Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Apr 2014, 14:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Although beavers can still be found throughout the western

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2010
Posts: 141
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GMAT 1: 590 Q28 V38
GPA: 2.54
WE: Accounting (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 12

GMAT ToolKit User
Although beavers can still be found throughout the western [#permalink] New post 03 May 2012, 15:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (low)

Question Stats:

69% (01:42) correct 30% (00:45) wrong based on 259 sessions
Although beavers can still be found throughout the western United States, their number has declined compared with the eighteenth century, when the abundance of beaver lured armies of European trappers into the Rocky Mountains region to slaughter them for their pelts.

A)their number has declined compared with
B)their numbers have declined compared with
C)their numbers have declined since
D) their numbers have declined in comparison to those of
E)the number of them declined since

Do not understand their justification behind their comparison logic.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

4/28 GMATPrep 42Q 36V 640

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 455
Location: United States (MA)
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 46

GMAT Tests User
Re: Although beavers can still be found [#permalink] New post 03 May 2012, 16:03
A)their number has declined compared with - wrong comparison
B)their numbers have declined compared with - wrong comparison
C)their numbers have declined since - Correct
D) their numbers have declined in comparison to those of - Grammatically right, but wordy
E)the number of them declined since - number of (means many) beavers decline?? wrong.

'Beavers number' can not be compared with '18th century'. So A and B are out.

FYI

To compare to is to point out or imply resemblances between objects regarded as essentially of a different order;
To compare with is mainly to point out differences between objects regarded as essentially of the same order.
3 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1577
Followers: 1064

Kudos [?]: 2541 [3] , given: 164

GMAT Tests User
Re: Although beavers can still be found [#permalink] New post 09 May 2012, 05:57
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi All,

Although beavers can still be found throughout the western United States, their number has declined compared with the eighteenth century, when the abundance of beaver lured armies of European trappers into the Rocky Mountains region to slaughter them for their pelts.

Image

Error Analysis:
1. The sentence presents illogical comparison. The number of beavers has been compared to the eighteenth century.

POE:

Choice A: their number has declined compared with: Incorrect for the reason stated above.

Choice B: their numbers have declined compared with: Incorrect as this choice repeats the same error of Choice A.

Choice C: their numbers have declined since: Correct. Use of “since” clearly conveys the intended meaning of the sentence.

Choice D: their numbers have declined in comparison to those of: Incorrect. “those of” stands for “numbers of”. This again leads to an illogical comparison.

Choice E: the number of them declined since: Incorrect. “the number of them” is not same as “their number”. This choice seems to suggest that beavers had some kind of number that started to decline.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________

Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions)
Free Session: September 14: Learn how to define your GMAT strategy, create your study plan and master the core skills to excel on the GMAT. Click here to attend.
ImageImageImageImage

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 65
Location: Korea, Republic of
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 08-16-2012
GPA: 3.05
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 36

GMAT Tests User
Re: Although beavers can still be found [#permalink] New post 09 May 2012, 23:02
Although beavers can still be found throughout the western United States, their number has declined compared with the eighteenth century, when the abundance of beaver lured armies of European trappers into the Rocky Mountains region to slaughter them for their pelts.

A)their number has declined compared with 'their number' doesn't sound right
B)their numbers have declined compared with wrong comparison
C)their numbers have declined since concise
D) their numbers have declined in comparison to those of wordy
E)the number of them declined since distorts meaning
_________________

Luck is the additional surplus on the way to one's constant effort.

Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GPA: 3.22
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Although beavers can still be found [#permalink] New post 09 May 2012, 23:32
Although beavers can still be found throughout the western United States, their number has declined compared with the eighteenth century, when the abundance of beaver lured armies of European trappers into the Rocky Mountains region to slaughter them for their pelts.

A)their number has declined compared with
B)their numbers have declined compared with
C)their numbers have declined since
D) their numbers have declined in comparison to those of
E)the number of them declined since

A & B - Wrong comparison ('number' compared with 18th century - illogical)
C - Grammatically correct
D - 'in comparison to' is used when we are comparing two unlike things, but here from the
context we can infer that comparison is between numbers.
E - no present perfect used. (have declined since - correct)

But one question:
What if we use 'with' in D, does it make sense?

their numbers have declined in comparison with those of
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 5
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Reviews Badge
Re: Although beavers can still be found [#permalink] New post 19 May 2012, 07:49
I narrowed it down to C & D, but chose D ...
"C)their numbers have declined since" ... I thought a sentence with "since" should have "have been" so in the case I was expecting "have been declining"
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 117
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 17

Re: Although beavers can still be found [#permalink] New post 05 Aug 2012, 05:02
Hi Sharddha,

Why do you says that numbers of illogical in option D...what is wrong in the statement that the numbers have declined in comparison to the numbers of 18th century?

