Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 04:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 38
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 08-30-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [3] , given: 15

Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2012, 20:05
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (02:24) correct 50% (01:30) wrong based on 191 sessions
Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent critique in the American Neurology Review of Holmes's new popular book of strange but true neurological cases is unjustified. Holmes describes a number of cases of people who lose the ability to speak normally and can only communicate through song. Clancy critiques Holmes' approach as "voyeuristic" and "patronizing," but it is the same approach Holmes applied in all his previous best-selling books, and this latest book is on track to become the top seller of them all.
The argument's reasoning is most open to criticism on the grounds that it:
Choices
A
Attacks Clancy's credentials without any basis.
B
Assumes that if a book is popular, the author's approach must be justifiable.
C
Takes for granted the unlikely proposition that there are some people who can only communicate through song..
D
Attacks the character of the author rather than challenging the validity of the methods used.
E
Assumes that if Holmes' approach was valid for one of his books, it must have been valid for all of his books.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

KUMAR GAURAB
GET MAD ABOUT TEST

Current Student
User avatar
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 648
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 364 [0], given: 23

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Grockit Test 2 CR question (Weaken) [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2012, 20:25
grbjha wrote:
Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent critique in the American Neurology Review of Holmes's new popular book of strange but true neurological cases is unjustified. Holmes describes a number of cases of people who lose the ability to speak normally and can only communicate through song. Clancy critiques Holmes' approach as "voyeuristic" and "patronizing," but it is the same approach Holmes applied in all his previous best-selling books, and this latest book is on track to become the top seller of them all.
The argument's reasoning is most open to criticism on the grounds that it:
Choices
A
Attacks Clancy's credentials without any basis.
B
Assumes that if a book is popular, the author's approach must be justifiable.
C
Takes for granted the unlikely proposition that there are some people who can only communicate through song..
D
Attacks the character of the author rather than challenging the validity of the methods used.
E
Assumes that if Holmes' approach was valid for one of his books, it must have been valid for all of his books.

Good question. Key here is to correctly identify the reasoning presented by the argument.

The argument concludes that Clancy's critique of Holmes' approach used in a book is unjustified because Holmes' is a best selling author and used the same approach in many best selling books.
Clearly the assumption here is if the book is popular any approach is correct.

Ans B it is!

Also, it would be an assumption question rather than a weaken.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!! ;-)
Black Friday Debrief

1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1228
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 66

Kudos [?]: 680 [1] , given: 116

Premium Member
Re: Grockit Test 2 CR question (Weaken) [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2012, 21:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
Conclusion : Clancy's critique that Holmes's approach in his new book is voyeuristic and patronizing is unjustified.
Premise : Holmes has used the same approach in his older books as that in his current book and his current book is on its way to become a top seller. ie. Book is popular.

Assumption that fills the logical gap : It is unjustified to call the approach in a popular book voyeuristic and patronizing.

Of the answer choices given I would say that B is the best option. But IMHO the same answer choice in another set of options could well be wrong. We can see such answer choices especially in RC problems where different parts of the passage are put together to confuse the reader. The argument does not talk about whether the approach used by the author is justifiable or not. It only speaks of whether the critique of the book is justifiable or not. For me a better answer choice would have been something similar to the assumption given above.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 166
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 65 [2] , given: 69

CAT Tests
Re: Grockit Test 2 CR question (Weaken) [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2012, 21:29
2
This post received
KUDOS
Analysis:

Holmes has written many best selling books in the past on neurological cases. All these books are best sellers. He has written latest book in the same series mentions a number of cases of people who lose the ability to speak normally and can only communicate through song.

Clancy, neurologist criticizes Holmes' latest popular book that neurological cases are unjustified. She says Holmes' approach is 'Voyeuristic" and "patronizing".

We need to find the option that weakens Clancy's arguments. Now, Let's check out the options.

A)Attacks Clancy's credentials without any basis. Option is itself without any basis.
B)Assumes that if a book is popular, the author's approach must be justifiable. Yes. If this is true, Statements of Clancy are strongly weakened. It's the answer.
C)Takes for granted the unlikely proposition that there are some people who can only communicate through song. we don't know whether this is true or false.
D)Attacks the character of the author rather than challenging the validity of the methods used. This flaw of reasoning is called as 'Ad Hominem'. 'neurological cases is unjustified' can not be can not be argued by targeting the Holmes.
E)Assumes that if Holmes' approach was valid for one of his books, it must have been valid for all of his books. It seems to be true, but it is not mentioned anywhere that, approach is valid for any of the book.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 May 2012
Posts: 76
Location: United States
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 42 [1] , given: 23

Re: Grockit Test 2 CR question (Weaken) [#permalink] New post 23 May 2013, 05:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
umeshpatil wrote:
Analysis:

Holmes has written many best selling books in the past on neurological cases. All these books are best sellers. He has written latest book in the same series mentions a number of cases of people who lose the ability to speak normally and can only communicate through song.

