A Special Note on the New Verbal Portion : General GMAT Questions and Strategies
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 09 Dec 2016, 21:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A Special Note on the New Verbal Portion

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 188
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

A Special Note on the New Verbal Portion [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2006, 12:34
The verbal portion of the GMAT exam under the new administration, Pearson VUE, is tough and our task of conquering this new type of verbal portion has become tougher in view of the fact that there is no quality material available to prepare for it. I took my exam on April 28, 2006 and scored 35 in verbal. I have been getting a lot of questions about the new GMAT verbal portion and therefore, I decided to summarize my conclusions.

A lot of us who are in the middle of the preparation for this exam must have heard of GMAT SETS. If not, you can find these SETS at any other GMAT website. Kindly do not PM me to find these sets. Just do the search at testmagic.com or gmatclub.com and you will find several posts guiding you towards these SETS. With no disrespect to GMAT SETS, I believe that the verbal portion of GMAT SETS is little different from the real exam with RC being an exception.

In GMAT SETS and in majority of other material available in market, most of the SC errors are what I call STRUCTURED ERROS or SOLID GRAMMATICAL ERRORS. It is easy to pick such errors (modifier problem, subject verb agreement problems, pronoun problems, parallelism problems, run-on sentences, subordination & coordination problems etc). However, in the real exam, you will find that most of the concepts tested these days are not grammar-dependent but they are meaning-dependent. One may be able to narrow the available choices to final two choices but those two choices would be very close to each other with subtle differences. Those choices will be written slightly different from each other in such a way that the slight difference between them would change the original meaning of the sentence. In addition, you may find some sentences in which all 5 choices would be written poorly with couple of mistakes. New verbal portion is indeed a challenge!

I believe that the current verbal portion is designed by purpose to help native English speakers but that is OK. It is just matter of time and very soon non-native English Speakers will get a hang of current verbal pattern. Though, I really feel sorry for all those including myself who happened to get caught in this transitioning phase of GMAT.

Having said that, I have very solid reasons to claim that the type of SCs that you will find in GMATprep once you are scoring above 38 are very close to the type of SCs that you may face in the real exam. Therefore, donâ€™t be discouraged! In addition, I also believe that all those questions in OG11 and OG10 which fall under logical predication + diction + rhetorical construction categories in conjunction with three CCs (clear, concision and clarity) present the most heavily tested concepts in the real GMAT as far as SCs are concerned. I would like to reiterate myself that the some of the SCs that I found at GMATPREP were very close to the real exam. So donâ€™t worry.

CR questions in the new verbal exam are also tough. It is easy to comprehend the main stem but when you go and face the available answer choices, you do not have that â€œahaâ€

Last edited by haddy74 on 19 May 2006, 14:54, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 May 2006, 16:49
Anyone who has taken both the ETS and Pearson VUE version would like to comment on this?
From what i have read/heard seems like the Pearson VUE is harder
for both Quantitative and Verbal
Director
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 945
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 May 2006, 17:49
I haven't taken the new GMAT yet but took the GMATPrep exam last week and can relate to what you are saying about weight of SC.

In verbal, out of the last 14 questions, I got 12 wrong. Total I got 15 wrong.
1 was RC
3 was CR
11 was SC.
However, I ended up with a 40.

Also, out of the 11 SCs that I got wrong, 9 SCs had A as the answer. This is after I had picked at 4 SC answers correctly as A. This was out of a total 16 SCs.
Intern
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 May 2006, 11:33
I sincerely think that you are overreacting to a bad grade. I took the Pearson's GMAT two weeks ago and scored 99 percentile in verbal. I found verbal extremely easy. I ended up with thirty minutes to spare. I am not a native speaker and all the preparation I did was to go over the OG verbal questions once.

Now Quant... yes I found quant harder than I had expected,

If you want my sincere opinion the Pearson's test is about equal to ETS in verbal but harder in quant.
GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5926
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
Followers: 311

Kudos [?]: 2012 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

30 May 2006, 15:05
I'll jump in on this...

I worked on my SC and took my verbal scores from 34-36 to 42-46. I took the real exam today and got a 45 verbal (99%). I'm convinced sentence correction was the key. If you are looking for 'bang for the buck' on verbal, focus on SC.
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2006, 08:58
I am a non-native speaker, although I have lived here for the last 14 years. I took the GMAT less than a week ago and I got 39. While this is not a stellar score, I am happy with it.

First off, I think GMATPrep is exactly like Pearson's GMAT. I was always averaging 39 - 41 on the GMATPrep and 39 is exactly the score I got.

The questions didn't seem any more difficult than the ones I found in the Official Guide. My friend teaches the GMAT for the Princeton Review and he gave me just two tips to use on the SC:

1) Look for grammatical errors (idioms, modifiers, etc)
2) pick the most concise one that does not change the meaning

I do agree that CR questions are pretty difficult, but they are also difficult in the GMATPrep and the Official Guide... Sometimes the "assumption" questions lift things straight from the reading portion (which, in my opinion, is no longer an "assumption" and a "reasoning" or a "fact")... basically CR has it's own language... but MGMAT is very helpful with this.

For me, I found the RC portion to be the section to really boost my Verbal score, then the SC portion, then CR.

Overall, I found the Official Guide and the GMATPrep to accurately reflect the types of questions you will get on the GMAT.
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2006, 10:47
My June 29th 2006 experience: verbal WAY tougher than expected (I had never been challenged in this section before, even during my so-called Â«Kaplan Premium PrepÂ»), and the quantitative WAY easier than anticipated (with obvious upper sets of question), maybe because that's where I had mainly put all my focus & energy.

It seems that the difficulty level in Pearson View testing varies a lot from one person to another, whereas in previous exams (ETS) the average results were flatter maybe!?

Second take formula for success:

[(RC + CR + SC) x 1000 + KAPLAN + LSAT + EXPERIENCE]^10 / (-STRESS FACTOR)
Intern
Joined: 25 Oct 2005
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2006, 12:31
i ve seen a couple of posters here mention that sc and cr are weighted more than sc. Is this just a hunch or someone has access to gmat weightage in verbal... like to know...
Director
Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 624
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 18:32
Pearson verbal is exactly the same as GMATPrep. Nothing to get worked up about. It is true that new SC may test some more subtle errors occasionally but this is also true of GMATPrep. By the way I took ETS and Pearson tests
SVP
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2304
Schools: Darden
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 475 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2006, 16:36
That's interesting. Does that mean that now SC includes some critical reasoning components because of the subtle differences in meaning, rather than just straight grammar correction?

Several people have commented that it is exactly like the GMATprep software, so if that is the case, then I guess that should be fine. I think most people are afraid that they will be hit with something completely new on test day.
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 496
Schools: Darden '15
GMAT Date: 12-07-2011
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2007, 11:54
Hi,

Can I find the GMATPrep somewhere on the web for free? I don't want to pay 75\$ for it

Thansk
GMATPrep   [#permalink] 05 Apr 2007, 11:54
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 SOME VERBAL NOTES OR QUESTIONS NEEDED PLEASE!!!! 0 05 Apr 2013, 01:43
Question on AWA writing portion 1 31 Jul 2012, 14:39
AWA portion: Length and # of arguments? Thanks! 2 20 Apr 2012, 18:32
Note-taking during Verbal? 1 19 Jul 2011, 17:47
1 Strategy on when to Guess on Quantitative Portion? 2 07 Mar 2010, 18:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A Special Note on the New Verbal Portion

Moderators: HiLine, WaterFlowsUp

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.