Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Sep 2014, 09:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A U.S. car company reported a 2004 second-quarter net income

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 291
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
A U.S. car company reported a 2004 second-quarter net income [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2008, 08:22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
A U.S. car company reported a 2004 second-quarter net income of $450 million, compared with $350 million in the second quarter of 2003. This increase was realized despite a drop in car sales at the end of the year due to a weakening economy and rising interest rates.
Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to an explanation of the increase in the manufacturer ’s net income?
A. During the second quarter of 2004, the manufacturer announced a new convertible in its line of products.
B. In the second quarter of 2004, the manufacturer paid no wages during a six-week strike, but on-hand stock was adequate to supply dealers.
C. This particular car company does most of its business outside the U.S..
D. Official dealers of the manufacturer had low supplies during the second quarter of 2004.
E. The company instituted a large incentive program to offer financial discounts in the second quarter of 2004.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Feb 2008
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR -U.S. car company [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2008, 08:44
E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR -U.S. car company [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2008, 12:30
IMO C,

A U.S. car company reported a 2004 second-quarter net income of $450 million, compared with $350 million in the second quarter of 2003. This increase was realized despite a drop in car sales at the end of the year due to a weakening economy and rising interest rates.
Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to an explanation of the increase in the manufacturer ’s net income?
A. During the second quarter of 2004, the manufacturer announced a new convertible in its line of products.
Great, so???
B. In the second quarter of 2004, the manufacturer paid no wages during a six-week strike, but on-hand stock was adequate to supply dealers.
hmm, well income is different from revenue. This would have helped revenue build up, nothing on the income side...
C. This particular car company does most of its business outside the U.S..
True, the tricky use of the word 'weakening economy' specifies sales within a country, so if cars were sold elsewhere, where the economy was booming.....hell yea...sales would increase and so would income...
D. Official dealers of the manufacturer had low supplies during the second quarter of 2004.
counter productive
E. The company instituted a large incentive program to offer financial discounts in the second quarter of 2004.
discounts are bad in this case....would lead to a decrease in income unless it is countered by an increase in sales which is not the case!! BOOM!!
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1593
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR -U.S. car company [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2008, 18:11
i picked C as well ....
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 291
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR -U.S. car company [#permalink] New post 29 Jun 2008, 20:00
I posted this Q as I had got this one wrong in my practice with Score800 tests.

OA is B.

I had answered A.

For me, this Q was stupid and I don't agree with OA. What do u guys say.

OE:
(B) During a strike where no wages were paid, the company ’s expenses would drop considerably. So long as the dealers had inventory, the sales would proceed normally. Thus, the company ’s sales should be constant with decreasing expenses. This would produce a net profit increase despite the weakening economy and poor sales. Choices (A), (D), and (E) aren ’t relevant to the issue of 2003/2004 profit comparisons. Choice (C) could explain a net increase in profit despite the economy, but only if the international sales increased enough to counteract the poor sales in the U.S., which we have no evidence to conclude. The best answer is (B).

Do you agree ???
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR -U.S. car company [#permalink] New post 30 Jun 2008, 07:26
But that isn't income....well when you ask someone what's your income, he/she would not say...well I get about $4000 and i save $2000...hence my income is $6000..??? The correlation between income and revenue is not valid with option B.... :shock: :shock:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 18
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: CR -U.S. car company [#permalink] New post 30 Jun 2008, 09:31
For me it was apparent that the answer for B and I think the explanation is pretty good. The long term outlook for the company might suffer but for that particular quarter the lower wages would result in a positive "NET" revenue


huntgmat wrote:
I posted this Q as I had got this one wrong in my practice with Score800 tests.

OA is B.

I had answered A.

For me, this Q was stupid and I don't agree with OA. What do u guys say.

OE:
(B) During a strike where no wages were paid, the company ’s expenses would drop considerably. So long as the dealers had inventory, the sales would proceed normally. Thus, the company ’s sales should be constant with decreasing expenses. This would produce a net profit increase despite the weakening economy and poor sales. Choices (A), (D), and (E) aren ’t relevant to the issue of 2003/2004 profit comparisons. Choice (C) could explain a net increase in profit despite the economy, but only if the international sales increased enough to counteract the poor sales in the U.S., which we have no evidence to conclude. The best answer is (B).

Do you agree ???
Re: CR -U.S. car company   [#permalink] 30 Jun 2008, 09:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Reporting a 90 percent drop in net income during pjaseem 4 01 Aug 2013, 04:17
2 The computer company reported strong second-quarter earnings abhijit_sen 9 27 Jul 2008, 20:36
A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported M8 9 25 Apr 2006, 11:16
ds - net income christoph 6 27 Dec 2005, 09:39
A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported Tanmoi 2 28 Nov 2005, 06:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A U.S. car company reported a 2004 second-quarter net income

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.