Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 05 May 2016, 02:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 15 Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2013, 23:46
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

80% (02:36) correct 20% (01:29) wrong based on 79 sessions

### HideShow timer Statictics

A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going children. the telefilm contained characters who harmed others either deliberately or accidentally.
when the children questioned on the appropriate punishment for these different characters, they suggested same punishments, equally, for all those who caused
harm whether intentionally or otherwise. so, it is clear that children children do not go into intentions of a criminal to determine the degree of punishment to be awarded.

which of the following, if true, would most seriously weakens above conclusion.

a) The children suggested punishments according to the severity of the harm done by characters.
b) The older among the children suggested punishments that were similar to the ones suggested by adults in similar cases.
c) Younger children are as likely to cause harm to others as older children.
d) Interpretation of the film requires maturity, to be able to distinguish between committed intentionally or otherwise.
e) The film depicted the severity of the crime clearly.

The answer given in book is "D".

But as per my knowledge, the CONCLUSION is "it is clear that children children do not go into intentions of a criminal to determine the degree of punishment to be awarded." so answers "D" is strengthening the conclusion. is my understanding right?. Please explain how answer "D" weakens the conclusion.

Edit: by carcass
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Intern
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 14
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
Schools: Yale '16, YLP '16 (M)
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [1] , given: 23

Re: I found this tricky..Please explain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2013, 02:47
1
KUDOS
I think so too! According to me D strengthens the conclusion.
Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 490
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 324

Kudos [?]: 1644 [0], given: 82

Re: I found this tricky..Please explain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2013, 03:12
Expert's post
From which source you got this question??
_________________

Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2871
Followers: 639

Kudos [?]: 5063 [0], given: 871

Re: A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going children [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2013, 11:07
Expert's post
Please before posting a question in verbal Section of the forum, if you are not sure on HOW to post, read the rules for posting.

rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html

Thanks
_________________
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2871
Followers: 639

Kudos [?]: 5063 [0], given: 871

Re: A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going children [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2013, 11:17
Expert's post
A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going children.

A film is exhibited to a group. Ok

the telefilm contained characters who harmed others either deliberately or accidentally.

The actors (interpreting their role) do something deliberately or accidentally.

when the children questioned on the appropriate punishment for these different characters, they suggested same punishments, equally, for all those who caused
harm whether intentionally or otherwise.

The children do not care about too much of the punishements. they give them indipendently. in other words: no matter what. from this we can argue that the same children do not distinguish bettwee something that is good from what is NOt good. the reasons maybe go beyond our scope to understand this

so, it is clear that children children do not go into intentions of a criminal to determine the degree of punishment to be awarded.

The conclusion confirm the previous statement

which of the following, if true, would most seriously weakens above conclusion.

a) The children suggested punishments according to the severity of the harm done by characters.

here the childre act based on the severety of the harm inflicted but NOT if these are given intentionally or not

b) The older among the children suggested punishments that were similar to the ones suggested by adults in similar cases.

Irrelevant this comparison

c) Younger children are as likely to cause harm to others as older children.

Irrelevant this comparison

d) Interpretation of the film requires maturity, to be able to distinguish between committed intentionally or otherwise.

if we find something that explain that the children are conscious about the intention of a criminal to do so the argument is weaken. D say this: the children are able to distinguish clearly

e) The film depicted the severity of the crime clearly.

What the movie depicts is irrelevant

D is correct
_________________
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2963
Followers: 1006

Kudos [?]: 4318 [0], given: 48

Re: A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2013, 11:54
Expert's post
vasant111 wrote:
A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going children. The telefilm contained characters who harmed others either deliberately or accidentally. When the children were questioned on the appropriate punishment for these different characters, they suggested same punishments, equally, for all those who caused harm whether intentionally or otherwise. So, it is clear that children children do not go into intentions of a criminal to determine the degree of punishment to be awarded.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weakens above conclusion.
(A) The children suggested punishments according to the severity of the harm done by characters.
(B) The older among the children suggested punishments that were similar to the ones suggested by adults in similar cases.
(C) Younger children are as likely to cause harm to others as older children.
(D) Interpretation of the film requires maturity, to be able to distinguish between committed intentionally or otherwise.
(E) The film depicted the severity of the crime clearly.

Quote:
Hi Mike, I am not able to understand how option A is incorrect & option D is correct. Can you kindly clarify my doubts. I will be highly thankful to u .Regards, Fame

First of all, I don't know whether you read carcass' thorough explanation here. I thought carcass did a good job analyzing this question.

(A) is a peculiar answer, because it directly contradicts the evidence in the argument. The argument says, "[the children] suggested same punishments, equally, for all those who caused harm." (A) implies the children suggested different punishments, not the same. Right there, this is the mark of a poorly written question. On the GMAT, the CR answer choices will add new information or clarify, but will never directly contradict the evidence.
Having said that, I agree with what carcass said. Suppose;
Character A causes a mild bruise by accident
Character B causes a mild bruise on purpose
Character C causes someone to lose a limb by accident.
(Oops!)
Character D causes someone to lose a limb on purpose.
If we were judging by intention, we would give the severest punishment to D, and relatively severe to B, whereas we would consider the non-intentionality a strongly mitigating factor for C, and probably we would let A pass without comment. In the real worlds, D would clearly be a felony, and depending on circumstances, B might be considered the felony of assault. C might be tried under something like "recklessness", or it were purely accidental, not the result of reckless behavior, it would be handled only in the civil courts. A has no place at all in the court system.
By contrast, (A) suggest the kids would punish C & D the same, and would punish A & B the same. In other words, they are totally ignoring the issue of intentionality, which is precisely what the argument says.

The conclusion of the argument is: "It is clear that children children do not go into intentions of a criminal to determine the degree of punishment to be awarded." The phrasing "go into" is regrettably informal and imprecise. Also, is punishment really "awarded"? Congratulations, you win this punishment? This question is nowhere near GMAT-level material. Presumably, what this conclusion means is: "Children choose not to give any consideration to a criminal's intention when they determine the appropriate degree of punishment." What weakens this conclusion?

(D) says, essentially, because the telefilm was sophisticated, children simply didn't understand the intentions of the characters. It's not that they could recognize the intentions and chose not to take them into consideration, as the (clarified) conclusion suggests. Rather, they just didn't understand intentions at all. All they could see were the instances of harm, so they treated accidental harm and intentional harm the same.

Part of what made this a challenging question is that it was of such poor quality.

Let me know if anyone reading this has any questions.
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Current Student
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1095
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 70

Re: A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2013, 21:12
D can be the correct answer, only if we assume that children do not have maturity. This is a truth. But I m not sure that it can be carried in this question. There are 100's of child prodigy......
So i think D may or may not be the correct answer........

Archit
Re: A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going   [#permalink] 25 Mar 2013, 21:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Jan: People should not go to the new exhibition of Thornton 4 09 Jul 2011, 02:49
G: The group of works exhibited in this year s Metropolitan 5 31 Jul 2010, 01:56
G: The group of works exhibited in this year s Metropolitan 13 07 May 2009, 02:12
G: The group of works exhibited in this year s Metropolitan 14 07 May 2009, 02:05
1 G: The group of works exhibited in this year's Metropolitan 25 02 May 2007, 20:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A telefilm was exhibited to a group of school going

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.