Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: GmatPrep. 32.DS [#permalink]
08 Jun 2008, 00:17

I will go for E (1) gives information about Al and PAblo but no relation for Marsha Insufficient (2) tells abt Marsho but agin no info abt Al and Pablo togetehr also no clue So E is the best option

There is no further information given about d or t. Unlike other problems where it is possible to plug in other formulas to cancel out variables, plugging in formulas in here will simply lead to the introduction of new variables. INSUFFICIENT

Re: Al, Pablo, and Marsha shared the driving on a 1,500-mile [#permalink]
01 Aug 2013, 15:27

1

This post received KUDOS

WholeLottaLove wrote:

Marsha drove 450 miles meaning Al and Pablo drove a combined950but we still don't know who drove the most.

Its these kind of mistakes which may cause to be the difference between a 750 and an average score _________________

You've been walking the ocean's edge, holding up your robes to keep them dry. You must dive naked under, and deeper under, a thousand times deeper! - Rumi

Re: Al, Pablo, and Marsha shared the driving on a 1,500-mile [#permalink]
01 May 2014, 07:04

1

This post received KUDOS

sondenso wrote:

Al, Pablo, and Marsha shared the driving on a 1,500-mile trip. Which of the three drove the greatest distance on the trip?

(1) Al drove 1 hour longer than Pablo but at an average rate of 5 miles per hour slower than Pablo.

(2) Marsha drove 9 hours and averaged 50 miles per hour.

Going by process of Elimination

Lets take (2) --> It only indicates that Marsha drove 450 km so the remaining distance of 1500 - 450 could be distributed anyway between Al and Pablo. Clearly not sufficient

Taking (1) Let speeds of Pablo = p , time = t. Alone it is clearly insufficient as there are 2 variables and one equation so multiple solutions possible. Pooling up with (2) , 1050 = p*t + (p -5)*(t+1)

Since this has two variables and only equation , it can infinite results so Not sufficient.

Re: Al, Pablo, and Marsha shared the driving on a 1,500-mile [#permalink]
01 May 2014, 08:37

2

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

himanshujovi wrote:

sondenso wrote:

Al, Pablo, and Marsha shared the driving on a 1,500-mile trip. Which of the three drove the greatest distance on the trip?

(1) Al drove 1 hour longer than Pablo but at an average rate of 5 miles per hour slower than Pablo.

(2) Marsha drove 9 hours and averaged 50 miles per hour.

Going by process of Elimination

Lets take (2) --> It only indicates that Marsha drove 450 km so the remaining distance of 1500 - 450 could be distributed anyway between Al and Pablo. Clearly not sufficient

Taking (1) Let speeds of Pablo = p , time = t. Alone it is clearly insufficient as there are 2 variables and one equation so multiple solutions possible. Pooling up with (2) , 1050 = p*t + (p -5)*(t+1)

Since this has two variables and only equation , it can infinite results so Not sufficient.

Bunuel - is my thought process correct ?

Yes, it is.

Though notice that there are certain cases when you CAN solve one equations with two variables. For example, in cases of Diophantine equations (equations whose solutions must be integers only):

Social entrepreneurs aren't running charities : ‘It’s easy to think about it in terms of charity: it’s not. They are sustainable, trading, revenue-generating businesses. The benefit of them...