Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Aug 2016, 20:12
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

After the Second World War, the charter of the newly formed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1218
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 499 [0], given: 0

After the Second World War, the charter of the newly formed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2005, 17:26
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

46% (02:47) correct 54% (01:59) wrong based on 48 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

After the Second World War, the charter of the newly formed United Nations established an eleven-member Security Council and charged it with taking collective action in response to threats to world peace. The charter further provided that the five nations that were then the major powers would permanently have sole authority to cast vetoes. The reason given for this arrangement was that the burden of maintaining world peace would rest on the world’s major powers and should be required to assume the burden of enforcing a decision it found repugnant.

The reasoning given for the structure of the Security Council assumes that

(A) it does not make sense to provide for democracy among nations when nations themselves are not all democracies

(B) no nation that was not among the major powers at the end of the Second World War would become a major power

(C) nations would not eventually gravitate into large geographical blocs, each containing minor powers as well as at least one major power

(D) minor powers would not ally themselves with major powers to gain the protection of the veto exercised by major powers

(E) decisions reached by a majority of nations in response to threats to world peace would be biased in favor of one or more major powers
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 310 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2005, 18:28
1) After 2nd world war, charter of newly formed UN established 11 member security council
2) security council charged with taking collective actio in response to threats to world peace
3) charter further provides 5 major powers permanant sole authority to cast vetos
4) reason for this arrangement was that burden of maintainig world peace would rest on world's major powers
5) major powers should therefore be required to assume the burden of enforcing a decision it found repungant

The reasoning given for the structure of the Security Council assumes that

(A) it does not make sense to provide for democracy among nations when nations themselves are not all democracies
-out of scope

(B) no nation that was not among the major powers at the end of the Second World War would become a major power
- I'll go with this choice. The charter reasons that the burden of maintaining world peace should rest on the world's major powers. The arragement for the 5 major powers to have sole authority to cast veto suggests that the UN does not think any other nations will become major powers and none of the major powers will decline drastically in miliatry power.

(C) nations would not eventually gravitate into large geographical blocs, each containing minor powers as well as at least one major power
- not important

(D) minor powers would not ally themselves with major powers to gain the protection of the veto exercised by major powers
- does not matter

(E) decisions reached by a majority of nations in response to threats to world peace would be biased in favor of one or more major powers
- not important

I'll go with (B)
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1118
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2005, 20:54
I am lost with this one :-D
I choose E
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 863
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2005, 22:42
I feel like (B)

(A) it does not make sense to provide for democracy among nations when nations themselves are not all democracies
We are not arguing whether something makes sense.

(B) no nation that was not among the major powers at the end of the Second World War would become a major power
Negation: Some nation that was not among the major powers at the end of the Second World War would become a major power.
This will break the argument below.
The charter further provided that the five nations that were then the major powers would permanently have sole authority to cast vetoes. The reason given for this arrangement was that the burden of maintaining world peace would rest on the world’s major powers and should be required to assume the burden of enforcing a decision it found repugnant.


(C) nations would not eventually gravitate into large geographical blocs, each containing minor powers as well as at least one major power
Irrelevant. If it happens, there is still some major power nations.

(D) minor powers would not ally themselves with major powers to gain the protection of the veto exercised by major powers
Irrelevant. Major power nations are still making decisions and taking burdens.

(E) decisions reached by a majority of nations in response to threats to world peace would be biased in favor of one or more major powers
Have nothing to do with being biased.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1218
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 499 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Mar 2005, 00:02
Thanks

OA is B.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR040117 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2011, 12:20
I think the "permanant sole authority" is very important.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 87
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Schools: Thunderbird '15
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 8

Re: CR040117 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2011, 01:06
agree with B
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2014
Posts: 18
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 08-05-2014
GPA: 2.8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: After the Second World War, the charter of the newly formed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2014, 08:50
// The charter further provided that the five nations that were then the major powers would permanently have sole authority to cast vetoes.//

This is the hint, the nations that were then the major power would have this authority. The assumption was that other nations would not emerge as a major power.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9133
Followers: 797

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: After the Second World War, the charter of the newly formed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2016, 05:30
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: After the Second World War, the charter of the newly formed   [#permalink] 22 Aug 2016, 05:30
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in udaymathapati 8 14 Jun 2011, 03:19
During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in whichscore 5 30 Mar 2011, 10:23
During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in EnterMatrix 5 23 Jul 2010, 11:10
48-During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died perfectstranger 1 18 Jul 2008, 01:28
Shortly after the Persian Gulf War, investigators reported gmacvik 8 09 Sep 2006, 13:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

After the Second World War, the charter of the newly formed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.