Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Apr 2014, 19:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

According to futuristic writings in the 1960s, robots would

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1706
Followers: 391

Kudos [?]: 1562 [0], given: 25

GMAT Tests User
According to futuristic writings in the 1960s, robots would [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2012, 16:06
Expert's post
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

90% (01:58) correct 9% (01:20) wrong based on 72 sessions
According to futuristic writings in the 1960s, robots would soon drastically reduce crime. With night vision and ability to detect the chemicals involved in ballistics, such robots could be programed to paralyze anyone roaming the street at night with a gun: virtually all criminals fit that description. These criminals would be incapacitated and thus unable to resist an easy arrest.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that the logic of the prediction is flawed?
(A) Such robots would need to be charged during the daytime.
(B) Since policemen carry guns, the robots would incapacitate them just as efficiently as they incapacitate criminals
(C) Because these robots could pose a hazard to cars at night, special barriers would have to be constructed between the paths of the robots and the lanes of traffic.
(D) It's not obvious that reducing the number of criminals will always be beneficial.
(E) If the proposal plan were successful, it might ultimate result in a smaller and more efficient police force.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2011
Posts: 78
Location: Canada
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GMAT Date: 09-08-2012
GPA: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 2

Reviews Badge
Re: crime reducing robots [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2012, 19:12
+1 B

B. If we have robots roaming the streets at night paralyzing anyone with guns then police will also be paralyzed and criminals without guns will be able to roam free.
_________________

Thanks = +1 Kudos

Study from reliable sources!!

Thursdays with Ron: http://www.manhattangmat.com/thursdays-with-ron.cfm

Gmat Prep Questions:
CR gmatprepsc-105446.html
SC gmatprepsc-105446.html

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 565
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 75

Re: crime reducing robots [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2012, 20:34
+1 for (B)
Robots will start harming the gun-holding policemen,who are working for crime reduction too,because robots would not be figure out the difference between criminals and policemen/or anyone else for that matter.
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 30
Location: Venezuela
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 5

Re: crime reducing robots [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2012, 08:15
I usually break the arguments apart, seperating the premise from the conclusion.
Concerning the argument you posted i get:
Premise: With night vision and ability to detect the chemicals involved in ballistics, such robots could be programed to paralyze anyone roaming the street at night with a gun: virtually all criminals fit that description. These criminals would be incapacitated and thus unable to resist an easy arrest.
Conclusion: robots would soon drastically reduce crime

So, the only answer choice that could express a flaw in the prediction (the prediction being that "robots would soon drastically reduce crime") is answer choice A, because if the robots are charging at day time and are only effective at night time, then crime rates will consequently increase in day time, weakening the conclusion that "robots would soon drastically reduce crime".

I did not chose B because this answer choice is reffering to the premise of the argument instead of attacking the conclusion.

Nevertheless, I feel I am a bit confused. Could someone please clear this up for me.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 213
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 13

Re: crime reducing robots [#permalink] New post 05 Jul 2012, 06:52
tried to Weaken
Conclusion: These criminals would be incapacitated and thus unable to resist an easy arrest.
Premise1: robots could be programed to paralyze anyone roaming the street at night with a gun:virtually all criminals fit that description

(A) Such robots would need to be charged during the daytime.
--> out of scope (charging the robots has nothing to do with Arrests, also robots can work on alternal source of enery such as solar)

(B) Since policemen carry guns, the robots would incapacitate them just as efficiently as they incapacitate criminals
--> correct: should the flow as police also carry guns and robots will not differentiate between police and criminals, as the premise states that "anyone roaming the street at night with a gun"

(C) Because these robots could pose a hazard to cars at night, special barriers would have to be constructed between the paths of the robots and the lanes of traffic.
--> out of scope

(D) It's not obvious that reducing the number of criminals will always be beneficial.
--> out of scope

(E) If the proposal plan were successful, it might ultimate result in a smaller and more efficient police force.
--> this strengthen the conclusion
Re: crime reducing robots   [#permalink] 05 Jul 2012, 06:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts At the height of its popularity in the 1960s, the designer scorer 8 20 Mar 2005, 22:06
New posts Hippies, rebellious of the 1960's and 1970's, expressed enginpasa1 1 02 Feb 2008, 23:41
New posts In the 1960's paranoia was viewed by social scientists as tarek99 6 14 Mar 2008, 04:18
Popular new posts 2 Writing essays - Will or Would? rid82 18 11 Sep 2010, 21:39
New posts 14 Experts publish their posts in the topic According to the writings of Thorstein Veblen farhanc85 4 16 Aug 2013, 10:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

According to futuristic writings in the 1960s, robots would

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.