Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Sep 2014, 20:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 485
Location: Bangalore,India
WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 335

After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese [#permalink] New post 25 Sep 2013, 18:19
After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese auto industry was company-based, with separate
unions in each auto company. Most company unions played no independent role in bargaining shop-floor
issues or pressing autoworkers' grievances. In a 1981 survey, for example, fewer than 1 percent of workers said they sought union assistance for work-related problems, while 43 percent said they turned to management instead. There was little to distinguish the two in any case: most union officers were foremen or middle-level managers, and the union's role was primarily one of passive support for company goals. Conflict occasionally disrupted this cooperative relationship—one company union's opposition to the productivity campaigns of the early 1980s has been cited as such a case. In 1986, however, a caucus led by the Foreman's Association forced the union's leadership out of office and returned the union's policy to one of passive cooperation. In the United States, the potential for such company unionism grew after 1979, but it had difficulty taking hold in the auto industry, where a single union represented workers from all companies, particularly since federal law prohibited foremen from joining or leading industrial unions.

The Japanese model was often invoked as one in which authority decentralized to the shop floor empowered production workers to make key decisions. What these claims failed to recognize was that the actual delegation of authority was to the foreman, not the workers. The foreman exercised discretion over job assignments, training, transfers, and promotions; worker initiative was limited to suggestions that finetuned a management-controlled production process. Rather than being proactive, Japanese workers were forced to be reactive, the range of their responsibilities being far wider than their span of control. For example, the founder of one production system, Taichi Ohno, routinely gave department managers only 90 percent of the resources needed for production. As soon as workers could meet production goals without working overtime, 10 percent of remaining resources would be removed. Because the "OH! NO!" system continually pushed the production process to the verge of breakdown in an effort to find the minimum resource requirement, critics described it as "management by stress."



1. According to the passage, a foreman in a United States auto company differed from a foreman in a Japanese auto company in that the foreman in the
United States would
(A) not have been a member of an auto workers' union
(B) have been unlikely to support the goals of company management
(C) have been able to control production processes to a large extent
(D) have experienced greater stress
(E) have experienced less conflict with workers

2. The author of the passage mentions the "OH! NO!" system primarily in order to

(A) indicate a way in which the United States industry has become more like the Japanese auto industry
(B) challenge a particular misconception about worker empowerment in the Japanese auto industry
(C) illustrate the kinds of problem-solving techniques encouraged by company unions in Japan
(D) suggest an effective way of minimizing production costs in auto manufacturing
(E) provide an example of the responsibilities assumed by a foreman in the Japanese auto industry


OA will be provided later. please explain you answer options.
_________________

One Final Try.......

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 150
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 37

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2013, 00:55
1. According to the passage, a foreman in a United States auto company differed from a foreman in a Japanese auto company in that the foreman in the
United States would
(A) not have been a member of an auto workers' union --- Correct. As mentioned in the last line on 1st paragraph.
(B) have been unlikely to support the goals of company management --- Out of scope
(C) have been able to control production processes to a large extent --- Out of scope
(D) have experienced greater stress --- Out of scope
(E) have experienced less conflict with workers --- Out of scope

2. The author of the passage mentions the "OH! NO!" system primarily in order to

(A) indicate a way in which the United States industry has become more like the Japanese auto industry -- Out of scope. No mention
(B) challenge a particular misconception about worker empowerment in the Japanese auto industry -- Not a challenge
(C) illustrate the kinds of problem-solving techniques encouraged by company unions in Japan -- It wasn't a problem solving technique and also passage does not mention that it was encouraged by company Union
(D) suggest an effective way of minimizing production costs in auto manufacturing -- No mention whether it was effective
(E) provide an example of the responsibilities assumed by a foreman in the Japanese auto industry --Correct. Passage mentions "the range of their responsibilities being far wider than their span of control."
_________________

Please give Kudos if you like the post

Re: After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese   [#permalink] 26 Sep 2013, 00:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 GMATPREP ChallengeQ -After the Second World War, unionism in PiyushK 3 12 Aug 2014, 08:55
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic After the Second World War unionism RaviChandra 3 29 Sep 2013, 21:39
1 After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese auto massi2884 0 19 May 2012, 06:18
More than fifty years after the Second World War, a number freshlily 4 13 May 2006, 17:46
After the Second World War, the charter of the newly formed chunjuwu 7 20 Mar 2005, 16:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.