Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 16:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion s

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 899
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 7

According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion s [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2007, 19:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPF, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.

Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?

(A) It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.
(B) Because some people get sunburned more easily than others, the fact that there are different SPFs cannot be ignored.
(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.
(D) It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions require the same application.
(E) There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 54 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR: Suntan Lotion [#permalink] New post 21 Dec 2008, 03:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
X = SPF

Fact: --> SPF is there.(X)

Conclusion:--> If lotion to be used, then it has to be used.(Y)
So SPF is not needed.(Z)

There is no correlation between Y and Z, which the argument is trying to do.

This point is taken into consideration only by (C)
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 54 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR: Suntan Lotion [#permalink] New post 21 Dec 2008, 03:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
This question is similar to Brushing question and commonly observed pattern :cool :
Better to get equipped with all of them to kill all :snipersmile:

11-p552548?t=26839#p552548
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2007, 19:45
is the answer C? it seems to be the only answer that doesn't fall out of scope.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 185
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2007, 23:42
I think its D
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 01:07
I think D is the one. If it is not application that is the key factor, then SPF must be it.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 586
Location: Canada eh
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 01:24
C

not D because nowhere does he mention anything where he says applying the suntan lotion is the same for all

He's saying

1. advertisements say that SPF is important
2. But because you have to do X, Y and Z (REQUIREMENTS)
3. Because of 2, SPF is useless.

Which is absurd.

C
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 03:15
Not totally convinced. OA please
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 385
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 07:35
I feel C too
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 867
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 07:43
straight C
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 899
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: Suntan Lotion [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 07:47
Thanks guys, OA given is C. I am not also convinced. therefore I posted it to get your opinion.

I went to D and still think it should be D not C.



Fistail wrote:
According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPF, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.

Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?

(A) It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.
(B) Because some people get sunburned more easily than others, the fact that there are different SPFs cannot be ignored.
(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.
(D) It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions require the same application.
(E) There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 179
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 07:52
My take is answer C.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 867
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 07:54
OK, let's pretend the answer is D then.

Why is it unreasonable to assume suntan lotions have the same requirements for application?

1. You have to remember to put it on before going into the sun. I think it's fair to assume suntan lotions won't work if you don't use them.

2. Put on an adequate amount to cover the skin. If you don't use an adequate amount it won't work as well as it should...this makes sense right?

3. Reapply it as needed. Sure, some lotions won't need to be reapplied and others will need to be reapplied every hour...but since it as "as needed" it can vary by product. It's safe to assume that you must reapply it if you need to, right?


Nothing the passage says about the application of suntan lotions is unreasonable to assume about all suntan lotions. it would be unreasonable if the passage said "and you must reapply it every 30 minutes" but everything they suggest is open to flexibility between brands.

D just doesn't make any sense any way you look at it. Even if you pretend it's correct.

C is the clear choice here.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 08:42
eschn3am wrote:
OK, let's pretend the answer is D then.

Why is it unreasonable to assume suntan lotions have the same requirements for application?

1. You have to remember to put it on before going into the sun. I think it's fair to assume suntan lotions won't work if you don't use them.

2. Put on an adequate amount to cover the skin. If you don't use an adequate amount it won't work as well as it should...this makes sense right?

3. Reapply it as needed. Sure, some lotions won't need to be reapplied and others will need to be reapplied every hour...but since it as "as needed" it can vary by product. It's safe to assume that you must reapply it if you need to, right?


Nothing the passage says about the application of suntan lotions is unreasonable to assume about all suntan lotions. it would be unreasonable if the passage said "and you must reapply it every 30 minutes" but everything they suggest is open to flexibility between brands.

D just doesn't make any sense any way you look at it. Even if you pretend it's correct.

C is the clear choice here.


Great explanation!
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Suntan Lotion [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2007, 08:47
Fistail wrote:
According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPF, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.

Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?

(A) It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.
(B) Because some people get sunburned more easily than others, the fact that there are different SPFs cannot be ignored.
(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.
(D) It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions require the same application.
(E) There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.


I got C.
For D, it is saying that the author assumes that all suntan lotions "require the same application" "same application" means, to me, is to protect against the sun. In C, "requirements for the application" is clearer.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2007, 07:17
eschn3am wrote:
OK, let's pretend the answer is D then.

Why is it unreasonable to assume suntan lotions have the same requirements for application?

1. You have to remember to put it on before going into the sun. I think it's fair to assume suntan lotions won't work if you don't use them.

2. Put on an adequate amount to cover the skin. If you don't use an adequate amount it won't work as well as it should...this makes sense right?

3. Reapply it as needed. Sure, some lotions won't need to be reapplied and others will need to be reapplied every hour...but since it as "as needed" it can vary by product. It's safe to assume that you must reapply it if you need to, right?


Nothing the passage says about the application of suntan lotions is unreasonable to assume about all suntan lotions. it would be unreasonable if the passage said "and you must reapply it every 30 minutes" but everything they suggest is open to flexibility between brands.

D just doesn't make any sense any way you look at it. Even if you pretend it's correct.

C is the clear choice here.


Well explained...C it is.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 216
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2007, 08:22
I go with C too.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Re: [#permalink] New post 21 Dec 2008, 03:33
eschn3am wrote:
OK, let's pretend the answer is D then.

Why is it unreasonable to assume suntan lotions have the same requirements for application?

1. You have to remember to put it on before going into the sun. I think it's fair to assume suntan lotions won't work if you don't use them.

2. Put on an adequate amount to cover the skin. If you don't use an adequate amount it won't work as well as it should...this makes sense right?

3. Reapply it as needed. Sure, some lotions won't need to be reapplied and others will need to be reapplied every hour...but since it as "as needed" it can vary by product. It's safe to assume that you must reapply it if you need to, right?


Nothing the passage says about the application of suntan lotions is unreasonable to assume about all suntan lotions. it would be unreasonable if the passage said "and you must reapply it every 30 minutes" but everything they suggest is open to flexibility between brands.

D just doesn't make any sense any way you look at it. Even if you pretend it's correct.

C is the clear choice here.


Fantastic approach. Agree
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1435
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Suntan Lotion [#permalink] New post 21 Dec 2008, 12:44
I got a straight C. Nothing else made sense.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Suntan Lotion [#permalink] New post 01 Jan 2009, 03:29
IMO C
Re: CR: Suntan Lotion   [#permalink] 01 Jan 2009, 03:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Advertisement: According to a recent research study, daily bholakc 43 02 Sep 2011, 05:46
Strengthen the advertisement eladshus 6 17 Jul 2011, 05:51
1 Advertising Pre777 8 29 Jun 2009, 13:15
6 CR - Advertisement Kiski 17 04 Feb 2009, 22:23
Advertisers MA 13 19 Apr 2005, 14:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion s

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.