Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Apr 2014, 21:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 78

GMAT Tests User
Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners from [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2012, 17:54
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

45% (02:24) correct 54% (01:56) wrong based on 68 sessions
Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners from the past 25 years is covered by the Acme retirement plan. Since the winners of the nation’s most prestigious award for economists have thus clearly recognized that the Acme plan offers them a financially secure future, it is probably a good plan for anyone with retirement needs similar to theirs.

The advertisement’s argumentation is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

(A) It ignores the possibility that the majority of Economic Merit Prize winners from previous years used a retirement plan other than the Acme plan.
(B) It fails to address adequately the possibility that any of several retirement plans would be good enough for, and offer a financially secure future to, Economic Merit Prize winners.
(C) It appeals to the fact that supposed experts have endorsed the argument’s main conclusion, rather than appealing to direct evidence for that conclusion.
(D) It takes for granted that some winners of the Economic Merit Prize have deliberately selected the Acme retirement plan, rather than having had it chosen for them by their employers.
(E) It presumes, without providing justification, that each of the Economic Merit Prize winners has retirement plan needs that are identical to the advertisement’s intended audience’s retirement plan needs.

Why is E) wrong?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 455
Location: United States (MA)
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 46

GMAT Tests User
Re: Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2012, 19:27
E is wrong because it contradicts information in given argument.

(E) It presumes, without providing justification, that each of the Economic Merit Prize winners has retirement plan needs that are identical to the advertisement’s intended audience’s retirement plan needs.

argument : it is probably a good plan for anyone with retirement needs similar to theirs.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Posts: 44
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 6

Re: Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2012, 23:11
voodoochild wrote:
Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners from the past 25 years is covered by the Acme retirement plan. Since the winners of the nation’s most prestigious award for economists have thus clearly recognized that the Acme plan offers them a financially secure future, it is probably a good plan for anyone with retirement needs similar to theirs.

The advertisement’s argumentation is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

(A) It ignores the possibility that the majority of Economic Merit Prize winners from previous years used a retirement plan other than the Acme plan.
(B) It fails to address adequately the possibility that any of several retirement plans would be good enough for, and offer a financially secure future to, Economic Merit Prize winners.
(C) It appeals to the fact that supposed experts have endorsed the argument’s main conclusion, rather than appealing to direct evidence for that conclusion.
(D) It takes for granted that some winners of the Economic Merit Prize have deliberately selected the Acme retirement plan, rather than having had it chosen for them by their employers.
(E) It presumes, without providing justification, that each of the Economic Merit Prize winners has retirement plan needs that are identical to the advertisement’s intended audience’s retirement plan needs.

Why is E) wrong?


Whenever there are questions that A causes B. or If A is true, then B is true.
Then the easy way to identify the incorrect choices that
If C is true, then B is true.
That means,
you should try to show that there is some other reason because of which they are secured with Acme Plan.
This is correctly depicted in Option D.
In Option D, it is trying to show that the economists did not choose the plan on their own but their employers. So the argument given by the advertiser falls.

In E, it is trying to attack the needs.

Assumption behind the argument is :
1) The best economists chose the plan on their own.
So our answer should be whichever option contradict this assumption.

In E, we are not attacking the assumption but the premise. The premise is always thought to be correct.

Hope this helps!!!!
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1697
Followers: 388

Kudos [?]: 1540 [1] , given: 25

GMAT Tests User
Re: Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2012, 14:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
voodoochild wrote:
Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners from the past 25 years is covered by the Acme retirement plan. Since the winners of the nation’s most prestigious award for economists have thus clearly recognized that the Acme plan offers them a financially secure future, it is probably a good plan for anyone with retirement needs similar to theirs.

The advertisement’s argumentation is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?
(A) It ignores the possibility that the majority of Economic Merit Prize winners from previous years used a retirement plan other than the Acme plan.
(B) It fails to address adequately the possibility that any of several retirement plans would be good enough for, and offer a financially secure future to, Economic Merit Prize winners.
(C) It appeals to the fact that supposed experts have endorsed the argument’s main conclusion, rather than appealing to direct evidence for that conclusion.
(D) It takes for granted that some winners of the Economic Merit Prize have deliberately selected the Acme retirement plan, rather than having had it chosen for them by their employers.
(E) It presumes, without providing justification, that each of the Economic Merit Prize winners has retirement plan needs that are identical to the advertisement’s intended audience’s retirement plan needs.

Why is E) wrong?

I am responding to a pm from Voodoochild.

First of all, as piyatiwari so eloquently pointed out --- if the argument specifies "a good plan for anyone with retirement needs similar to theirs", then they explicitly are considering the issue of differing retirement needs. In other words, they are not presuming anything along those lines.

Furthermore, beware of extreme language, which is always always always wrong on the GMAT. The phrase "similar retirement needs" -- that's balanced and sensible. The phrase "identical retirement needs" --- that's fanatically extreme. Consider any broad categories of people's lives --- their marriages, their relationship with children, their relationship with career, their relationship with religion, etc. etc. --- for any of these, we could reasonably say that the experience of this person and that person were "similar", but to say that two unrelated people had "identical" experience of marriage or family or something --- that's simply crazy. Right there, extreme = wrong.

Finally, in real world terms, there is something particularly bizarre and so completely unrealistic about the whole concept of "identical retirement needs" --- that is a phrase that, in and of itself, trumpets its own unabashed absurdity. Most people choosing a retirement account are decades away from actually retiring --- a typical person in her 30s has no idea what her needs will be by the time she is in her late 60s. If we look at two people of reasonably similar health and age, both in their 30s --- there's no way we could guarantee right now that their "retirement needs" three decades from now will be anywhere close to the same. No one can say what injuries, what diseases, what conditions, or what disabilities might occur. Some people, healthy all their lives, hit difficult health problems in their 50s, or in their 60s, or in their 70s, or much later, and it's very hard to tell, when a person is in his 30s, how all that will play out. The whole idea of two people, both in their 30s, having "identical retirement needs" --- pure fantasy, pure nonsense. It's true, if we are talking about customers in their 50s, they will have a somewhat better idea what to expect, but even in the 15 years between starting the plan and retiring, anything could happen. Folks might be on an ostensibly similar trajectory, but it is nothing short of folly to imagine that we could say two people have "identical" retirement needs. That's what leaps out at me when I read (E).

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Re: Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners   [#permalink] 09 Oct 2012, 14:11
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Nobel Prize in Economics kwam 5 15 Oct 2007, 06:07
Popular new posts Experts publish their posts in the topic Vote for Noble Prize in Economics for the year 2008!!! GMAT TIGER 13 08 Oct 2008, 09:14
New posts Experts publish their posts in the topic We're giving out cash prizes to MBA CHALLENGE winners ApplyintheSky 2 05 Jan 2011, 16:57
New posts prized as and prized for subhashghosh 0 19 Apr 2011, 07:36
New posts 1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Marie Curie, winner of two Nobel Prizes BeckyRobinsonTPR 2 30 Jul 2013, 05:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Advertisement: Each of the Economic Merit Prize winners from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.