Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 15 Apr 2014, 20:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2005, 04:04
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts to be the best source for historical understanding. None of the historians regarded painting, architecture, music, dance, or culinary arts as the best source for historical understanding. So these historians neglect many important repositories of historical knowledge.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument takes for granted that

A) there are no potential sources for historical understanding other than written texts and the arts
B) painting, architecture, music, dance and culinary arts are important only as sources for historical understanding
C) there are no sources for historical understanding that are neither considered best by historians nor neglected by them
D) something other than written texts is the best sources for historical understanding.
E) the other sources for historical understanding mentioned by the historians surveyed are not important repositories of historical knowledge.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 870
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2005, 04:11
I will go with E
Just beacuse the historians said that the best source for historical understanding is written texts, doesn't mean that the others are not important.
Director
Director
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 910
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2005, 04:28
rthothad wrote:
I will go with E
Just beacuse the historians said that the best source for historical understanding is written texts, doesn't mean that the others are not important.


Rthothad, is that what E is really saying? I read it to mean the historians mentioned only texts as important repositories of historical knowledge (based on the stem). so if we infer that the historians mentioned more important repositories of historical knowledge, then E is telling us that those are important as well.

I think it's A in that addresses the fact the argument assumes text and the arts(painting, architecture, music, dance and culinary arts ) are the only source of historical understanding.

i think A and E kind of overlap. I pick A though
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 870
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2005, 04:40
Foola, The historians said that the best source for historical understanding is the written texts but the author used this to conclude that the historians neglect other sources, so I was looking for something that will bring out this discrepancy and felt that E was close.
Director
Director
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 910
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2005, 04:55
rthothad wrote:
Foola, The historians said that the best source for historical understanding is the written texts but the author used this to conclude that the historians neglect other sources, so I was looking for something that will bring out this discrepancy and felt that E was close.


Okay. i see what you are saying.
VP
VP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1448
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2005, 07:02
I think "C" is best.

In sum argument says that as the historians consider texts as the best means they neglect other repositories. "C" points out that assumption. If u negate "C" i.e. there ARE sources available that are neither considered best nor neglected by the historians, then the argument falls apart because then we can categorize these other repositories as these particular sources.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 377
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2005, 07:52
I picked C too.

Just because the scientists don't consider them as best, it doesn't mean that they ignore them.They might consider them as just plain good and hence definitely not neglected.

HMTG.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Posts: 21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2005, 10:25
C is it
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2005, 01:10
HowManyToGo wrote:
I picked C too.

Just because the scientists don't consider them as best, it doesn't mean that they ignore them.They might consider them as just plain good and hence definitely not neglected.

HMTG.


I will go with E.
Question is asking for what is taken for granted in the passage. 'Considering written texts as best source' is what is taken as granted. Choice C is negation of this - and is NOT what is taken for granted.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2005, 01:20
Whats wrong with D.???
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 562
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: A Historian's Survey [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2005, 17:12
Although this question is not an assumption question, i tackled it by trying to weaken the assumption. The assumption is that painting, arch., music, dance or culinary arts are best sources for historical understanding. So, if we have an option that says that they are not (weakens the assumption), then it should be the answer. I actually figured out my ans. before looking at the options and viola, it was stated in (E).
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2005, 07:11
The OA is C.

I think Ban does a fabulous job of explaining why AC C is the flaw in the argument. I narrowed down my AC to C and E. Notice when you negate AC E is makes the "conclusion" stronger. Well if it does then its not a flaw in the argument. Same analogy can be applied to assumption questions too.
Director
Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 674
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2005, 08:54
In what conditions do we need to negate the choices in the CR questions generally?
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 562
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Jul 2005, 04:31
gmat2me2 wrote:
In what conditions do we need to negate the choices in the CR questions generally?


I do not think there is a specific rule for this. It rather depends on individual approach. For tough assumption questions (e.g. when we have LEAST, EXCEPT, etc, in assumption questions), i tend to negate. Sometimes, when the options are close enough for comfort, i also negate. Some books (can't remember which now) will tell you that for weaken and strenghten questions, one should attempt to either weaken or strenghten the assumption, and in doing so, you may have to negate to find a valid assumption first (though this process may waste your time). So, IMO, it all depends on what works best for you.

Yes, the answer is (C). (E) actually tends to strenghten the position. Had the word 'NOT' been absent in (E), then (E) may have been a serious contender.
  [#permalink] 11 Jul 2005, 04:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts A survey by the national council of Churches showed that in sandalphon 6 08 Nov 2005, 05:07
New posts A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in aikido_fudoshin 1 11 Nov 2005, 21:05
Popular new posts Historians believe that the tombs of Egyptian pharaohs, GMATT73 10 08 Dec 2005, 23:15
New posts 2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Most bio-historians believe that a particular disease pikachu 5 20 May 2013, 16:26
New posts 1 Some historians believe that during no other deployment mayur666 2 30 Sep 2013, 07:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A survey of historians shows that most believe written texts

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.