Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 00:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Alba: I don t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Location: USA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Alba: I don t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 11:37
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Alba: I don’t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next election. She is not a strong supporter of the war against crime.
Tam: But Senator Frank sponsored the latest anticrime law passed by the Senate.
Alba: If Senator Frank sponsored it, it can’t be a very strong anticrime law.

Which of the following identifies the most serious logical flaw in Alba’s reasoning?

(A) The facts she presents do not support her conclusion that Senator Frank is soft on crime.
(B) She assumes without proof that crime is the most important issue in the upcoming election.
(C) She argues in a circle, using an unsupported assertion to dismiss conflicting evidence.
(D) She attacks Senator Frank on personal grounds rather than on he merit as a political leader.
(E) In deciding not to vote for Senator Frank, she fails to consider issues other than crime.

Please provide an explanation on how you get to your answer.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 69
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 11:42
I will go with C.

This is an example of circular reasoning.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Voting [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 11:47
IMO C, she claims that senator is soft on crime and when a fact is presented against it, she dismisses it using her own claim...

(A) The facts she presents do not support her conclusion that Senator Frank is soft on crime.
(Rejected, she does not present any fact)
(B) She assumes without proof that crime is the most important issue in the upcoming election.
(out of scope)
(C) She argues in a circle, using an unsupported assertion to dismiss conflicting evidence.
(looks reasonable)
(D) She attacks Senator Frank on personal grounds rather than on he merit as a political leader.
(out of scope)
(E) In deciding not to vote for Senator Frank, she fails to consider issues other than crime.
(out of scope)
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 167
Location: Atlanta , GA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 13:19
"E" looks fine to me
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 27
Location: Pattikadu
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 15:13
C for me
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 257
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 16:02
C is right. Couldn't have said it better ranga41

Last edited by popew626 on 31 Aug 2005, 18:16, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2005, 16:23
C.

GA
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2005, 08:25
I'll take C on this C. The unsupported assertion was 'it must a soft anticrime law' and this was made to defend a conflict in her arguments pointed out by Tam.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2005, 08:53
As explained got C.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 207
Location: Ghana
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2005, 09:01
IMO clearly C.
B, D and E are out. And A is wrong because Alba doesn't present any facts.
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2005, 11:10
I would go with C
_________________

Thanks!

  [#permalink] 01 Sep 2005, 11:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Alba: I don t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next seekmba 6 03 Mar 2010, 11:16
Alba: I don t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next vw01 8 13 Apr 2006, 14:42
Alba: I don t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next ps_dahiya 8 26 Jan 2006, 02:01
Alba: I don t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next vivek123 10 28 Nov 2005, 06:21
Alba: I don t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next ninomoi 5 16 Nov 2004, 16:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Alba: I don t intend to vote for Senator Frank in the next

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.