Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jan 2012, 04:05

2

This post received KUDOS

40

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (02:41) correct
47% (01:43) wrong based on 1018 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?

(1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?

(1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Let the amount invested at x% be \(a\), then the amount invested at y% would be \(60,000-a\).

Given: \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) (we have 3 unknowns \(x\), \(y\), and \(a\)). Question: \(x=?\)

(1) \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\) --> \(y=\frac{4x}{3}\) --> \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) --> still 2 unknowns - \(x\) and \(a\). Not sufficient.

(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 --> \(\frac{a}{60,000-a}=\frac{3}{2}\) --> \(a=36,000\) --> \(36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-36,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) --> still 2 unknowns - \(x\) and \(y\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) and from (2) \(a=36,000\) --> only 1 unknown - \(x\), hence we can solve for it. Sufficient.

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Feb 2012, 19:58

Quote:

Let the amount invested at x% be a, then the amount invested at y% would be 60,000-a.

Given: a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080 (we have 3 unknowns x, y, and a). Question: x=?

(1) x=\frac{3}{4}y --> y=\frac{4x}{3} --> a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080 --> still 2 unknowns - x and a. Not sufficient.

(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 --> \frac{a}{60,000-a}=\frac{3}{2} --> a=36,000 --> 36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-36,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080 --> still 2 unknowns - x and y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080 and from (2) a=36,000 --> only 1 unknown - x, hence we can solve for it. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

Your expert thoughts on a clarification I have got ,

when you have a equation in some problems there is only one solution and we can arrive on a unique value. such that no other values of x or y can satisy that equation.

In the stmt above i spent 30 secs thinking if a unique solution would be available! how do we coem to a conclusion tat there is not unique solution and we can say its not sufficeint like stmt 2?

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Feb 2012, 01:43

Expert's post

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

shankar245 wrote:

Quote:

Let the amount invested at x% be a, then the amount invested at y% would be 60,000-a.

Given: a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080 (we have 3 unknowns x, y, and a). Question: x=?

(1) x=\frac{3}{4}y --> y=\frac{4x}{3} --> a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080 --> still 2 unknowns - x and a. Not sufficient.

(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 --> \frac{a}{60,000-a}=\frac{3}{2} --> a=36,000 --> 36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-36,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080 --> still 2 unknowns - x and y. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080 and from (2) a=36,000 --> only 1 unknown - x, hence we can solve for it. Sufficient.

Hi bunuel,

Your expert thoughts on a clarification I have got ,

when you have a equation in some problems there is only one solution and we can arrive on a unique value. such that no other values of x or y can satisy that equation.

In the stmt above i spent 30 secs thinking if a unique solution would be available! how do we coem to a conclusion tat there is not unique solution and we can say its not sufficeint like stmt 2?

In statement (1) for any value of \(x\) there will exist some \(a\) to satisfy this equation (and vise versa), notice that \(a\) and \(x\) are not integers so we have no restriction on them whatsoever (mathematically we have an equation of a hyperbola and it has infinitely many solutions for x and a). The same for statement (2).

Most of the time when there might be only one solution for two unknowns you'll have linear equation and a restriction that these unknowns can be integers only (Diophantine equation).

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?

(1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

according to stmnt (2) x=3/2, y=2/5.Let A= amount invested in x%,B=60000-A is amount invested in y%.

A(x%)+b(y%)=4080 A(3/5)+(60000-A)(2/5)=4080. if i solve this equation i am getting negative value. Is the above method correct .

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?

(1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

according to stmnt (2) x=3/2, y=2/5.Let A= amount invested in x%,B=60000-A is amount invested in y%.

A(x%)+b(y%)=4080 A(3/5)+(60000-A)(2/5)=4080. if i solve this equation i am getting negative value. Is the above method correct .

The red part is not correct. We are given that the ratio of two amounts is 3 to 2 not the ratio of interest rates. For complete solutions refer to the posts above.

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Jun 2012, 08:24

But when we are breaking it into 2 parts 'a' and '60,000 - a' , wouldn't it matter if i invested 'a' for 2 months or 10 months? The interest amount of 4080 can come for a specific duration only, right?

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Jun 2012, 08:27

Expert's post

ankushgrover wrote:

But when we are breaking it into 2 parts 'a' and '60,000 - a' , wouldn't it matter if i invested 'a' for 2 months or 10 months? The interest amount of 4080 can come for a specific duration only, right?

