Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 02:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2012
Posts: 339
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.88
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 76 [1] , given: 31

All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2012, 20:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

67% (04:42) correct 33% (00:00) wrong based on 16 sessions
All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's theory and Professor Heissmann's. However, the prediction that these theories make about the result of the planned experiment cannot both be true. Therefore, the result of this experiment will confurm one of these theories at the expense of the other.

The argument above exhibits an erroneous pattern of reasoning most similar to that exhibited by which one of the following?

(A) David and Jane both think they know how to distinguish beech trees from elms, but when they look at trees together they often disagree. Therefore, at leat one of the must have an erroneous method.

(B) Although David thinks the tree they saw was a beech, Jane thinks it was an elm. jane's description of the tree's freatures is consistant with her opinion, so this description must be inconsistent with David's view.

(C) David and Jane have been equally good at identifying trees so far. But David says this one is an elm, whereas jane is unsure. Therefore, if this tree turns out to be an elm, we'll know David is better.

(D) David thinks that there are more beeches that elms int he forest. Jane thinks he is wrong. The section of forest we examined was small, but examination of the whole forest would either confirm David's view or disprove it.

(E) David thinks this tree is a beech. Jane thinks it is an elm. Maria, unlike David or Jane, is expert at tree identification, so when Maria gives her opinon it will verify either David's or Jane's opinion.

OA, After some time..
_________________

"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you’ll be successful.” - Eric Thomas

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1227
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 693 [0], given: 116

Premium Member
Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's.. [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2012, 22:13
Tough one.. IMHO answer is D... Will explain if correct.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Edge of Extinction
Joined: 09 Sep 2012
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [2] , given: 29

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's.. [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2012, 23:30
2
This post received
KUDOS
Evidence--fit-->Theory. Prediction--future event-->both outcomes !true.
Conclusion: result confirms one at expense of other.

Red highlight is where the reasoning errors are. There are two reasoning errors in a small phrase here - that there is no other possibility other than two outcomes and that one possible outcome must be at the expense of the other.

(A) David and Jane both think they know how to distinguish beech trees from elms, but when they look at trees together they often disagree. Therefore, at least one of the must have an erroneous method. There is a causality of one outcome disproving another possible outcome, rather than a problem with the method. Incorrect.

(B) Although David thinks the tree they saw was a beech, Jane thinks it was an elm. jane's description of the tree's freatures is consistant with her opinion, so this description must be inconsistent with David's view. There must be an inconsistency between results (not description, which is subjective) such that the (objective) result disproves the other possible result. Incorrect.

(C) David and Jane have been equally good at identifying trees so far. But David says this one is an elm, whereas jane is unsure. Therefore, if this tree turns out to be an elm, we'll know David is better. David is better attaches a quality to the person. Not related to an objective outcome. Incorrect.

(D) David thinks that there are more beeches that elms int he forest. Jane thinks he is wrong. The section of forest we examined was small, but examination of the whole forest would either confirm David's view or disprove it. This actually is the opposite of what the question is asking and contains no reasoning error. Incorrect.

(E) David thinks this tree is a beech. Jane thinks it is an elm. Maria, unlike David or Jane, is expert at tree identification, so when Maria gives her opinon it will verify either David's or Jane's opinion. Maria's opinion will validate either David's or Jane's, i.e. one outcome would come at the expense of other. Objective result. Both reasoning errors present (both can't be wrong and one must come at the expense of other). Correct.

Parallel reasoning hard questions cook my goat. I appreciate the question. Thanks. :)
_________________

The only ability the GMAT is an indicator of...is the ability to do well on the GMAT.

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 225
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GMAT 2: 0 Q0 V0
GPA: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [1] , given: 44

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's.. [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2012, 23:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
vomhorizon wrote:
All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's theory and Professor Heissmann's. However, the prediction that these theories make about the result of the planned experiment cannot both be true. Therefore, the result of this experiment will confurm one of these theories at the expense of the other.

The argument above exhibits an erroneous pattern of reasoning most similar to that exhibited by which one of the following?

(A) David and Jane both think they know how to distinguish beech trees from elms, but when they look at trees together they often disagree. Therefore, at leat one of the must have an erroneous method.

(B) Although David thinks the tree they saw was a beech, Jane thinks it was an elm. jane's description of the tree's freatures is consistant with her opinion, so this description must be inconsistent with David's view.

(C) David and Jane have been equally good at identifying trees so far. But David says this one is an elm, whereas jane is unsure. Therefore, if this tree turns out to be an elm, we'll know David is better.

(D) David thinks that there are more beeches that elms int he forest. Jane thinks he is wrong. The section of forest we examined was small, but examination of the whole forest would either confirm David's view or disprove it.

(E) David thinks this tree is a beech. Jane thinks it is an elm. Maria, unlike David or Jane, is expert at tree identification, so when Maria gives her opinon it will verify either David's or Jane's opinion.

OA, After some time..



Oh it was really tough for me...

IMO A... :(
_________________

GMAT - Practice, Patience, Persistence
Kudos if u like :)

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2012
Posts: 95
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
WE: Other (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [1] , given: 35

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's.. [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2012, 23:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
vomhorizon wrote:
All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's theory and Professor Heissmann's. However, the prediction that these theories make about the result of the planned experiment cannot both be true. Therefore, the result of this experiment will confurm one of these theories at the expense of the other.

The argument above exhibits an erroneous pattern of reasoning most similar to that exhibited by which one of the following?

(A) David and Jane both think they know how to distinguish beech trees from elms, but when they look at trees together they often disagree. Therefore, at leat one of the must have an erroneous method.

(B) Although David thinks the tree they saw was a beech, Jane thinks it was an elm. jane's description of the tree's freatures is consistant with her opinion, so this description must be inconsistent with David's view.

(C) David and Jane have been equally good at identifying trees so far. But David says this one is an elm, whereas jane is unsure. Therefore, if this tree turns out to be an elm, we'll know David is better.

(D) David thinks that there are more beeches that elms int he forest. Jane thinks he is wrong. The section of forest we examined was small, but examination of the whole forest would either confirm David's view or disprove it.

(E) David thinks this tree is a beech. Jane thinks it is an elm. Maria, unlike David or Jane, is expert at tree identification, so when Maria gives her opinon it will verify either David's or Jane's opinion.

OA, After some time..

IMO E.. I agree with Zenverse's explanation.
_________________

TH

Give me +1 Kudos if my post helped!

"Follow your passion. Change the world."

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 3
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Human Resources
GMAT 1: Q V0
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 6

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's.. [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2012, 01:05
I must say a real good Question ..

All my understanding leads to E ( hope the understanding is correct )

I will go with E.... :roll:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 299
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 32

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's.. [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2012, 03:58
Zenverse's explanation is perfect.

Cheers
Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's..   [#permalink] 28 Nov 2012, 03:58
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
my story so far... pittgreek 1 04 Dec 2009, 18:04
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's mikeCoolBoy 12 03 Sep 2009, 22:03
Number of offers so far! agsfaltex 8 15 Feb 2007, 15:28
My Ordeal so far.... faisalt 1 15 Nov 2005, 19:22
My progress so far.. itpragmatik 7 28 Oct 2005, 10:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.