According to government official involved in overseeing : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 19:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# According to government official involved in overseeing

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

According to government official involved in overseeing [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2004, 12:14
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 5 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

18. According to government official involved in overseeing airplane safety during the last year, over 75 percent of the voice-recorder tapes taken from small airplanes involved in relatively minor accidents record the whistling of the pilot during the fifteen minutes immediately preceding the accident. Even such minor accidents pose some safety risk. Therefore, if passengers hear the pilot start to whistle they should take safety precautions, whether instructed by the pilot to do so or not.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

(A) accepts the reliability of the cited statistics on the authority of an unidentified government official

(B) ignores the fact that in nearly one quarter of these accidents following the recommendation would not have improved passenger' safety

(C) does not indicate the criteria by which an accident is classified as "relatively minor"

(D) provides no information about the percentage of all small airplane flights during which the pilot whistles at some time during that flight

(E) fails to specify the percentage of all small airplane flights that involve relatively minor accidents
If you have any questions
New!
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2004, 12:26
How do you justify your answer. It is impossible to findout when pilot wistles during the flight unless recording takesplace during the entire flight duration. I dont think it shows the flaw in the argument. The flaw apparent if it can be shown that accidents are caused by someother thing than wistling.
Are you thinking that if we one can show that pilots did wistle during some part of the flight journey and that didnt cause accidents then the flaw in the investigators reasoning becomes apparent?
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 240
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2004, 12:31
anandnk wrote:
How do you justify your answer. It is impossible to findout when pilot wistles during the flight unless recording takesplace during the entire flight duration. I dont think it shows the flaw in the argument. The flaw apparent if it can be shown that accidents are caused by someother thing than wistling.
Are you thinking that if we one can show that pilots did wistle during some part of the flight journey and that didnt cause accidents then the flaw in the investigators reasoning becomes apparent?

I did not consider the fact - how will one find out the percentage of time the pilots whistle. But, consider this -
If the pilots whistle in almost 100% of time in all the flights, how will the passengers distinguish between a risk and no risk situation ? See what I am trying to say...
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2004, 06:26
D is correct.

Unbelievable scenario. What would the passenegers do if pilots whistle on on average 30% of the time, or 60% of the time. It does not matter how often they whistle. Passengers will go for cover. I feel it is a stupid question. It is hard to judge for the passengers when to take cover no matter what the percentage is. So they will take the default action. It would good if the answer were rephrased as "passengers cannot decide when to take the cover whether or not it is kown how often the pilots whistle"
It is way far away from foraml logic question that talks about unbelievable scenario ( like life on mars for example ) and also way far away from reasonable plausible argument.
Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: According to government official involved in overseeing [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2016, 04:30
Answer D seems to be logical one.
Re: According to government official involved in overseeing   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2016, 04:30
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Government official: Currently many business travelers rely on a 1 17 Sep 2015, 04:05
19 Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as 5 25 Jan 2013, 23:08
1 Mayor Smith, one of our few government officials with a 15 28 Oct 2010, 18:26
Mayor Smith, one of our few government officials with a 3 21 Jul 2010, 05:01
4 Hutonian Government Official: Federal law requires truck 22 01 Oct 2008, 00:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by