Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Aug 2014, 04:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A toy company's engineering department developed a new model

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 14

A toy company's engineering department developed a new model [#permalink] New post 09 Dec 2013, 10:44
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (02:31) correct 30% (01:34) wrong based on 69 sessions
A toy company's engineering department developed a new model of its computerized storyteller lacking educational features present in the earlier model, which was still being produced. During the first year of production of the new model, while both models were being sold, the newer model of the storyteller sold much better than the older model. The CEO of the toy company concluded that educational features were not important in consumers' decisions to purchase the storyteller.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the CEO's conclusion?


Both institutions such as children's hospitals and private individuals purchase storytellers from this toy company.
Many customers consider the new storyteller educational because of certain features, which requires children to learn new skills in order to use it.
Many customers of this toy company also purchased computerized storytellers from toy companies that did provide educational features in their new storytellers.
The new storyteller can be used by all age groups of children that could use the earlier model of the storyteller.
There was no significant difference in price between the newer storyteller and the older model.

what should be approach to solve such question?
what is assumption in stated argument?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 31
GPA: 3.7
WE: Business Development (Retail Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 4

Re: A toy company's engineering department developed a new model [#permalink] New post 09 Dec 2013, 11:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
wastedyouth wrote:
A toy company's engineering department developed a new model of its computerized storyteller lacking educational features present in the earlier model, which was still being produced. During the first year of production of the new model, while both models were being sold, the newer model of the storyteller sold much better than the older model. The CEO of the toy company concluded that educational features were not important in consumers' decisions to purchase the storyteller.


1. New model ---- Lacks educational features , which was present in earlier model.

2. New model sold better than older model.


3. CEO Claims - Educational features were not important.


Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the CEO's conclusion?

So we have to attack/weaken - " The CEO of the toy company concluded that educational features were not important in consumers' decisions to purchase the storyteller. "

1.Both institutions such as children's hospitals and private individuals purchase storytellers from this toy company.

Out of scope.

2. Many customers consider the new storyteller educational because of certain features, which requires children to learn new skills in order to use it.

Presents some new features which the new model is offering , which requires development of new skill sets which the earlier model was lacking in the earlier model.
May be that the perceived value of the new model is considered more than the earlier model , hence boosting sales...

This statement directly attacks the highlighted part -

" The CEO of the toy company concluded that educational features were not important in consumers' decisions to purchase the storyteller. "

Educational features are important also the model is providing better features and development of new skill sets...

3.Many customers of this toy company also purchased computerized storytellers from toy companies that did provide educational features in their new storytellers

Out of scope

4. The new storyteller can be used by all age groups of children that could use the earlier model of the storyteller.

Out of scope and not at all weakening the Argument.

5.There was no significant difference in price between the newer storyteller and the older model.

Price is not under consideration , the CEO places his argument on the educational features of the model... This option fails to touch the arguement , hence rejected..


Hence Option (B) fits in accurately..
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 159
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 76 [1] , given: 2

Re: A toy company's engineering department developed a new model [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2013, 04:41
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hello @Wastedyouth
Here is the general approach to CR questions
1. Read the question : identify question type
2. Read and analyze the argument
3. Pre-guess the answer; or at least figure out what the correct answer must do
4. Eliminate incorrect and irrelevant answer choices

In this case:
1. This is a weaken question, we need to find out the assumption of the argument to work with it.
2. Let's see what the assumptions could be:
Facts: newer model doesn't have educational features that older one had : newer model sold better.
Conclusion: Educational features not important in purchasing decision
Let's find out what seem off about this reasoning..
The wordings "new model of its computerized storyteller lacking educational features present in the earlier model"
betray a logical flaw: The author assumes lack of edu features present in older model = NO edu features at all!
Perhaps there were new edu features in the new toy? and perhaps this was why the toys sold better?

Option B directly introduces this detracting evidence and therefore questions the validity of the author's conclusion best.

Hope that helped,
Ajeeth Peo
Verbal Trainer,
Crack Verbal
_________________

If you find our response valuable, please encourage us with Kudos!

