In general, |a| = a when a is positive (or zero). When a is negative, then |a| = -a (because a is negative, -a will be positive). So if you see an expression like |x + 3|, there are two possibilities:
x + 3 >
0, so x >
-3, in which case |x + 3| = x + 3
x + 3 < 0, so x < -3, in which case |x + 3| = -(x + 3)
When you break your problem into cases, you seem to be ignoring the assumptions you're making - that is, in the positive case, you're assuming in advance that x >
-3, so you shouldn't be including any solutions less than -3 when you look only at that case.
Now, when you solve an equation like |x + 3| = 5, you can certainly break the problem into two cases. The 'positive case' is straightforward. In the negative case (where x < -3), we replace |x + 3| with -(x + 3). We then have
-(x + 3) = 5
Notice that since we can multiply an equation safely on both sides by -1, we can rewrite this as follows:
x + 3 = -5
We can *only* do this with an equation. If we instead had an inequality like |x + 3| < 5, then when we consider the 'negative case' where x < -3, we can still replace |x + 3| with -(x + 3) to get
-(x + 3) < 5
Notice however that we are *not* free to instead put the negative sign on the right side of the inequality. To do that, we'd need to multiply both sides by -1, and when you multiply on both sides of an inequality by a negative number, you need to *reverse* the inequality. That was the problem with your second solution.
All of that said, I don't like case-by-case approaches to absolute value. If you understand that |a - b| is the distance between a and b on the number line, then you can interpret the expression |x + 3| = |x - (-3)| as the distance between x and -3. So if |x - (-3)| is less than 4, then x is less than 4 away from -3, so must be between -7 and 1.
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com