Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Mar 2015, 20:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 363
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 196 [4] , given: 50

Reviews Badge
Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2012, 02:36
4
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

31% (02:41) correct 69% (02:01) wrong based on 541 sessions
Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on beverage containers are necessary for environmental protection because they help to ensure that plastic and glass bottles as well as aluminum cans are recycled. This is, the advocates say, because the five-cent redemption programs provide a strong incentive to return the used containers to recycling facilities. However, a recent study found that states without a bottle deposit had more success in implementing comprehensive recycling programs, which include paper, plastics, and steel, in addition to the beverage containers, than did states with a bottle deposit law.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in analyzing the significance of the study referenced above?

A) Did any of the states surveyed lose revenue on the bottle deposit program?
B) Do the citizens of the states that were studied prefer five-cent redemption programs on beverage containers?
C) When the five-cent deposit programs were implemented, were the citizens of the states that began programs as enthusiastic about recycling as the citizens of the other states?
D) Did citizens of the states with and without bottle deposit programs purchase comparable numbers of beverages in plastic, glass and aluminum containers?
E) Where the bottle deposit and comprehensive recycling programs given equal funding?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html


Last edited by SOURH7WK on 18 Aug 2012, 10:14, edited 1 time in total.
Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2268
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 295

Kudos [?]: 2010 [0], given: 253

Premium Member
Re: Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2012, 04:37
Expert's post
Critical thinking implies any program need to be profitable for sustainable continuance. It is known world universally that recycling is one of the profitable strategies. It is not enthusiasm that will be the mainstay of any project. Let us take this case; the passage says that there are states without deposit law, but still continuing to recycle beverages, along with many others. One might enthusiastic to start with any schemes, but would not bother a while later, if they were to lose money consistently. So I would reckon that the deposit law countries were losing in spite of the incentives on cans, sand hence they are lagging behind other countries.

A) Did any of the states surveyed lose revenue on the bottle deposit program? --looks like it is the best choice -it is all in the money, you see
B) Do the citizens of the states that were studied prefer five-cent redemption programs on beverage containers? …. Preference is irrelevant here.
C) When the five-cent deposit programs were implemented, were the citizens of the states that began programs as enthusiastic about recycling
as the citizens of the other states? ---- Initial enthusiasm is not a valid reason for project's sustenance
D) Did citizens of the states with and without bottle deposit programs purchase comparable numbers of beverages in plastic, glass and aluminum containers? --- does not take into account the other comprehensive recycling programs
E) were the bottle deposit and comprehensive recycling programs given equal funding? ------ funding cane compared on such wide ranging factors. Funding can be compared only between bottle recycling vs. bottle recycling and not with steel, paper or plastics. Irrelevant comparison

_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 271
GMAT 1: 750 Q V
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 6

Re: Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2012, 07:34
Spelling and grammar mistakes in both stimulus and answer choices. What's the source of this question?
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 271
GMAT 1: 750 Q V
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 6

Re: Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2012, 07:53
Here's a link to the solution if you are interested.

http://www.beatthegmat.com/instructor-h ... 92121.html
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 271
GMAT 1: 750 Q V
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 59 [1] , given: 6

Re: Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2012, 07:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
Dear daagh et al,

This question was authored by a Veritas Instructor; according to him the answer is C. Personally, I like to attempt only validly certified critical reasoning questions from GMAC or the LSAC, because I think many CR questions authored by non-psychometricians lack a certain je ne sais quoi.

Anyway, if you are still interested in answering this question, here's the link to the author's explanation:
http://www.beatthegmat.com/instructor-h ... 92121.html

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3366
Followers: 378

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on [#permalink] New post 19 Jul 2014, 19:50
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Expert Post
MBA Section Director
User avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 2115
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 809

Kudos [?]: 4025 [0], given: 1229

Re: Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on [#permalink] New post 25 Nov 2014, 11:04
Expert's post
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2014
Posts: 99
Concentration: Marketing
GMAT 1: Q48 V25
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 66

Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on [#permalink] New post 25 Nov 2014, 11:29
Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on beverage containers are necessary for environmental protection because they help to ensure that plastic and glass bottles as well as aluminum cans are recycled. This is, the advocates say, because the five-cent redemption programs provide a strong incentive to return the used containers to recycling facilities. However, a recent study found that states without a bottle deposit had more success in implementing comprehensive recycling programs, which include paper, plastics, and steel, in addition to the beverage containers, than did states with a bottle deposit law.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in analyzing the significance of the study referenced above?

We require a question that will supply us an answer that will help us figure out why the states without a bottle deposit had more success in implementing comprehensive recycling programs.

A) Did any of the states surveyed lose revenue on the bottle deposit program?
Revenue is irrelevant to the implementation of the recycling programs.

B) Do the citizens of the states that were studied prefer five-cent redemption programs on beverage containers?
We only care about why the states that did have a bottle deposit were not recycling as much as the states without the bottle deposits.

C) When the five-cent deposit programs were implemented, were the citizens of the states that began programs as enthusiastic about recycling as the citizens of the other states?
States who are enthusiastic about recycling and don't have bottle deposits may recycle more than states who don't like to recycle but have a bottle deposit program.

D) Did citizens of the states with and without bottle deposit programs purchase comparable numbers of beverages in plastic, glass and aluminum containers?
The success isn't measured by the quantity of recyclables but by the rate of beverage containers that become recycled.

E) Where the bottle deposit and comprehensive recycling programs given equal funding?
Irrelevant comparison. The bottle deposit and comprehensive recycling programs are not the same and thus can not be compared.
Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on   [#permalink] 25 Nov 2014, 11:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits souvik101990 6 21 Nov 2014, 12:03
Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on beverage AmoyV 0 05 Sep 2014, 03:28
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on SOURH7WK 3 18 Aug 2012, 02:49
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic Consumer advocates argue that the coating found on non-stick GetThisDone 6 28 Apr 2012, 20:17
Deposits toiysam 0 31 Jan 2011, 13:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Advocates argue that five-cent bottle deposits charged on

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.