Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 26 Jul 2016, 09:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 138
Location: Boston,MA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 84 [3] , given: 0

A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2007, 18:53
3
KUDOS
21
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:32) correct 42% (02:09) wrong based on 961 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A theory is either true or false. Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account,Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption
that
A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

--gregspirited

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2007, 19:43
gregspirited wrote:
A theory is either true or false. Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account,Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption
that
A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false

between 'C' & 'D'

As the quesiton looks at the argument I will go for 'D'
Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 138
Location: Boston,MA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2007, 19:46
Neither is right according to OA. I went with C
_________________

--gregspirited

Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2007, 20:03
gregspirited wrote:
Neither is right according to OA. I went with C

Then it should be 'B'
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 0

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2007, 22:31
1
KUDOS
E.

While making the argument, the author assumes that if a theory is wrong, then any other inconsistent theory is right. It is however possible that 2 inconsistent theories are both wrong.
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2583
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 356 [2] , given: 0

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2007, 22:52
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
gregspirited wrote:
A theory is either true or false. Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account,Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption
that
A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false

E. lets say the theories can both be false, then the argument falls apart.
Current Student
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2007, 23:49
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
gregspirited wrote:
A theory is either true or false. Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account,Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption
that
A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false

E. lets say the theories can both be false, then the argument falls apart.

E. What's O/A?
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1092
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 407 [0], given: 0

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2007, 01:11
[quote="gregspirited"]A theory is either true or false. Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account,Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption
that
A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false

Because Galileo's theory and Copernican theory prove that the Ptolemaic one is false, they are true. So, if the Ptolemaic theory is false, the Copernican one cannot be false as well. E is correct
Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 138
Location: Boston,MA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2007, 09:11
OA is E
_________________

--gregspirited

Intern
Joined: 03 Aug 2011
Posts: 46
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [1] , given: 17

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2013, 04:09
1
KUDOS
I want to know the meaning of this statement....
"The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption that "
Should we look up for a false assumption? How could we do that?
_________________

Keep your eyes on the prize: 750

Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 854
Followers: 81

Kudos [?]: 222 [1] , given: 61

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2013, 09:50
1
KUDOS
when they say that argument is wrong because of questionable assumption then we have to make that faulty link exposed .and thats exactly what E is doing .in simple terms what is argument saying ? lets say argument makes a claim that X is wrong then it says Y is inconsistent with X then it concludes that Y is right .what is wrong in this argument .that fact that it assumes that two inconsistent things cannot be wrong at the same time .this is what E talks
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 289
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 75

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2013, 04:09
Good Question.

Took me 3 min to ans
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Manager
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Posts: 91
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 6

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2013, 01:39
gregspirited wrote:
A theory is either true or false. Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account,Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption
that
A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false

Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2013
Posts: 25
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 34 [1] , given: 27

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2013, 13:34
1
KUDOS
gregspirited wrote:
A theory is either true or false. Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account,Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption
that
A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false

When Galileo's observation proved Ptolemic theory is false, why was the copernican theory automatically accepted? The passage is assuming that both theories cannot be false.
Current Student
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 11
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.56
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 2

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2013, 08:34
Answer is E. Proving one theory wrong does not mean that every other theory incosistent with the first theory is true.
Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2035
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q0 V
Followers: 51

Kudos [?]: 496 [0], given: 355

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2014, 10:12
Anyone want to elaborate on what's wrong with C here?

Thanks!
Cheers
J
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1966
Followers: 1902

Kudos [?]: 6233 [8] , given: 253

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2014, 09:18
8
KUDOS
Expert's post
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
gregspirited wrote:
A theory is either true or false. Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account,Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption
that
A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false

Hi,

Let me share my two cents here.

The question stem requires us to look for the questionable assumption made by the argument.

Let’s first try to deconstruct the argument:

What is the conclusion here?

Galileo’s observations of Jupiter’s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.

What is the basis of this conclusion?

