Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Aug 2014, 03:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 417
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Followers: 38

Kudos [?]: 343 [0], given: 182

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink] New post 05 Feb 2013, 21:13
Choice (C). It strengthens the claim that the advertises have left the publication because they were morally disapproved, not primarily because decreased sales/revenue. -- This choice eliminates the other possibilities.
_________________

Thanks,
PraPon

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
Reading Comprehension notes: Click here
VOTE: vote-best-gmat-practice-tests-excluding-gmatprep-144859.html
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 18 Dec 2012
Posts: 22
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V27
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink] New post 05 Feb 2013, 23:26
"There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations"

Since we know they withdrew based on moral grounds: to strengthen the argument we just need to look for one they did on financial grounds. Leading to only (C) .
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2013, 12:18
I dont know why there is so much confusion.

This is a strengthen Question.
© Cos they morally disapproved publication of salacious material. We need to find something that will prove that it is because of moral principles against salacious material and not cos of other motives.
For example:- Changing publication because the readership of publication has changed will weaken. If the new readership is teenage girls , and advertisers don’t have teenage girls as their target audience, then they will obviously change. This is not cause of moral consideration.
How ever, if it is proven that staying with the publication is profitable, and the advertisers have changed despite that, then the argument will be strengthened }
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
-> Weakens due to the reasoning above.
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
-> What “some” other advertisers do is not a concern for us
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
-> Strengthen. Had the advertisers stayed, they could have made more money. But still decided to withdraw. A clear proof that this is because they are driven by moral values.
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
-> Neutral or Probably weakens. It restates that the readership has changed, An information that is already given in the passage. One could argue that since readership has changed, the advertisers withdrew as the new readers are not target audience. They did not change cos of morals.
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.
-> Same as D.


Hope it helps .

Rahul Ajith
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2012
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2013, 00:45
C is clear winner. The sales is expected to drop if advertisers withdrew ads in new publication even then they do so. This clearly shows some other motivation to withdrew ads such as moral obligations.
A is confusing but as the advertisers move to other family publications . It indicates that there are other reason to do so. May be the product doesn't suit new publication policy.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 348
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 12

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink] New post 17 Jun 2013, 17:22
A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.\\ May be their product was for family segment and not for the readers interested in sex and violence or may be they pulled out because of moral obligation. Also , this is mentioned in the passage.So we don't know. Out
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.// This is opposite of strenghthen,it weakens the passage.
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew. // This talks about the financial side of advertisers mind and it is not mentioned in the passage. hence this is the answer.
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence. // this is not talking about the advertisers. The argument is not concerned with what people feel. Hence out.
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.// this is mentioned in the passage, hence out
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous   [#permalink] 17 Jun 2013, 17:22
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous techyrajeev 4 14 Aug 2011, 11:31
1 Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous ardk 1 06 Jul 2011, 08:09
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous garimavyas 1 12 May 2011, 23:22
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous jyotsnasarabu 12 12 Nov 2006, 09:22
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous faifai0714 10 10 Oct 2006, 17:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.