Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 16:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A study showed that only ten percent of American dog owners

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 167
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

A study showed that only ten percent of American dog owners [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2005, 05:00
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
A study showed that only ten percent of American dog owners enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes. More than twenty percent of these dog owners, the study also showed, participate in dog show. Thus it is obvious that people who train ther dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.

The conclusion above is correct provided that which of the following statements is also true?

(A) It is impossible for a dog to complete in a dog show if the dog has not completed at least one formal obedience training class.
(B) The proportion of dog owners who enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes is representative of the proportion who train their dogs outside such classes.
(C) Dog owners who participate in dog shows only train ther dogs by enrolling them in formal obedience training lessons.
(D) Participation in dog shows is a reliable indicator of how much attention a dog owner pays to his dog.
(E) Only purebred dogs can participate in dog shows, so many owners who enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes are excluded from ths activity.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 136
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Dog Owners [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2005, 05:37
Hmm, I think I'll pick A.

(B) The proportion of dog owners who enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes is representative of the proportion who train their dogs outside such classes.
- There is no mention about training dogs outside of classes.

(C) Dog owners who participate in dog shows only train ther dogs by enrolling them in formal obedience training lessons.
- If owners enroll their dogs in obediance schools, then they may also enroll them in dog shows. Not the other way around.

(D) Participation in dog shows is a reliable indicator of how much attention a dog owner pays to his dog.
- How much attention the owner pays to his dog is irrelevant to the conclusion.

(E) Only purebred dogs can participate in dog shows, so many owners who enroll their dogs in formal obedience training classes are excluded from ths activity.
- This is irrelevant to the argument because there is no mentioning of purebred dogs.
_________________

Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the number of moments that take your breath away.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 219
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2005, 06:04
looks like A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 364
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2005, 06:59
I would pick B

The conclusion is:
people who train their dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.

A looks good but seem little too extreme for me.
This means that's it's only the 20 percent of the 10 percent of the dog
owners dogs who can participate in dog show.

B looks better to me.
If we know that dogs get trained not only in the formal training session but also get trained somehwere place else, that implies that there're in fact more dogs who are trained than only the 10 percent of dogs who goes in those formal training classes. I guess this strengthen the conclusion.

C. this would weaken the conclusion

D not relevant

E not relevant
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 847
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2005, 09:04
macca wrote:
I would pick B

The conclusion is:
people who train their dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.
B looks better to me.
If we know that dogs get trained not only in the formal training session but also get trained somehwere place else, that implies that there're in fact more dogs who are trained than only the 10 percent of dogs who goes in those formal training classes. I guess this strengthen the conclusion.

Macca, option B talks only about people who train their dogs outside the class , but nothing is said about their participating in dog shows. If anything, it'll serve to detract from the conclusion.
I know my explanation is not very clear. If somebody can do the job better, do step up!
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2005, 19:41
This is a tricky one. Between A and B - My vote for B!

Why not A?
The conclusion says .....more likely than.....

A says that a dog has to have atleast one training class..else it is impossible to attend a show. This contradicts the conclusion. If this is true than, the .... more likely than.......wont be possible.
If A were to be true, then the conclusion should not have said..more likely than...
Your logic guys!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 180
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2005, 04:19
hmm....truly a tough one..,.
I see C also as a possible contender.
Can some one prove why C shud not be an answer???



Thanks,
Krishna
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2005, 14:41
I am stuck between A and C... but finally I will choose A
_________________

hey ya......

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2005
Posts: 408
Location: Las Vegas
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2005, 19:53
C for me
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2005, 20:00
OA please!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 406
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2005, 21:27
Please give us OA...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 180
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2005, 21:57
Hi,

can you plz give the OA..


Krishna
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2005, 10:24
A for me.

we need to prove the percentage of dog show participants from the group of trained dogs is more than the percentage of dog show participants from the group of untrained dogs. How do I show 20% of the trained dogs is a relatively higher percentage?

Thru A. If it is impossible to particpate in the dog show without the formal training program then there are no dogs outside of the formally trained group that participate in the dog show. That makes the 20% a max.

GA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 167
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2005, 12:24
The OA is B

macca's reasoning is correct

A is too extreme and B accounts for the other people who train their dogs outside of formal class
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 406
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2005, 00:40
kimmyg wrote:
The OA is B

macca's reasoning is correct

A is too extreme and B accounts for the other people who train their dogs outside of formal class


I have not been to understand OA.

Conclusion : people who train ther dogs are more likely to participate in dog shows than are people who do not train their dogs.

B doesn't talk about participation in dog shows...Can someone please explain
  [#permalink] 20 Sep 2005, 00:40
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A study showed taht only ten percent of americans dog owners handikap 14 13 Oct 2008, 12:11
Dog owners in B-school? Ntang 6 16 Sep 2008, 07:01
A study showed that only ten percent of American dog owners andrewnorway 3 15 Nov 2006, 13:15
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette mailtheguru 13 23 Jul 2006, 11:01
Surveys show that every year only 10 percent of cigarette remgeo 8 05 Apr 2006, 04:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A study showed that only ten percent of American dog owners

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.