Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Apr 2014, 06:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

After the Second World War unionism

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 485
Location: Bangalore,India
WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 94 [1] , given: 311

CAT Tests
After the Second World War unionism [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2013, 21:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese auto industry was company-based, with separate
unions in each auto company. Most company unions played no independent role in bargaining shop-floor
issues or pressing autoworkers' grievances. In a 1981 survey, for example, fewer than 1 percent of workers said they sought union assistance for work-related problems, while 43 percent said they turned to management instead. There was little to distinguish the two in any case: most union officers were foremen or middle-level managers, and the union's role was primarily one of passive support for company goals. Conflict occasionally disrupted this cooperative relationship—one company union's opposition to the productivity campaigns of the early 1980s has been cited as such a case. In 1986, however, a caucus led by the Foreman's Association forced the union's leadership out of office and returned the union's policy to one of passive cooperation. In the United States, the potential for such company unionism grew after 1979, but it had difficulty taking hold in the auto industry, where a single union represented workers from all companies, particularly since federal law prohibited foremen from joining or leading industrial unions.

The Japanese model was often invoked as one in which authority decentralized to the shop floor empowered production workers to make key decisions. What these claims failed to recognize was that the actual delegation of authority was to the foreman, not the workers. The foreman exercised discretion over job assignments, training, transfers, and promotions; worker initiative was limited to suggestions that fine-tuned a management-controlled production process. Rather than being proactive, Japanese workers were forced to be reactive, the range of their responsibilities being far wider than their span of control. For example, the founder of one production system, Taichi Ohno, routinely gave department managers only 90 percent of the resources needed for production. As soon as workers could meet production goals without working overtime, 10 percent of remaining resources would be removed. Because the "OH! NO!" system continually pushed the production process to the verge of breakdown in an effort to find the minimum resource requirement, critics described it as "management by stress."


1. The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) contrasting the role of unions in the Japanese auto industry with the role of unions in the United
States auto industry after the Second World War
(B) describing unionism and the situation of workers in the Japanese auto industry after the Second World War
(C) providing examples of grievances of Japanese auto workers against the auto industry after the Second World War
(D) correcting a misconception about the role of the foreman in the Japanese auto industry's union system after the Second World War
(E) reasserting the traditional view of the company's role in Japanese auto workers' unions after the Second World War
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA:B


2. According to the passage, a foreman in a United States auto company differed from a foreman in a Japanese auto company in that the foreman in the United States would
(A) not have been a member of an auto workers' union
(B) have been unlikely to support the goals of company management
(C) have been able to control production processes to a large extent
(D) have experienced greater stress
(E) have experienced less conflict with workers
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA:A


3. The author of the passage mentions the "OH! NO!" system primarily in order to
(A) indicate a way in which the United States industry has become more like the Japanese auto industry
(B) challenge a particular misconception about worker empowerment in the Japanese auto industry
(C) illustrate the kinds of problem-solving techniques encouraged by company unions in Japan
(D) suggest an effective way of minimizing production costs in auto manufacturing
(E) provide an example of the responsibilities assumed by a foreman in the Japanese auto industry
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA:B


4. It can be inferred that the author of the passage sees which of the following as the primary advantage to companies in implementing the "OH! NO!" system?
(A) It permitted the foreman to take initiative.
(B) It minimized the effort required to produce automobiles.
(C) It ensured that production costs would be as low as possible.
(D) It allowed the foreman to control the production process.
(E) It required considerable worker empowerment to achieve managers' goals.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA:C


_________________

One Final Try.......

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 485
Location: Bangalore,India
WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 311

CAT Tests
Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2013, 21:48
HI,

Can some one explain 2 & 3 answers please.
_________________

One Final Try.......

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the 2nd attempt
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 115
Location: India
GRE 1: 1110 Q700 V410
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2013, 22:39
RaviChandra wrote:
HI,

Can some one explain 2 & 3 answers please.


Hi Both are inference questions, As far i read the passage.

Question 2 : According to the passage, a foreman in a United States auto company differed from a foreman in a Japanese auto company in that the foreman in the United States would?

Quote:
US federal law prohibited US foremen from joining or leading industrial unions.
this what we can infer from the last line of 1st para.


I chose A after POE.

For

Question 3 : The author of the passage mentions the "OH! NO!" system primarily in order to

Quote:
The 2nd para says that though Japanese unions empowered production workers to take key decision. The actual authority was with the foremen only..
The author then gives the example.

After doing the POE, I was left with B.

A: Not relevant.
B: sounds good-hold
C: WE cannot infer this.
D: The critics says this as a stress- reject.
E: The foreman exercised discretion over job assignments, training, transfers, and promotions(stated in the passage)- eliminated.


Hope it helps :)
_________________

With ordinary talent and extraordinary perseverance all things are attainable- Thomas Foxwell Buxton

Providing Kudos is the best way to thank :)



Improving from V30 to V40 | Improving from Q35-40 to Q47 | Consolidation of MATH topics

100 hard CR | 100 hard SC | 100 Hard PS | 100 Hard DS |Seven Samurai- Collection best DS probs | 700+ Pledge

Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 29
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.28
WE: Analyst (Investment Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 83

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2013, 08:06
RaviChandra wrote:
HI,

Can some one explain 2 & 3 answers please.

Q2: As above :-D
Q3:
"Rather than being proactive, Japanese workers were forced to be reactive, the range of their responsibilities being far wider than their span of control.
For example, blah blah blah "

Therefore, the author introduced the "OH-NO" system in order to resolve the misconception about the Japanese workers characteristics.
Re: After the Second World War unionism   [#permalink] 11 Oct 2013, 08:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts After the Second World War, the charter of the newly formed chunjuwu 6 20 Mar 2005, 16:26
New posts More than fifty years after the Second World War, a number freshlily 4 13 May 2006, 17:46
Popular new posts More than fifty years after the Second World War, a number scgmat 15 24 Jul 2006, 20:23
New posts 1 After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese auto massi2884 0 19 May 2012, 06:18
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese RaviChandra 1 25 Sep 2013, 18:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

After the Second World War unionism

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.