Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 03 Sep 2015, 04:57
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 294
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [1] , given: 0

A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink] New post 31 May 2005, 23:49
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

79% (02:27) correct 21% (00:47) wrong based on 24 sessions
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that rgion is more than
C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5067
Location: Singapore
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2005, 00:31
A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
- more numerous is not idiomatic

B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that rgion is more than
- B changes the meaning of the sentence.

C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
- 'was' is the wrong tense

D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than

E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than
- more numerous is not idiomatic

D is the best
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 85
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2005, 01:49
Yes, D is the best answer.

“…predicts…will fail…â€
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 853
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2005, 01:38
C is out - as it is a prediction, would/will is more appropriate rather than should (OG: 73)

Density is a measure, it cannot be numerous - eliminate A & E

I am not clear on the construction used in B - Would appreciate if someone can elaborate it

IMO D should be it though I am not able to refute B for now.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 294
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2005, 04:22
Thanks all. OA is indeed D. B fails in use of would - disagrees with other verbs in tense and mood (OG).

I had a concern in the OA, isn't the sentence in a subjunctie mood? And if so don't we need a were in
if the density ... is greater

Can someone please explain why isn't why isn't a subjunctive mood used here?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 726
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2005, 07:43
I dont thin it is subjuctive mood. It is cause and effect. If that happen(s), this (will) happen. e.g.

I will fail if I do not study.

Subjunctive mood is applied when the author seems to indicate that his statements have very low probability to be true and seems to indicate a wish. e.g.

If I were you, I would study hard.

Hope it helps.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 167
Location: Atlanta , GA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2005, 19:42
Answer has to be D.

in "If " sentences : if the conditional clause is in present tense , the following clause has to be in future tense.

So will should be used.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2005, 13:15
Vithal wrote:
C is out - as it is a prediction, would/will is more appropriate rather than should (OG: 73)

Density is a measure, it cannot be numerous - eliminate A & E

I am not clear on the construction used in B - Would appreciate if someone can elaborate it

IMO D should be it though I am not able to refute B for now.


Much/More are used for uncountable nouns. With density being a "countable" noun, you'll need greater than.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 853
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2005, 13:29
gmataquaguy wrote:
Vithal wrote:
C is out - as it is a prediction, would/will is more appropriate rather than should (OG: 73)

Density is a measure, it cannot be numerous - eliminate A & E

I am not clear on the construction used in B - Would appreciate if someone can elaborate it

IMO D should be it though I am not able to refute B for now.


Much/More are used for uncountable nouns. With density being a "countable" noun, you'll need greater than.


I don't think density is countable - countable being "one that can be counted - not one that can be quantified"
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2760
Location: New York City
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 422 [0], given: 4

 [#permalink] New post 06 Aug 2007, 09:58
gmataquaguy wrote:
Vithal wrote:
C is out - as it is a prediction, would/will is more appropriate rather than should (OG: 73)

Density is a measure, it cannot be numerous - eliminate A & E

I am not clear on the construction used in B - Would appreciate if someone can elaborate it

IMO D should be it though I am not able to refute B for now.


Much/More are used for uncountable nouns. With density being a "countable" noun, you'll need greater than.

density is NOT countable. 1 density, 2 density, 3 density.... :evil:

the part that makes E wrong is timber wolf density rather than density of the timber wolf population.

Princeton Review talks about modifiers with the massive toad infestation vs. massive infestation of toads example
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1824
Location: New York
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 593 [0], given: 5

Re: SC: Timber wolf [#permalink] New post 30 May 2008, 13:36
sonaketu wrote:
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.

A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that rgion is more than
C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than



A- Wrong reasons
(1) "would fail ... if density is "<--Wrong structure it should be "will fail ... if density is "
(2) more numerous --wrong
B - changed the meaning .. looks like some one is providing the density here.
C - "Should fail .. if was " wrong structure should "would fail" .. if was
D -- correct
E) wrong more numerous
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5109
Followers: 529

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2015, 17:33
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the   [#permalink] 24 Aug 2015, 17:33
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the shikhar 4 29 Feb 2012, 06:16
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the metallicafan 16 31 Jan 2012, 15:36
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the rajeshaaidu 9 08 Mar 2011, 21:38
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the Prax 2 05 Jun 2010, 10:02
A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the agsfaltex 7 09 Aug 2006, 12:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.