All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 11:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2004, 08:55
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

22. All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very nearsighted. So I must be a genius.

Which one of the following exhibits both of the logical flaws exhibited in the argument above?

(A) I must be stupid because all intelligent people are nearsighted and I have perfect eyesight.

(B) All chickens have beaks. This bird has a beak. So this bird must be a chicken.

(C) All pigs have four legs, but this spider has eight legs. So this spider must be twice as big as any pig.

(D) John is extremely happy, so he must be extremely tall because all tall people are happy.

(E) All geniuses are very nearsighted. I must be very nearsighted since I am a genius.

Please explain. How to get high accuracy in these parallel structure problems ?
If you have any questions
New!
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 358 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2004, 09:15
Tough one, I must say. My metod is to look closely at the stimulus.

It mentions:
all intelligent people are nearsighted
I am very near sighted
So I must be a genius

What is is doing here is 'equating' intelligent people = nearsighted, so the extremely intellligent people (geniuses) = very nearsighted

Now let's go and find something similar in the choices.

(A) Intelligent people = Nearsighted
I must be stupid = perfect eyesight
Might not be good enough, stupid can be farsighted as well.

(B) Chicken = Beaks
Bird has a beak, so bird must be a chicken
No comparison of extremes here. So reject this.

(C) Pigs = 4 legs
Spider = 8 legs
So spider must be bigger. Again, no comparison of extremes.

(D) Tall people = Happy
John = Extremely happy because he is extremely tall
This choice gives us the comparison of extremes exhibited in the stimulus

(E) Geniuses = Very nearsighted
I = genius because I am very nearsighted.
Also no comparison, basically uses the logic given.
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 273
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2004, 09:53
The flaw is incorrectly reversing the implication, and then applying extremes to the reversal.

A -> B becomes very B -> very A.

Tall -> Happy

John extremely happy so John is extremely tall follows the same flaw.

D.
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2004, 06:53
Great explanation.

19 Aug 2004, 06:53
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very 6 26 Feb 2010, 10:57
2 All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very 12 18 Nov 2009, 10:24
All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very 4 25 Jun 2009, 03:15
2 All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very 6 08 Sep 2007, 19:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by