A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 05:27

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 14 Nov 2007
Posts: 44
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Nov 2007, 16:24
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false. A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion. From these definitions we can infer that…

A. Every circular argument is valid as long as its premises are true.
B. Every valid argument is circular.
C. No circular argument is valid.
D. Some circular arguments are valid, and some are not.
E. Some circular arguments are not valid, and some valid arguments are not circular.

Please post explanations. This one makes me dizzy!!!!
If you have any questions
New!
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2583
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 409 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Argument (Hard one!) [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Nov 2007, 19:14
finder_003 wrote:
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not possible for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false. A circular argument is sometimes defined as one in which one of the premises is identical to the conclusion. From these definitions we can infer that…

A. Every circular argument is valid as long as its premises are true.
B. Every valid argument is circular.
C. No circular argument is valid.
D. Some circular arguments are valid, and some are not.
E. Some circular arguments are not valid, and some valid arguments are not circular.

Please post explanations. This one makes me dizzy!!!!

I would go with E.
Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

19 Nov 2007, 20:58
i take E.
in a circular argument, if the premise is true than the conclusion is true, let it be that premise is the same as conclusion (Vaild argument). However circular argument can also be false if the premise is false than the conclusion is also false(invaild argument). So some circular argument can be vaild and some are not.
Intern
Joined: 14 Nov 2007
Posts: 44
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

20 Nov 2007, 08:17
E is what I thought as well.

But the OA is A!!!!

Can anyone please please post a detailed explanation of why A could possibly be right??
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

20 Nov 2007, 12:02
I went for A..let me explain how
for valid argument..
if all premises==true then conclusion != false

for circular argument
one of the premise = conclusion

therefore if all the premises are true..then for a circular argument one of those premises will be the conclusion and as all the premises are true => the conclusion is also true.
Hence if all the premises are true a circular argument is a valid argument ! !!
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The argument is based on which assumption 0 19 Jun 2016, 02:03
CR- which weakens the argument 5 14 Aug 2015, 07:45
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not 4 28 Jul 2010, 22:24
A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not 12 02 Dec 2008, 00:07
25 A valid argument is often defined as one in which it is not 37 28 Jun 2008, 23:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by