Regards,
Pavan

egmat wrote:
Hi All,

Although beavers can still be found throughout the western United States, their number has declined compared with the eighteenth century, when the abundance of beaver lured armies of European trappers into the Rocky Mountains region to slaughter them for their pelts.

Image

Error Analysis:
1. The sentence presents illogical comparison. The number of beavers has been compared to the eighteenth century.

POE:

Choice A: their number has declined compared with: Incorrect for the reason stated above.

Choice B: their numbers have declined compared with: Incorrect as this choice repeats the same error of Choice A.

Choice C: their numbers have declined since: Correct. Use of “since” clearly conveys the intended meaning of the sentence.

Choice D: their numbers have declined in comparison to those of: Incorrect. “those of” stands for “numbers of”. This again leads to an illogical comparison.

Choice E: the number of them declined since: Incorrect. “the number of them” is not same as “their number”. This choice seems to suggest that beavers had some kind of number that started to decline.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 565
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 75

Re: Although beavers can still be found [#permalink] New post 05 Aug 2012, 08:18
A)their number has declined compared with
number can not be compared with time
B)their numbers have declined compared with
same as (A)
C)their numbers have declined since
CORRECT gives clarity in meaning
D) their numbers have declined in comparison to those of
time period doesn't have numbers to decline
E)the number of them declined since
them is improper pronoun here
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 983
Location: United States
Followers: 93

Kudos [?]: 935 [0], given: 116

Premium Member
Re: Although beavers can still be found throughout the western [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2013, 00:24
Although beavers can still be found throughout the western United States, their number has declined compared with the eighteenth century, when the abundance of beaver lured armies of European trappers into the Rocky Mountains region to slaughter them for their pelts.

A)their number has declined compared with
Wrong. Number vs the eighteenth century

B)their numbers have declined compared with
Wrong. Number vs the eighteenth century

C)their numbers have declined since
Correct. Present perfect tense.

D) their numbers have declined in comparison to those of
Wrong. Number vs the eighteenth century

E)the number of them declined since
Wrong. "The number of them" is incorrect
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 76
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GMAT Date: 01-31-2014
GPA: 3.98
WE: Project Management (Entertainment and Sports)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 14

Re: Although beavers can still be found throughout the western [#permalink] New post 11 Feb 2014, 01:48
Although beavers can still be found throughout the western United States, their number has declined compared with the eighteenth century, when the abundance of beaver lured armies of European trappers into the Rocky Mountains region to slaughter them for their pelts.

A)their number has declined compared with
Illogical comparison: beavers are compared with the eighteen century
B)their numbers have declined compared with
Same as A
C)their numbers have declined since
Hold
D) their numbers have declined in comparison to those of
This is disguised pretty well, we are comparing beavers with the numbers of eighteen century (literally 1800 the digits themselves) that's totally illogical
E)the number of them declined since
them is useless and wrong in this context.
_________________

Either suffer the pain of discipline, or suffer the pain of regret.

If my posts are helping you show some love awarding a kudos

Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 May 2013
Posts: 8
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: Although beavers can still be found [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2014, 06:24
Hi Shraddha,

I do not understand how those of refers to numbers only and not 'numbers of beavers'.

Does D not mean the number of beavers have declined in comparison to the numbers of beavers in the 18th century

egmat wrote:
Choice D: their numbers have declined in comparison to those of: Incorrect. “those of” stands for “numbers of”. This again leads to an illogical comparison.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Oct 2013
Posts: 62
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 5

Re: Although beavers can still be found throughout the western [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2014, 23:03
I think D should have been: ... in comparison to those in..

Because right now, it is: ... in comparison to those of..

So, even if "those" is interpreted as "numbers of beavers", then it would be interpreted as: "numbers of beavers of 18th century". But there is no such thing as "beavers of 18th century"; it should be: "beavers in 18th century".
Re: Although beavers can still be found throughout the western   [#permalink] 12 Mar 2014, 23:03
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts 1 Intercoms are found throughout hospitals so they can quickly lgon 5 31 Aug 2009, 06:13
New posts Once common throughout the Western plains, black-footed noboru 7 01 May 2010, 07:08
New posts 2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Although beavers can still be found throughout the western SOURH7WK 6 27 Oct 2012, 11:38
Popular new posts 3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Although blue herons can still be found along the Maine vishu1414 24 13 Dec 2012, 20:05
Popular new posts 8 Experts publish their posts in the topic Mechanisms for recognizing kin are found throughout the PraPon 20 14 Feb 2013, 00:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Although beavers can still be found throughout the western

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.