Live online classes by 99th percentile instructors!
http://gmat.crackverbal.com/gmat-courses/online/gmat-live-course/

Get a FREE profile evaluation from CrackVerbal experts!
http://applications.crackverbal.com/free-resources/profile-evaluation/

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 14

Re: A toy company's engineering department developed a new model [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2013, 11:20
Abhishek009 wrote:
wastedyouth wrote:
A toy company's engineering department developed a new model of its computerized storyteller lacking educational features present in the earlier model, which was still being produced. During the first year of production of the new model, while both models were being sold, the newer model of the storyteller sold much better than the older model. The CEO of the toy company concluded that educational features were not important in consumers' decisions to purchase the storyteller.


1. New model ---- Lacks educational features , which was present in earlier model.

2. New model sold better than older model.


3. CEO Claims - Educational features were not important.


Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the CEO's conclusion?

So we have to attack/weaken - " The CEO of the toy company concluded that educational features were not important in consumers' decisions to purchase the storyteller. "

1.Both institutions such as children's hospitals and private individuals purchase storytellers from this toy company.

Out of scope.

2. Many customers consider the new storyteller educational because of certain features, which requires children to learn new skills in order to use it.

Presents some new features which the new model is offering , which requires development of new skill sets which the earlier model was lacking in the earlier model.
May be that the perceived value of the new model is considered more than the earlier model , hence boosting sales...

This statement directly attacks the highlighted part -

" The CEO of the toy company concluded that educational features were not important in consumers' decisions to purchase the storyteller. "

Educational features are important also the model is providing better features and development of new skill sets...

3.Many customers of this toy company also purchased computerized storytellers from toy companies that did provide educational features in their new storytellers

Out of scope

4. The new storyteller can be used by all age groups of children that could use the earlier model of the storyteller.

Out of scope and not at all weakening the Argument.

5.There was no significant difference in price between the newer storyteller and the older model.

Price is not under consideration , the CEO places his argument on the educational features of the model... This option fails to touch the arguement , hence rejected..


Hence Option (B) fits in accurately..



Many customers consider the new storyteller educational because of certain features, which requires children to learn new skills in order to use it.
It is not weakening the conclusion, in fact it supports conclusion by stating that education features were not important rather some other feature (which required...) were important because of which consumer bought it

Rather Many customers of this toy company also [u]purchased computerized storytellers from toy companies that did provide educational features in their new storytellers seems better choice as it proves that educational features were important, that is why many on its customer bought it from somewhere else in addition to their product.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1628
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 254

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A toy company's engineering department developed a new model [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2014, 06:49
wastedyouth wrote:
A toy company's engineering department developed a new model of its computerized storyteller lacking educational features present in the earlier model, which was still being produced. During the first year of production of the new model, while both models were being sold, the newer model of the storyteller sold much better than the older model. The CEO of the toy company concluded that educational features were not important in consumers' decisions to purchase the storyteller.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the CEO's conclusion?


Both institutions such as children's hospitals and private individuals purchase storytellers from this toy company.
Many customers consider the new storyteller educational because of certain features, which requires children to learn new skills in order to use it.
Many customers of this toy company also purchased computerized storytellers from toy companies that did provide educational features in their new storytellers.
The new storyteller can be used by all age groups of children that could use the earlier model of the storyteller.
There was no significant difference in price between the newer storyteller and the older model.

what should be approach to solve such question?
what is assumption in stated argument?


I guess that B and D are close contenders, but D is more straight. It says that they really care about educational features cause they are buying the new model for their children to learn new skills in order to use it

Hope this helps
Cheers!
J :)
Re: A toy company's engineering department developed a new model   [#permalink] 12 Jan 2014, 06:49
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 New items developed for automobiles in the 1997 model year KC 27 21 Oct 2006, 15:56
New items developed for automobiles in the 1997 model year jerrywu 10 09 Sep 2006, 12:35
New items developed for automobiles in the 1997 model year scgmat 6 03 Aug 2006, 17:16
New items developed for automobies in the 1997 model year IWT801 9 08 Dec 2005, 17:50
The inventor of a new toy offers the Kiddy Toy Company aikido_fudoshin 3 23 Nov 2005, 15:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A toy company's engineering department developed a new model

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.