5. 0 , 8 Distnace is - 1.2 and 1.2

Hence from above , we see that adding 2 and 6 , results in a value that would change the SD to the least. Hence D

Re: A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0, 2, 4 [#permalink]
31 Aug 2013, 04:33

Expert's post

GK_Gmat wrote:

A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8. Which two numbers, if added to create a set of 7 numbers, will result in a new standard deviation that is close to the standard deviation for the original 5 numbers?

A. -1 and 9 B. 4 and 4 C. 3 and 5 D. 2 and 6 E. 0 and 8

Re: A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0, 2, 4 [#permalink]
29 Oct 2014, 03:37

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Hey, Last week I started a few new things in my life. That includes shifting from daily targets to weekly targets, 45 minutes of exercise including 15 minutes of yoga, making...

This week went in reviewing all the topics that I have covered in my previous study session. I reviewed all the notes that I have made and started reviewing the Quant...

I started running as a cross country team member since highshcool and what’s really awesome about running is that...you never get bored of it! I participated in...