According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion s : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 04:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 154
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2009, 21:27
The error in reasoning of the author is that "all" suntan lotions will have to be applied the same way. Therefore, according to him, it does not matter what the strength of the lotion is. But is that right? Does it not make sense that a stronger lotion may not be required to be applied in the amounts that a weaker lotion would be required to and also not applied as often as the weaker lotion? If the answer to this is "yes" then the answer clearly is D and not C. C seems to be more of a flaw than an error in REASONING.
SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2492
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 734 [0], given: 19

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2009, 22:22
Fistail wrote:
According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPF, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.

Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?

(A) It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.
(B) Because some people get sunburned more easily than others, the fact that there are different SPFs cannot be ignored.
(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.
(D) It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions require the same application.
(E) There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.

(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.

Agree with C.
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 231
Schools: Life
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2009, 00:06
Fistail wrote:
According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPF, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.

Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?

(A) It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.
(B) Because some people get sunburned more easily than others, the fact that there are different SPFs cannot be ignored.
(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.
(D) It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions require the same application.
(E) There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.

C for me. It breaks down the argument's error and makes sense the most: just because you need to apply it more than once doesn't mean that all SPF is the same.
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 282
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2009, 01:01
Fistail wrote:
According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPF, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.

Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?

(A) It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.
(B) Because some people get sunburned more easily than others, the fact that there are different SPFs cannot be ignored.
(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.
(D) It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions require the same application.
(E) There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.

A - No such assumption is ever made
B - Ignored? Some people? Not discussed
D - Same application?
E - Manufacturers?
Re: CR: Suntan Lotion   [#permalink] 10 Jan 2009, 01:01

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 According to a recent study, advertisements in medical journals often 4 03 Apr 2016, 03:59
14 Advertisement: According to a recent research study, daily 46 02 Sep 2011, 05:46
The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal 0 10 Mar 2013, 13:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by