1) A theory is either true or false. Ptolemaic theory is shown to be false.

2) Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account,

Thus, the argument concludes that Copernican theory is true because it is inconsistent with Ptolemaic theory which is false.
Let’s take an example:

If I say that XYZ flower is red and you say that XYZ flower is blue.

Now, we are inconsistent. Right? But if I am proven wrong i.e. the flower is not red, does that mean that you are correct i.e. the flower is blue? No. The flower could be pink or purple or any other color.

Thus, it is possible that though your answer is inconsistent with mine, it is also wrong.

Similarly, it’s possible that though Copernican theory is inconsistent with Ptolemaic theory, it is also false. However, the conclusion states that Copernican theory is true and thus the in-built assumption of the argument is that if two theories are inconsistent with each other, both of them cannot be false.

With this understanding, let’s look at the option statements:

A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory is false

This statement discusses who should be given the credit to prove that Ptolemaic theory is false. We are given Ptolemaic is false. Who should be given credit is not the focus of the argument. Thus, this choice is incorrect.

B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory

This statements talks about the observations that would be inconsistent with Copernican theory but consistent with Ptolemaic theory. However, we are only concerned with Galileo’s observations in this argument, not other observations. Thus, this choice is an irrelevant and incorrect choice.

C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence

This statement is about the basis of both the theories; however, whether or not these theories are based on the same evidence, the conclusion of the argument is unaffected. In the argument, we are concerned about the impact of one set of observations on the truth of these theories; we don’t know the original basis of any of these theories. Therefore, basis of the theories is not relevant to the argument. Thus, this is an incorrect choice.

D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false

We know from the passage that Galileo’s observations showed that the Ptolemaic theory is false This option tells us that it required numerous counter examples to show this result; however, our task is to look for the assumption that the argument makes while drawing the conclusion about the truthness of Copernican theory. Thus, this choice is incorrect.

E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false

This option identifies with our pre-thinking. The argument fails to consider that despite being inconsistent, both the theories can be false. This choice states the built-in assumption of the argument.

If we negate this option we get,
the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, can both be false

It shows that Copernican can be false, even if it is inconsistent with Ptolemaic theory. As we can see this breaks down the conclusion, this is the correct choice.

Ans is E.

Hope this helps!
Dolly
_________________

1158 reviews | '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

GMAT Pill Representative
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 1988
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 371

Kudos [?]: 1172 [0], given: 8

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2014, 08:29
Expert's post
Received a PM to chime in here:

Use linked chains to understand the logic and WEAKEN the argument. You WEAKEN the argument by identifying what the assumption is.

We have 3 things:
A) Galileo
B) Ptolemaic
C) Copernicus

B = False

Passage says: Since B is bad and we know that C is not the same as B, then it must be that C is true.

Why is this argument flawed?

Just because C is not the same as B -- does not mean that C cannot ALSO be False. What if BOTH (B) and (C) were false? <<--that's the assumption

Assumption = anything that says C is similar to B. Or anything that says B and C cannot both be false.

If the assumption is wrong -- if it's actually possible for both B and C to be wrong -- then the author's whole argument falls apart.

So we look through the answer choice that says something along the lines of what we mentioned above.

(E) says what we want.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2014
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2014, 04:41
P1 :- Galileo proved ptolemaic theory false.

P2 :- Copernican theory inconsistent with ptolemaic

C :- Galileo observation proved truth of Copernican Theory.
th OA is E. Both theories might be inconsistent but we have no proof about either one to be considered false.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8782
Followers: 770

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2015, 13:12
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of   [#permalink] 01 Dec 2015, 13:12

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of 1 08 Aug 2013, 09:59
A mutually exclusive theory is either true or false based on 0 08 Aug 2013, 10:18
From the observation 9 10 Jun 2010, 14:08
1 A theory is either true or false. Galileo's observations of 9 01 Dec 2009, 11:05
cr-theory 3 03 Feb 2007, 10:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by