Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 13 Jul 2014, 02:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 154
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 09:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people's tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.

(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.

(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.

(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.

(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.


Please give your explanation too.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 10:04
C is best because it gives evidence that even with a sales decrease, the advertiser will still withdraw from the publication, thus confirming that moral reasons were the cause of the withdrawal
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 10:17
I will go with A on this one.

A clearly says that the advertizers switched to other family news papers. All other choices give a hint that there was some other motiviation behind the switching of new papers.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 10:28
D brings in the possibility of reduction in number of people who see the advertisement, which is not beneficial to the advertisers.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 10:43
I see, C only says that they are NOT motivated by financial considerations but does not directly proves that moral considerations are the cause of the withdrawal of their ads from publications. On the other hand, A ascertains that they stuck to their moral values; advertise ONLY with family related publications or at least, with the ones which do not contain sex&violence content. Yes, A is best
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 295
Location: US
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 10:55
A.

If the advertisers switched to other family newspapers, it must be because the content had changed, and that they do not agree with the new focus (sex+violence) of the newspaper.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 154
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 11:55
Paul, I am not sure why you changed your answer.

C is the right answer. I am still not convinced why C is correct.

Maybe Paul can explain it better.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 13:36
This question is tricky. A can actually also be negated if I take another perspective at this problem. Let's say that the other family newspapers are profitable, then can we say that the reason why the advertisers switched to those other newpapers are based on moral values? In this case, A could or could not strengthen the argument depending on the profitability of the switch. I think C can be more directly infered according to my original explanation
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 13:55
Hmm

I was intending to choose C. But it was too obvious. I agree with Paul's explanation.

Anand.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 29 Mar 2004, 20:54
anandnk wrote:
Hmm

I was intending to choose C. But it was too obvious. I agree with Paul's explanation.

Anand.


I also agree with C. We must prove that moral obligation is present. Only C clearly presents it. The company is willing to lose money. Why?
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 928
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2006, 13:22
Paul,

What I did not understand in this passage how can you assume that the advertisers they are speaking of in answer choices are the same as the ones in the question posed?

Should not the answer choices say the advertisers that switched..

I went with A because of this reasoning..
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 950
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2006, 15:25
C looks to be the obvious choice to me. They withdrew their ads because of moral reasons...
_________________

I believe its yogurt!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2006, 08:38
I'll go with C.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2006, 18:14
Straight 'A' here...

The author justifies moral motivation to be one of the driving factors for the advertisers...

and the argument is they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material. Also some advertisers withdrew after the change is effected...

A - strengthens

B - weakens

C - is in subjunctive mood...forecast the sales based on the action taken. So out of context

D - a generic statement. out of context

E - irrelevant. an expectation on the appealing factor. But doesn't explain the change or the moral drive...
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 587
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - 1 [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2006, 18:48
aspire wrote:
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people's tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.

(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.

(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.

(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.

(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.


Please give your explanation too.


I agree with C.

A just says that the advertisers shifted to the family newspapers. This could be because the changed version of the magazine might appeal to a different class of consumers which these advertisers might not target. This does not give us an indication of their ethics and morals but of financial considerations. Its C which clearly states that despite the possibility of losing sales, the advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the mag , thus confirming their business ethics and morals.
Re: CR - 1   [#permalink] 13 Jun 2006, 18:48
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous ardk 1 06 Jul 2011, 08:09
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous garimavyas 1 12 May 2011, 23:22
1 Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous vineetgupta 24 04 Dec 2006, 11:43
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous jyotsnasarabu 12 12 Nov 2006, 09:22
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous faifai0714 10 10 Oct 2006, 17:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.