Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 11:13 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 11:13

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618982 [13]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2020
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [7]
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2017
Posts: 192
Own Kudos [?]: 359 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
WE:Programming (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 11 Aug 2016
Posts: 335
Own Kudos [?]: 351 [2]
Given Kudos: 97
Send PM
Re: A year after the start an experiment to decrease crime in two high-cri [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
[quote="Bunuel"]A year after the start an experiment to decrease crime in two high-crime subway stations by the installation of closed-circuit televisions, the experiment is being discontinued, city officials say the program has led to an increase in crime, citing the fact that following the installation, both stations showed increases in the number of crimes reported.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the claim of the city officials that the program has led to an increase in crime?


(A) The two subway stations had been chosen on the basis subway stations was higher than that of other high-crime subway stations not equipped with closed-circuit-television.
Does not impact our conclusion that there was an INCREASE in crime.Drop It.

(B) The rate of increase in crimes reported for two subway stations was higher than that of other high-crime subway stations not equipped with closed-circuit television.
This answer Choice does resonate with the thinking of City Officials that there was an increase in crime. Strengthens the claim. Drop it.

(C) The percentage of all crimes committed at the two subway stations that were reported rose as a result of increased instances of observations of crime on the closed-circuit televisions.
[b]Bingo. Shows that there was an increase in crime, but the reason being increased surveillance rather than the actual increase in the no. Keep it.[/b]

(D) The year in which the experiment was conducted was a year in which the total number of crimes reported in the city fell.
Irrelevant. Drop It.

(E) Closed-circuit televisions installed in shops and stores throughout the city have proved to be useful in the prevention of shoplifting and burglaries.
Irrelevant. Drop it.

Answer: C
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17220
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A year after the start an experiment to decrease crime in two high-cri [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A year after the start an experiment to decrease crime in two high-cri [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne