Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jul 2014, 21:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A study was designed to establish what effect, if any, the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 318
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 1

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
A study was designed to establish what effect, if any, the [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2009, 00:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
5. A study was designed to establish what effect, if any, the long-term operation of offshore oil rigs had on animal life on the bottom of the sea. The study compared the sea-bottom communities near rigs with those located in control sites several miles from any rig and found no significant differences. The researchers concluded that oil rigs had no adverse effect on sea-bottom animals.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher’ conclusion?
(A) Commercially important fish depend on sea-bottom animals for much of their food, so a drop in catches of these fish would be evidence of damage to sea-bottom communities.
(B) The discharge of oil from offshore oil rigs typically occurs at the surface of the water, and currents often carry the oil considerable distances before it settles on the ocean floor.
(C) Contamination of the ocean floor from sewage and industrial effluent does not result in the destruction of all sea-bottom animals but instead reduces species diversity as well as density of animal life.
(D) Only part of any oil discharged into the ocean reaches the ocean floor: some oil evaporates, and some remains in the water as suspended drops
(E) Where the ocean floor consists of soft sediment, contaminating oil persists much longer than where the ocean floor is rocky.


The OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
b


Please Explain
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 172
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Re: A study was designed [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2009, 11:05
vaivish1723 wrote:
5. A study was designed to establish what effect, if any, the long-term operation of offshore oil rigs had on animal life on the bottom of the sea. The study compared the sea-bottom communities near rigs with those located in control sites several miles from any rig and found no significant differences. The researchers concluded that oil rigs had no adverse effect on sea-bottom animals.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher’ conclusion?
(A) Commercially important fish depend on sea-bottom animals for much of their food, so a drop in catches of these fish would be evidence of damage to sea-bottom communities.
(B) The discharge of oil from offshore oil rigs typically occurs at the surface of the water, and currents often carry the oil considerable distances before it settles on the ocean floor.
(C) Contamination of the ocean floor from sewage and industrial effluent does not result in the destruction of all sea-bottom animals but instead reduces species diversity as well as density of animal life.
(D) Only part of any oil discharged into the ocean reaches the ocean floor: some oil evaporates, and some remains in the water as suspended drops
(E) Where the ocean floor consists of soft sediment, contaminating oil persists much longer than where the ocean floor is rocky.


(A) Out of scope, there is nothing here to suggest that the damage mentioned was a result of oil rigs.
(C) Out of scope, this does not discuss oil rigs, but other source of pollution.
(D) Irrelevant, does not discuss damage to the sea bottom organisms FROM OIL RIGS.
(E) Irrelevant for the same reason as above.

(B) The only reasonable choice. The original info suggests that even though the waters near oil rigs may not be polluted, other sea bottom areas are damaged. This directly undermines the conclusion that oil rigs have "NO" adverse effects on sea-bottom animals.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 160
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 11

GMAT Tests User
Re: A study was designed [#permalink] New post 21 Jul 2009, 01:52
(A) Commercially important fish depend on sea-bottom animals for much of their food, so a drop in catches of these fish would be evidence of damage to sea-bottom communities.
- Irrelevant, refuted in the passage
(B) The discharge of oil from offshore oil rigs typically occurs at the surface of the water, and currents often carry the oil considerable distances before it settles on the ocean floor.
- Weaken
(C) Contamination of the ocean floor from sewage and industrial effluent does not result in the destruction of all sea-bottom animals but instead reduces species diversity as well as density of animal life.
- Strengthen
(D) Only part of any oil discharged into the ocean reaches the ocean floor: some oil evaporates, and some remains in the water as suspended drops
- Neither
(E) Where the ocean floor consists of soft sediment, contaminating oil persists much longer than where the ocean floor is rocky.
- Irrelevant
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 852
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 106

GMAT Tests User
Re: A study was designed [#permalink] New post 21 Jul 2009, 01:57
Agree with b. Only choice makes sense.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Re: A study was designed   [#permalink] 21 Jul 2009, 01:57
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Establishing a most effective study plan. vards 0 02 Jun 2014, 11:26
Studying Quant Effectively n2739178 5 02 Oct 2010, 10:19
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of marcodonzelli 12 30 Jan 2008, 05:38
A study was designed to establish what effect, if any, the vineetgupta 4 11 Mar 2007, 03:51
Any advice on what kind of study material will be useful 710GMAT 2 06 Oct 2004, 17:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A study was designed to establish what effect, if any, the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.