Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 02:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Read the question below and mark your answer

You may select 1 option
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1298

Kudos [?]: 3662 [0], given: 185

Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2013, 17:17
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (02:29) correct 28% (01:41) wrong based on 124 sessions
Hello Everyone,

Here's a fresh question from e-GMAT. I hope you enjoy solving this. Looking forward to a great discussion as usual :)

Achievers’ Administrative Officer: At Achievers’ School, students from economically underprivileged backgrounds, who study free of charge under the company’s social responsibility clause, tend to spend less-time in school than the financially well-to-do, fee paying students. This is despite the fact that on average, economically underprivileged children have more pressing academic needs than the fee paying-students. Critics of the school have concluded that the economically underprivileged students are not receiving proper academic attention. However, this conclusion is almost certainly baseless. Careful investigation has recently shown two things: students from financially well to do households hang around in school premises to discuss their after-school parties, and tend to stay back in the school after classes to attend such optional sports activities that have nothing to do with a student’s academic development.

In the administrative officer’s argument, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first states the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
B. The first is used to support the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument; the second states that conclusion.
C. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by school critics; the second states the position that the administrative officer’s argument opposes.
D. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by school critics; the second provides support for the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument.
E. The first states the position that the administrative officer’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be


Last edited by egmat on 17 Oct 2013, 09:01, edited 2 times in total.
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 291

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2013, 18:33
I have put a lot of thought into the argument and have come up with D. What is the OA?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 95
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 32

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2013, 19:13
A. The first states the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.--- Incorrect, because the first statement is not the conclusion of the administrative officer but the conclusion of the critics. Also the second statement does not support the conclusion.
B. The first is used to support the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument; the second states that conclusion.---- The first statement is not supporting the conclusion but is the conclusion. The second statement is not a conclusion.
C. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by school critics; the second states the position that the administrative officer’s argument opposes.---- The second statement is not a position that the administrative officer opposes. This is opposite to what we need.
D. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by school critics; the second provides support for the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument.--- CORRECT.
D. The first states the position that the administrative officer’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument.--- The second statement is not the conclusion of the officer but he is just claiming that the critics conclusion is baseless.

IMO the First D out of the two D's. :wink:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 224
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 34

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 09:39
E,

Though i am not a fan of boldface question, here goes the explanation:

As per my understanding in boldface questions, you should focus more on the bold part only.

words such as certainly, definitely etc imply conclusion.

So E does fit well. the first part is a position that the officer opposes and the second part is the conclusion of the officer, what follows the conclusion is the reasoning.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 150
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 37

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 09:43
Premise:
* Economical underprivileged students(EUPS) perform worse(even though they need good performance) than Economical privileged students(EPS). Because EUPS do not stay back after school hours
* Critics conclusion : EUPS dont get academic attention
* Admin Officer : EPS stay back for activities which have nothing to do with course
Conclusion : Critics conclusion baseless

My Take E.
E. The first states the position that the administrative officer’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument.
_________________

Please give Kudos if you like the post

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 170
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 7

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 09:55
E has to be the answer ... first is what the admin officer opposes ... second is what admin officer want to conclude
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Location: India
GPA: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 10

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 11:37
Evidence used by Critics:At Achievers’ School, students from economically underprivileged backgrounds, who study free of charge under the company’s social responsibility clause, tend to spend less-time in school than the financially well-to-do, fee paying students. This is despite the fact that on average, economically underprivileged children have more pressing academic needs than the fee paying-students
Conclusion of Critics: the economically underprivileged students are not receiving proper academic attention (BF1)
Evidence used by Admin. officer: Careful investigation has recently shown two things: students from financially well to do households hang around in school premises to discuss their after-school parties, and tend to stay back in the school after classes to attend such optional sports activities that have nothing to do with a student’s academic development.

Conclusion of Admin. Officer: this conclusion is almost certainly baseless (BF-2)
Relation btw BF-1 and BF-2
BF-1 is the conclusion of Critics, whereas BF-2 is the conclusion of Admin. Off (the main conclusion of argument).
Here, BF-2 challenges BF-1.
A. The first states the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument (the first is the conclusion of Critics); the second provides support for that conclusion (the second challenges the first).
B. The first is used to support the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument (don’t support the Admin. Officer’s conclusion) ; the second states that conclusion.
C. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by school critics (the first is the conclusion itself); the second states the position that the administrative officer’s argument opposes (the second is the admin. Officer’s position).
D. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by school critics(the first is the conclusion itself); the second provides support for the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument (the second itself is the Admin. Officer conclusion).
E. The first states the position that the administrative officer’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the administrative officer’s argument. CORRECT
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 24

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 11:47
IMO E is the correct answer,
The second bold face is the main conclusion of the passage which refutes the conclusion of the critics.
A, B and C are easy to eliminate,
D is incorrect because the first is critics' conclusion not a support to it and the second is the administrative officer’s conclusion.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Posts: 111
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.81
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 12

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 12:32
OA most definitely should be E. Let me know if some1 needs detailed explanation or fresh perspective apart from the one's already given.
_________________

Citius, Altius, Fortius

Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2441
Followers: 310

Kudos [?]: 2604 [0], given: 696

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 13:57
Expert's post
Trying to figure out the gist of the argument

Grey part is what the critics say: the student are lazy, eventually

Red part what is stated by the critics: notice here the tone of the argument: in C and D the answer choices use "was used" but here we have a strong tone: it states something for sure

