Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Apr 2014, 23:20

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 242
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 8

A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2011, 12:17
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

52% (02:26) correct 47% (01:33) wrong based on 57 sessions
A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops showed that Brazilian yields are 68% of Canadian yields when compared on the basis of per planted acre. However, Brazilian yields are 115% of Canadian yields when measured per agricultural acre.

Based on this information, which of the following can most reliably be inferred about Brazilian and Canadian agriculture over this time period?

A greater percentage of Canadian agricultural acreage was unplanted than of Brazilian agricultural acreage.
A majority of Canadian acreage is unplanted.
More total acres were unplanted in Canada than in Brazil.
Brazil had more acres planted than unplanted while Canada has more acres unplanted than planted.
Brazil produced more total crops than Canada.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2011, 12:26
is it A?
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
Status:
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 525
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Followers: 54

Kudos [?]: 232 [1] , given: 9

Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2011, 20:59
1
This post received
KUDOS
The answer is (A).

Lets set up the answer first, before we evaluate the possible answer choices. Yield is the amount of crop grown on a piece of land. When compared on a per planted acre basis, crops in Brazil have much lower yield (68%) when compared by crops in Canada. However, when compared on a per agricultural acre basis, Brazilian crops have a higher (115%) yield than Canadian crops.

Now lets evaluate the answer choices.

(A): CORRECT. If Brazilian crops have a lower planted yield than Canadian crops, then the only way for Brazilian crops to have a greater agricultural yield is if a greater portion of every agricultural acre is planted in Brazil than it is in Canada. Imagine this: if both Brazilian crops and Canadian crops had the same planted yield, and Brazil had a greater agricultural yield, we would conclude that this must be because a greater proportion of every acre is planted in Brazil than in Canada. Since the Brazilian planted yield is less than the Canadian yield, this must certainly be true.
(B): This is the wrong inference. It is possible that a majority of acreage in Canada is planted - the only truth, as we saw, is that on a per agricultural acre basis, Canada has a lesser percentage of its acreage planted than Brazil does. It is possible that Canada has 80% of its acreage planted while Brazil has 95% of its acreage planted. Would you call 80% less than a majority? No.
(C): This cannot be inferred. The question discusses yields on a per agricultural acre basis. There is no mention of the total acres of unplanted acreage in Canada or Brazil. It is possible that Canada has a greater number of total planted acres than Brazil does - only they are more sparsely planted than the Brazilian ones. Incorrect.
(D): This is the wrong inference following the logic in option (C) above. Incorrect.
(E): This cannot be inferred - it is possible that Canada produced more crops, even if by using its land less efficiently. Incorrect.
_________________

Free profile evaluation by top b-school alumni: email us at info@gyanone.com
Personalized 1-on-1 GMAT coaching: www.gyanone.com/1-on-1-gmat/

Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 75
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2011, 05:45
got t be A
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Applying for 2012 B school admissions
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 131
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V35
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.6
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 32

Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink] New post 02 Aug 2011, 22:36
+1 A, on the lines of explanation given by GyanOne.
_________________

cheers
Mayank
My GMAT Journey: 720 + dare = 760

Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 114
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2011, 02:29
+1 for A
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 245
Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 25

Reviews Badge
Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2011, 09:08
IMO A what is OA
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2011
Posts: 154
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 42

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2011, 22:23
1+ A
took me 5 secs :D
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 151
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2011, 00:13
agree with A
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 203
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops [#permalink] New post 14 Jan 2012, 22:04
+ 1 for A.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2011
Posts: 42
GMAT 1: Q V
GMAT 2: Q V
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [1] , given: 11

Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink] New post 16 Dec 2012, 17:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
If you draw a diagram for this as you are reading the stimulus, it's a lot easier to see what's going on without getting entangled in the per planted, per agricultural acreage mumbo jumbo.

Draw two big boxes representing Brazil and Canada's agricultural acreage (agricultural acreage is bound to be bigger than planted acreage). Inside the Brazil box, draw five smaller boxes representing planted acres and write 68 (representing crops yielded) on each of them. Similarly, draw three smaller boxes inside Canada's big box and write 100 (crops yielded) on each. this is what the stimulus is saying. that per planted acre, brazil yields only 68% of canada's per planted yield. but in terms of the bigger box or agricultural acreage, brazil yields more than canada. so what is the question saying? there is just more planted acres in brazil than in canada. if u look at per planted acre, u see that canada yields more, but if u look at the total crops produced, brazil wins by virtue of it having more planted acres.

