Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 04 Dec 2013, 18:41

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A tree s age can be determined by counting the annual growth

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 272
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

A tree s age can be determined by counting the annual growth [#permalink]  13 Jan 2007, 21:53
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
A treeâ€™s age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ringâ€™s thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.
Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologistsâ€™ success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?
(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombsâ€™ remaining artifacts.
(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.
(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.
(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.
(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artifacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago.
Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 736
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Re: cr- tree's age [#permalink]  13 Jan 2007, 23:27
AK47 wrote:
A treeâ€™s age can be determined by counting the annual growth rings in its trunk. Each ring represents one year, and the ringâ€™s thickness reveals the relative amount of rainfall that year. Archaeologists successfully used annual rings to determine the relative ages of ancient tombs at Pazyryk. Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs, and the tombs builders were constrained by tradition to use only logs from trees growing in the sacred Pazyryk Valley.
Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the archaeologistsâ€™ success in using annual rings to establish the relative ages of the tombs at the Pazyryk site?
(A) The Pazyryk tombs were all robbed during ancient times, but breakage of the tombs seals allowed the seepage of water, which soon froze permanently, thereby preserving the tombsâ€™ remaining artifacts.
(B) The Pazyryk Valley, surrounded by extremely high mountains, has a distinctive yearly pattern of rainfall, and so trees growing in the Pazyryk Valley have annual rings that are quite distinct from trees growing in nearby valleys.
(C) Each log in the Pazyryk tombs has among its rings a distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings representing six drought years followed by three rainy years and three more drought years.

Determining relative ages of tombs is possible based on the number of years after which logs were cut, after that distinctive sequence of twelve annual rings. All the logs in Pazyryk tombs have that distinctive sequence. So assuming that all the tombs have logs, the relative ages of all the tombs can be determined.

(D) The archaeologists determined that the youngest tree used in any of the tombs was 90 years old and that the oldest tree was 450 years old.
(E) All of the Pazyryk tombs contained cultural artifacts that can be dated to roughly 2300 years ago.
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 756
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  13 Jan 2007, 23:55
C !
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  14 Jan 2007, 08:34
Question

If all it is required to determine age is number of rings then how does having drought years, rainy years, drought years help?

if I have 12 + 6 + 3 + 3 = 24 years

If you cut anytime
number of rings = number of years.
Why do we need drought or rainy years to find relative age

I am not convinced with other choices though
_________________

AimHigher

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 736
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

[#permalink]  14 Jan 2007, 08:52
AimHigher wrote:
Question

If all it is required to determine age is number of rings then how does having drought years, rainy years, drought years help?

if I have 12 + 6 + 3 + 3 = 24 years

If you cut anytime
number of rings = number of years.
Why do we need drought or rainy years to find relative age

I am not convinced with other choices though

with the number of rings we get age of logs. But how can the relative age of tomb be decided then?
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  14 Jan 2007, 09:07
Each tomb was constructed from freshly cut logs. Isn't this sufficient to find age of tombs

ex.

one tomb is made of logs having 14 rings

another is built with logs having 16 rings

relative age can be determined based on # of rings, buy why the type of rings
_________________

AimHigher

Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 85
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  14 Jan 2007, 13:06
C.

We can get some kind of measure of time if we remove some of the sugar coating
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 85
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  14 Jan 2007, 13:07
C.

We can get some kind of measure of time if we remove some of the sugar coating
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 272
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  16 Jan 2007, 00:50
OA IS C
Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  17 Jan 2007, 00:21
Agree with "C"
[#permalink] 17 Jan 2007, 00:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 A tree's age can be determined by counting the annual growth 17 09 Aug 2004, 01:58
A tree s age can be determined by counting the annual growth 5 10 May 2005, 15:27
Q1: A tree s age can be determined by counting the annual 3 27 May 2007, 15:34
A tree s age can be determined by counting the annual growth 3 13 Feb 2008, 05:02
A tree s age can be determined by counting the annual growth 10 24 Feb 2008, 08:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A tree s age can be determined by counting the annual growth

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.