Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 07:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 919
Followers: 52

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 17

Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2009, 21:26
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

32% (01:56) correct 68% (00:53) wrong based on 245 sessions
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.

Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?

(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise.
(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes.
(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers.
(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.
(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

math-polygons-87336.html
competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 2

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2009, 22:02
nitya34 wrote:
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.

Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?

(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise.
(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes.
(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers.
(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.
(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.


E
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2006
Posts: 117
Location: Next to Google
Schools: Haas School of Business
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 3

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 24 Feb 2009, 22:24
The answer is C. I had already read this on another forum and seeing your post reminded me of it. Here is the link http://www.beatthegmat.com/1000-cr-t3249.html
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Dec 2008
Posts: 64
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 25 Feb 2009, 01:02
E is the inference that can be drawn from the stimulus.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Jan 2009
Posts: 6
Schools: rowan university
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 27 Feb 2009, 18:43
No doubt, E is the best choice.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2009, 02:11
It shld be E indeed
nitya34 wrote:
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.

Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?

(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise.
(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes.
(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers.
(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.
(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 497
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 13

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2009, 08:53
nitya34 wrote:
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.

Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?

(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise.
(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes.
(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers.
(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.
(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.


Hi mates,

I really find difficult to choose between C and E, however I'd go with C

If taxes are removed, real taxpayers will find that their incomes increase. If public employees find that their incomes decrease, that means that public employees are not real taxpayers.

I've not picked C because it doesn't say anything about real taxpayers, which are an important element of the structure.

However, it's true that C sounds very well... If I find a question like this... well, I'll flip a coin :x

OA and Source?

Cheers
_________________

mates, please visit my profile and leave comments
johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package :)

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1578
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2009, 17:01
I will go with C. I find E weak. It talks about payment to public employees. Payment may not be the only source of income. The argument talks about the income of these employees.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2009, 22:22
But argument mentions "abolish taxez and the income disappears". If there were other sources other than taxes, then how cum income disappears?
scthakur wrote:
I will go with C. I find E weak. It talks about payment to public employees. Payment may not be the only source of income. The argument talks about the income of these employees.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 256
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2009, 22:42
All choices except C and E are irrelevant.
I choose C, because it cannot be concluded from the context that public employees could not be paid from sources other than taxes, so E is not the best choice.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 919
Followers: 52

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 17

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2009, 22:44
Its from LSAT series
OA-C
++++++++
request to you all Posters
pls post the OA within 8-10 discussions/24 hrs
do we have spoiler here?
++++++++++++++++
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.
Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?
(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise.
(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes.
(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers.
(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.
(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.


nookway wrote:
The answer is C. I had already read this on another forum and seeing your post reminded me of it. Here is the link http://www.beatthegmat.com/1000-cr-t3249.html

_________________

math-polygons-87336.html
competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 113
Schools: MIT LGO (Admitted), Harvard (Admitted))
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 01 Jan 2010, 06:25
nitya34 wrote:
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.

Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?

(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise.
(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes.
(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers.
(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.
(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
C

POE:
A is wrong; B is not true from the information given; C is not true, we don't know if Public employees pay taxes or not and their disposable income could have gone up as the other taxpayers while their total income is going down; D is wrong;

I think E is the best.
_________________

Dream the impossible and do the incredible.

Live. Love. Laugh.

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 178
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 53 [1] , given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2010, 06:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise. irrelevant
(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes. illogical
(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers. chances are there waitlisted
(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.irrelevant
(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.comes close

I think C and E are more relevant to the question but between C and E I chose E because from the statement it is obvious that if taxes are abolished public employees wouldn't have any income

and also the above statement doesn't clearly states that pubilc employee are not real tax payers
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 55
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2010, 16:54
IMO E. Since the two statements imply that taxes are the source of income for public employees
_________________

A kudos would greatly help :)

Tuhin

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2009
Posts: 107
Location: United States
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [3] , given: 5

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2010, 10:51
3
This post received
KUDOS
It's gotta be C as E doesn't use the information from both statements. It only uses the information from the second statement. The stimulus says which conclusion comes from using both statements and only C does this.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2010, 12:02
I will go with C.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 193
Location: Anchorage, AK
Schools: Mellon, USC, MIT, UCLA, NSCU
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 10

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2010, 17:39
Finally... a CR question that I asked correctly. I chose C over B. I don't why I re-read B a few times more than necessary. I guess I wanted to be sure about my choice.

Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

Reward wisdom with kudos. ;)

1 KUDOS received
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Other
GPA: 3.64
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 70 [1] , given: 78626

CAT Tests
Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 07 Jan 2011, 06:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
I chose E but changed to C since, we have to consider both statments, choice E only considers the last statment. Additionally E is more of an inference other than a conclusion.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 07 Jan 2011, 06:23
1
This post received
KUDOS
nitya34 wrote:
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their disposable incomes have increased. Abolish taxes, and public employees would find that their incomes have disappeared.

Which one of the following is a logical conclusion that depends on information in both of the statements above?

(A) Public offices should be abolished so that disposable incomes will rise.
(B) The only real taxpayers are those who would have more to spend if they did not pay taxes.
(C) Public employees are not real taxpayers.
(D) Public employees’ incomes should not be taxed since they come from taxes.
(E) If there were no taxes, then public employees could not be paid.


E is very close but the question is very tricky, so take into account this:

It is true that E can be logically derived from the second statement. The issue here is that the question is asking for a logical conclusion that depends on both statements. E only depends on the second statement and the first does not provide any informations relevant to conclude E

C on the other hand is a conclusion that depends on both statements:

(Please excuse my english, these are not formal logic procedures but they provide a general idea)
Lets suppose real tax payers are public employees
Supposition: x is a real tax payer <-> x is a public employee
Taxes are abolished -> y is a real tax payer ^ y has its disposable income increased
Taxes are abolished -> z is a public employee ^ z has its income dessapear
Lets take the person A, A is a real tax payer
Taxes are abolished then:
A is a real tax payer ^ A has its disposable income increased
A is a public employee ^ A has its disposable income increased
But also
A is a public employee ^ A has its income dessapear
So A has its disposable income increased ^ A has its income dessapear

Since we reached a contradiction we conclude that real tax payers cannot be public employees since disposable income cannot increase if the income dissapears.

We reach a contradiction that depend on both statements to proof. Answer E is also right, but it is not what the question is asking, be careful with tricky questions.

RegardsRegards

Last edited by cvargasm on 07 Jan 2011, 06:28, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Abolish taxes [#permalink] New post 07 Jan 2011, 06:29
I went with E.

The premise states that public employees salaries are funded with taxes (other possibilities like debt are slashed away).

However, public employees may have sources of rent (different from income) which may be taxable, converting them into real tax payers.
Re: CR-Abolish taxes   [#permalink] 07 Jan 2011, 06:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their tenaman10 7 17 Jun 2009, 06:39
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their kripalkavi 14 28 Jan 2007, 20:24
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their mailtheguru 7 04 Aug 2006, 08:54
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their hkm_gmat 10 29 Dec 2005, 10:51
Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their WinWinMBA 10 06 May 2005, 14:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Abolish taxes, and real taxpayers would find that their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 33 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.