Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Aug 2014, 14:43

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

According to government official involved in overseeing

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
According to government official involved in overseeing [#permalink] New post 07 Jan 2004, 12:14
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions
18. According to government official involved in overseeing airplane safety during the last year, over 75 percent of the voice-recorder tapes taken from small airplanes involved in relatively minor accidents record the whistling of the pilot during the fifteen minutes immediately preceding the accident. Even such minor accidents pose some safety risk. Therefore, if passengers hear the pilot start to whistle they should take safety precautions, whether instructed by the pilot to do so or not.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

(A) accepts the reliability of the cited statistics on the authority of an unidentified government official

(B) ignores the fact that in nearly one quarter of these accidents following the recommendation would not have improved passenger' safety

(C) does not indicate the criteria by which an accident is classified as "relatively minor"

(D) provides no information about the percentage of all small airplane flights during which the pilot whistles at some time during that flight

(E) fails to specify the percentage of all small airplane flights that involve relatively minor accidents
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 07 Jan 2004, 12:26
How do you justify your answer. It is impossible to findout when pilot wistles during the flight unless recording takesplace during the entire flight duration. I dont think it shows the flaw in the argument. The flaw apparent if it can be shown that accidents are caused by someother thing than wistling.
Are you thinking that if we one can show that pilots did wistle during some part of the flight journey and that didnt cause accidents then the flaw in the investigators reasoning becomes apparent?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 246
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 07 Jan 2004, 12:31
anandnk wrote:
How do you justify your answer. It is impossible to findout when pilot wistles during the flight unless recording takesplace during the entire flight duration. I dont think it shows the flaw in the argument. The flaw apparent if it can be shown that accidents are caused by someother thing than wistling.
Are you thinking that if we one can show that pilots did wistle during some part of the flight journey and that didnt cause accidents then the flaw in the investigators reasoning becomes apparent?


I did not consider the fact - how will one find out the percentage of time the pilots whistle. But, consider this -
If the pilots whistle in almost 100% of time in all the flights, how will the passengers distinguish between a risk and no risk situation ? See what I am trying to say...
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Jan 2004, 06:26
D is correct.

Unbelievable scenario. What would the passenegers do if pilots whistle on on average 30% of the time, or 60% of the time. It does not matter how often they whistle. Passengers will go for cover. I feel it is a stupid question. It is hard to judge for the passengers when to take cover no matter what the percentage is. So they will take the default action. It would good if the answer were rephrased as "passengers cannot decide when to take the cover whether or not it is kown how often the pilots whistle"
It is way far away from foraml logic question that talks about unbelievable scenario ( like life on mars for example ) and also way far away from reasonable plausible argument.
  [#permalink] 08 Jan 2004, 06:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Receiver of Wreck is an official of the British government getgyan 2 07 Oct 2012, 22:05
3 Hutonian Government Official: Federal law requires truck lexis 19 01 Oct 2008, 00:15
Although the governments expenditures on law suits involving Matador 4 12 Apr 2006, 14:59
Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as WinWinMBA 2 07 Jun 2005, 16:19
Government official: Clearly, censorship exists if we, as saurya_s 6 24 Feb 2005, 05:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

According to government official involved in overseeing

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.