Armed with this understanding, you can attack the choices.

A. this is in line with our understanding. definitely a contender if not THE answer.
B. a majority of canadian.... majority? this is not descriptive enough. FAIL.
C. more total acres were unplanted in Can than Bra. close but total acres? it's trying to be tricky. we are talking about planted and agricultural acres and now total acres just brings the whole of the land mass into picture. Vague, beyond, irrelevant, whatever. FAIL.
D. Sounds reasonable but the second part of this choice- canada has more unplanted than planted- is saying too much and also it says "acres" doesn't specify agricultural or planted. FAIL.
E. This sounds reasonable but the stimulus talks in terms of percentage- that brazil yields 68% less per PA but 115% more per AA. but the numbers that form the base for those percentages are unclear. this becomes that data sufficiency question where both statement 1 and 2 are together insufficient.
Hence A.
Hope this helps.



GyanOne wrote:
The answer is (A).

Lets set up the answer first, before we evaluate the possible answer choices. Yield is the amount of crop grown on a piece of land. When compared on a per planted acre basis, crops in Brazil have much lower yield (68%) when compared by crops in Canada. However, when compared on a per agricultural acre basis, Brazilian crops have a higher (115%) yield than Canadian crops.

Now lets evaluate the answer choices.

(A): CORRECT. If Brazilian crops have a lower planted yield than Canadian crops, then the only way for Brazilian crops to have a greater agricultural yield is if a greater portion of every agricultural acre is planted in Brazil than it is in Canada. Imagine this: if both Brazilian crops and Canadian crops had the same planted yield, and Brazil had a greater agricultural yield, we would conclude that this must be because a greater proportion of every acre is planted in Brazil than in Canada. Since the Brazilian planted yield is less than the Canadian yield, this must certainly be true.
(B): This is the wrong inference. It is possible that a majority of acreage in Canada is planted - the only truth, as we saw, is that on a per agricultural acre basis, Canada has a lesser percentage of its acreage planted than Brazil does. It is possible that Canada has 80% of its acreage planted while Brazil has 95% of its acreage planted. Would you call 80% less than a majority? No.
(C): This cannot be inferred. The question discusses yields on a per agricultural acre basis. There is no mention of the total acres of unplanted acreage in Canada or Brazil. It is possible that Canada has a greater number of total planted acres than Brazil does - only they are more sparsely planted than the Brazilian ones. Incorrect.
(D): This is the wrong inference following the logic in option (C) above. Incorrect.
(E): This cannot be inferred - it is possible that Canada produced more crops, even if by using its land less efficiently. Incorrect.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 262
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 397

Re: A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2013, 13:42
Thx you grumpytesttaker ! Your explication helped me a lot ! +1 Kudos !
_________________

Think outside the box

Intern
Intern
Affiliations: Member Senate UoP
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 6
Location: Peshawar
Schools: Harvard
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2013, 02:31
bschool83 wrote:
A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops showed that Brazilian yields are 68% of Canadian yields when compared on the basis of per planted acre. However, Brazilian yields are 115% of Canadian yields when measured per agricultural acre.

Based on this information, which of the following can most reliably be inferred about Brazilian and Canadian agriculture over this time period?

A greater percentage of Canadian agricultural acreage was unplanted than of Brazilian agricultural acreage.
A majority of Canadian acreage is unplanted.
More total acres were unplanted in Canada than in Brazil.
Brazil had more acres planted than unplanted while Canada has more acres unplanted than planted.
Brazil produced more total crops than Canada.


Very good job guys!!!

I just want to know what's your reason to dismiss D as an option.
Re: A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops   [#permalink] 02 Oct 2013, 02:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts A ten year comparison between the US and the Soviet Union in bigtooth81 6 14 Jul 2004, 02:44
New posts Comparisons vshaunak@gmail.com 2 24 Jul 2007, 02:59
New posts Crops Hayabusa 1 06 Nov 2007, 22:57
New posts Comparison between MGMAT and actual GMAT conair83 1 03 May 2011, 17:41
New posts A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops mehulsayani 5 22 Aug 2012, 08:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.