Blue part here the officer completely changes the argument with a strong shift as well. He states something else: Y instead of X (the critics) and support in a definitely way his reasons saying A and B

E must be the answer in this tough and well formulated question

regards
Attachments

screenshot.2.jpg
screenshot.2.jpg [ 218.09 KiB | Viewed 1267 times ]


_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS
Quant: 1. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 2. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 3. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version
Verbal:1. Best EXTERNAL resources to tackle the GMAT Verbal Section 2. e-GMAT's ALL CR topics-Consolidated 3. New Critical Reasoning question bank by carcass 4. Meaning/Clarity SC Question Bank by Carcass_Souvik 5. e-GMAT's ALL SC topics-Consolidated-2nd Edition 6. The best reading to improve Reading Comprehension 7.Verbal question bank and Directories

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2013
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 18

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 19:50
vabhs192003 wrote:
OA most definitely should be E. Let me know if some1 needs detailed explanation or fresh perspective apart from the one's already given.


For me also E is the best choice but my only concern is however is counter premise indicator. So, can it follow a conclusion?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 20:12
A: Critics of the school have concluded that the economically underprivileged students are not receiving proper academic attention - This is not the conclusion of the administrative officer but the critics - Incorrect
B: Critics of the school have concluded that the economically underprivileged students are not receiving proper academic attention - in no way support administrative officers comments as his position is exactly opposite - Incorrect
C: Critics of the school have concluded that the economically underprivileged students are not receiving proper academic attention - Therefore it a conclusion drawn by the critics and not a support / premise for the conclusion
D: Same as D - Incorrect
E: "Critics of the school have concluded that the economically underprivileged students are not receiving proper academic attention" - This is the conclusion / position given by the critics which the administrative officer opposes in the next statement. Therefore "E"
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2012
Posts: 16
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 660 Q45 V35
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 26

CAT Tests
Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2013, 07:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
atalwar wrote:
vabhs192003 wrote:
OA most definitely should be E. Let me know if some1 needs detailed explanation or fresh perspective apart from the one's already given.


For me also E is the best choice but my only concern is however is counter premise indicator. So, can it follow a conclusion?



E for me.

When arguments have multiple conclusions, then one conclusion can act as premise for the other conclusion.
In the same way, if I am not wrong, the sentence following However is acting as counter premise as well as second conclusion.
Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1298

Kudos [?]: 3662 [0], given: 185

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 17 Oct 2013, 09:02
Expert's post
Hello Everyone,

Thanks for an interesting discussion. I have added the official answer to the question. Let me know if anyone has any doubts.

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2013
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 18

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2013, 18:19
egmat wrote:
Hello Everyone,

Thanks for an interesting discussion. I have added the official answer to the question. Let me know if anyone has any doubts.

Thanks,
Chiranjeev


Hi,
I know E is the best choice but only doubt is that however is premise indicator so conclusion after however will work? KaranT for the same question replied :

'When arguments have multiple conclusions, then one conclusion can act as premise for the other conclusion.
In the same way, if I am not wrong, the sentence following However is acting as counter premise as well as second conclusion'

So is KaranT correct? Please, highlight this.
Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1794
Followers: 1298

Kudos [?]: 3662 [0], given: 185

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2013, 17:28
Expert's post
atalwar wrote:
egmat wrote:
Hello Everyone,

Thanks for an interesting discussion. I have added the official answer to the question. Let me know if anyone has any doubts.

Thanks,
Chiranjeev


Hi,
I know E is the best choice but only doubt is that however is premise indicator so conclusion after however will work? KaranT for the same question replied :

'When arguments have multiple conclusions, then one conclusion can act as premise for the other conclusion.
In the same way, if I am not wrong, the sentence following However is acting as counter premise as well as second conclusion'

So is KaranT correct? Please, highlight this.


Hi,

First of all, neither "however" is a premise indicator not it is compulsorily a counter-premise indicator.

Secondly, a statement cannot be the main conclusion and a counter-premise at the same time. Since the second BF is the main conclusion, it cannot be a counter-premise by definition.

A counter-premise is something which opposes the main conclusion. So, a statement cannot be counter-premise and main conclusion at the same time.

Now the most important thing regarding your question - you are saying that since a particular rule (however is a premise or counter premise indicator and is a part of BF2) doesn't apply to BF2, you cannot call it the main conclusion. This is inspite the fact that you feel that option E is correct and BF2 is the main conclusion.

So, here's one very important learning for you: Logic trumps every such rule. Logic is the most important thing. Given that we are dealing with English language, we cannot be certain that particular words can only be used in one way and not the other. So, even though, such rules may apply in majority of the cases, these rules are not universal. Therefore, if you feel that logic says something and the rule says something else, then always go by the logic.

Hope this helps :)

-Chiranjeev
_________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeT9_Wr0DlI&feature=youtu.be

Re: Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat   [#permalink] 19 Oct 2013, 17:28
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic A fresh 700 level bold face question egmat 8 15 Jan 2013, 21:42
2 CR: Bold Face Question jitu_ch 8 24 Jul 2006, 06:59
CR: Bold faced Questions wild_desperado 1 10 Jun 2005, 01:52
Bold Face Question anirban16 1 17 Mar 2005, 18:39
bold face questions bozo190101 0 18 Feb 2005, 01:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Achiever's school - a fresh bold face question from egmat

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.