Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 May 2013, 21:35
Customize  |  Hide

A study of children of divorced parents found that ten years

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 16
Location: NEW JERSEY
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

A study of children of divorced parents found that ten years [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 17:21
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
A study of children of divorced parents found that ten years after the parents' divorce, children who had been under six years of age at the time of the settlement were not preoccupied, nor very curious, about the reasons that led to their parents' divorce.

A) not preoccupied, nor even very curious, about the reasons that led to their parents' divorce
B) not preoccupied, with, or even very curious about, the reasons for their parents' divorce
C) neither preoccupied, nor even very curious, with the reasons that led to their parents divorce
D) neither preoccupied with the reasons that led to their parents' divorces or even very curious about them
E) neither preoccupied with the reasons that their parents divorced not even very curious about it

Source: GMAT 800 Cracked
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 331
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC: Parents' Divorce [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 17:33
IMO C.

Neither can be used only with nor, however nor can be used by itself.

Thus, we have A and C left.

However, "occupied with" is the correct idiom rather than "occupied about". Hence IMO C.
SVP
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1946
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC: Parents' Divorce [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 19:01
1. not...nor
2. neither...nor

both of 1 and 2 are ok

A for me!
_________________

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: SC: Parents' Divorce [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2008, 19:25
hams7uc wrote:
A study of children of divorced parents found that ten years after the parents' divorce, children who had been under six years of age at the time of the settlement were not preoccupied, nor very curious, about the reasons that led to their parents' divorce.

A) not preoccupied, nor even very curious, about the reasons that led to their parents' divorce
B) not preoccupied, with, or even very curious about, the reasons for their parents' divorce
C) neither preoccupied, nor even very curious, with the reasons that led to their parents divorce
D) neither preoccupied with the reasons that led to their parents' divorces or even very curious about them
E) neither preoccupied with the reasons that their parents divorced not even very curious about it

Source: GMAT 800 Cracked


I think the SC is testing prepositions + Neither/nor concepts
I got B by POE

A. "with" missing after "preoccupied"
Also "Not X ,Nor Y " is incorrect Usage

No X , nor Y
No X or Y
No X and no Y
are the correct idioms


c. neither preoccupied, nor even very curious, with , is incorrect
neither preoccupied with , nor even very curious about , the reasons

D. What is "them" referring to? Divorces, reasons?
Logically it must refer to "reasons"

E. Neither X nor Y is the correct usage
Also "it" - incorrect pronoun for reasons.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 16
Location: NEW JERSEY
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Parents' Divorce [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2008, 03:35
OA is B

B uses the right prepositions at the right place with more clarity and the correct idiom is "curious about" and not "curious with"
SVP
SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1612
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC: Parents' Divorce [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2008, 04:36
i would have picked B ... are you sure there are no typos in it though ? The commas around 'with' seem unecessary.
Director
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 635
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC: Parents' Divorce [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2008, 09:17
pmenon wrote:
i would have picked B ... are you sure there are no typos in it though ? The commas around 'with' seem unecessary.


exacty, i kicked out B because of the comma.
Re: SC: Parents' Divorce   [#permalink] 02 Jul 2008, 09:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Houses built during the last ten years have been found to batliwala 5 19 Apr 2004, 01:19
New posts A study of children of divorced parents found that ten years Dharmin 5 14 May 2004, 03:43
Popular new posts Houses built during the last ten years have been found to aurobindo 10 06 Dec 2006, 08:14
New posts Parent 1: Ten years ago, children in communities like ours mymba99 8 16 Apr 2008, 11:51
New posts 1 During a divorce, children are often viewed like bargaining MontrealLady 9 21 Aug 2009, 20:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A study of children of divorced parents found that ten years

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.