It follows from the stem that both \(a\) and \(60,000-a\) were invested for one year.

Could someone please explain in detail why A (amount) is taken into the equation? In my mind, when we have x and y %'s this is what we need to calculate the partial amounts as well...?

Bunuel wrote:

Merging similar topics.

TomB wrote:

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?

(1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

according to stmnt (2) x=3/2, y=2/5.Let A= amount invested in x%,B=60000-A is amount invested in y%.

A(x%)+b(y%)=4080 A(3/5)+(60000-A)(2/5)=4080. if i solve this equation i am getting negative value. Is the above method correct .

The red part is not correct. We are given that the ratio of two amounts is 3 to 2 not the ratio of interest rates. For complete solutions refer to the posts above.

Could someone please explain in detail why A (amount) is taken into the equation? In my mind, when we have x and y %'s this is what we need to calculate the partial amounts as well...?

The amount invested at x% is \(a\) and the amount invested at y% is \(60,000-a\). We need to find the value of x. Can you please tell what confuses you here? _________________

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Jul 2013, 06:31

1

This post received KUDOS

Hi guys.

I want to explain my more-abstract solution for this question. A kind of solution one require for answering a DS question in an efficient way.

First lets model what the question put in our table. Consider the part of investment that have x percent interest A and the other part (60k-A). Now what we have is this: Ax+(60k-A)y = 4080

Now lets begin from statement 1: It says that x=(3/4)y. If we put this equation into the original model then we got nothing. Why? because what we got is 1 equation with 2 unknown variables. so cross off statement 1.

Now statement 2: we got A/(60k-A)=3/2. Like the first statement if we plug this equation into original one we still have 1 equation with 2 unknown variables. Now statement 2 is out too.

1+2: from statement 2 we can draw that the 60k investment has 5 part (because the ration of two parts was 3:2) then we can calculate that each part is 12k (60k/5). Now if we plug statement 1 into the original model we got 1 equation with 1 unknown parameter. Problem solved. The answer is C.

My main point here was to stress that for solving DS question try to avoid doing the problem with math concepts only. If you see that you reach to the point that the equation has an unique answer then pick the right answer choice and go ahead!

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2014, 06:54

RadhaKrishnan wrote:

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?

(1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

We're given \(((a)*6000*\frac{x}{100}) + ((1 - a) * 6000 * \frac{y}{100}) = 4080\)

Where a and (1 - a) indicate the fraction of 60,000 that's invested at x and y percent, respectively.

What we really need is NOT the values of a, x, and y, we need a RELATIONSHIP between a and (1 - a) and relationship between x and y

1) Only gives us relationship between x and y, we know nothing about a and (1 - a), insufficient

2) Only gives us relationship of a and (1 - a), we know nothing about the relationship between x and y

1 + 2 we're given both relationships, this is sufficient.

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?

(1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Let the amount invested at x% be \(a\), then the amount invested at y% would be \(60,000-a\).

Given: \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) (we have 3 unknowns \(x\), \(y\), and \(a\)). Question: \(x=?\)

(1) \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\) --> \(y=\frac{4x}{3}\) --> \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) --> still 2 unknowns - \(x\) and \(a\). Not sufficient.

(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 --> \(\frac{a}{60,000-a}=\frac{3}{2}\) --> \(a=36,000\) --> \(36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-36,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) --> still 2 unknowns - \(x\) and \(y\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000-a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) and from (2) \(a=36,000\) --> only 1 unknown - \(x\), hence we can solve for it. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

This makes complete sense in retrospec but I tried to solve using the weighted avg formula:

W1/W2 = A2-Avg/Avg-A1

I realize that the Avg is 6.8% but I was thrown off by the values of W1/W2 and A2, A1. Is w1 and w2 supposed to be the amount that accrues interest rate 1 and 2, or in this case, x and y?

Part 2 of the GMAT: How I tackled the GMAT and improved a disappointing score Apologies for the month gap. I went on vacation and had to finish up a...

I’m a little delirious because I’m a little sleep deprived. But whatever. I have to write this post because... I’M IN! Funnily enough, I actually missed the acceptance phone...

So the last couple of weeks have seen a flurry of discussion in our MBA class Whatsapp group around Brexit, the referendum and currency exchange. Most of us believed...

This highly influential bestseller was first published over 25 years ago. I had wanted to read this book for a long time and I finally got around to it...