Clancy, neurologist criticizes Holmes' latest popular book that neurological cases are unjustified. She says Holmes' approach is 'Voyeuristic" and "patronizing".

We need to find the option that weakens Clancy's arguments. Now, Let's check out the options.

A)Attacks Clancy's credentials without any basis. Option is itself without any basis.
B)Assumes that if a book is popular, the author's approach must be justifiable. Yes. If this is true, Statements of Clancy are strongly weakened. It's the answer.
C)Takes for granted the unlikely proposition that there are some people who can only communicate through song. we don't know whether this is true or false.
D)Attacks the character of the author rather than challenging the validity of the methods used. This flaw of reasoning is called as 'Ad Hominem'. 'neurological cases is unjustified' can not be can not be argued by targeting the Holmes.
E)Assumes that if Holmes' approach was valid for one of his books, it must have been valid for all of his books. It seems to be true, but it is not mentioned anywhere that, approach is valid for any of the book.


The answer is B undoubtedly , but you have identified the conclusion incorrectly. The argument doesn't say "Clancy criticizes the book saying neurological cases are unjustified" . But is saying , "Clancy's criticizing Holmes is unjustified".
_________________

Jyothi hosamani

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 May 2012
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 200

Re: Grockit Test 2 CR question (Weaken) [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2013, 10:30
umeshpatil wrote:
Analysis:

Holmes has written many best selling books in the past on neurological cases. All these books are best sellers. He has written latest book in the same series mentions a number of cases of people who lose the ability to speak normally and can only communicate through song.

Clancy, neurologist criticizes Holmes' latest popular book that neurological cases are unjustified. She says Holmes' approach is 'Voyeuristic" and "patronizing".

We need to find the option that weakens Clancy's arguments. Now, Let's check out the options.

A)Attacks Clancy's credentials without any basis. Option is itself without any basis.
B)Assumes that if a book is popular, the author's approach must be justifiable. Yes. If this is true, Statements of Clancy are strongly weakened. It's the answer.
C)Takes for granted the unlikely proposition that there are some people who can only communicate through song. we don't know whether this is true or false.
D)Attacks the character of the author rather than challenging the validity of the methods used. This flaw of reasoning is called as 'Ad Hominem'. 'neurological cases is unjustified' can not be can not be argued by targeting the Holmes.
E)Assumes that if Holmes' approach was valid for one of his books, it must have been valid for all of his books. It seems to be true, but it is not mentioned anywhere that, approach is valid for any of the book.


Yeah Umesh seems like you have hit at the wrong spot by identifying the wrong conclusion ...Here the author is concluding that Clancy critiquing the Holme's book is unjustified ...So we need to weaken this conclusion of the author by finding the option which directly or indirectly says that this criticism by Clancy is not unjustified.....
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1661
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 164 [1] , given: 268

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2014, 09:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
grbjha wrote:
Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent critique in the American Neurology Review of Holmes's new popular book of strange but true neurological cases is unjustified. Holmes describes a number of cases of people who lose the ability to speak normally and can only communicate through song. Clancy critiques Holmes' approach as "voyeuristic" and "patronizing," but it is the same approach Holmes applied in all his previous best-selling books, and this latest book is on track to become the top seller of them all.
The argument's reasoning is most open to criticism on the grounds that it:
Choices
A
Attacks Clancy's credentials without any basis.
B
Assumes that if a book is popular, the author's approach must be justifiable.
C
Takes for granted the unlikely proposition that there are some people who can only communicate through song..
D
Attacks the character of the author rather than challenging the validity of the methods used.
E
Assumes that if Holmes' approach was valid for one of his books, it must have been valid for all of his books.


E is a trap, avoid it

Its not ALL of his books, its only the best sellers we are talking about

B is the best choice here. It assumes that because other best sellers touched upon the same topic then it must be the case that the approach is justifiable

Cheers!
J :)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 May 2013
Posts: 325
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '16, IIMA (M)
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 47

Re: Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2014, 23:01
Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent critique in the American Neurology Review of Holmes's new popular book of strange but true neurological cases is unjustified. Holmes describes a number of cases of people who lose the ability to speak normally and can only communicate through song. Clancy critiques Holmes' approach as "voyeuristic" and "patronizing," but it is the same approach Holmes applied in all his previous best-selling books, and this latest book is on track to become the top seller of them all.
The argument's reasoning is most open to criticism on the grounds that it:
Choices
A
Attacks Clancy's credentials without any basis...did not attack clancy's credentials
B
Assumes that if a book is popular, the author's approach must be justifiable....CORRECT.....CONNECTS CONCLUSION TO PREMISE...
C
Takes for granted the unlikely proposition that there are some people who can only communicate through song......irrelevant....
D

Attacks the character of the author rather than challenging the validity of the methods used....... CHARACTER HAS NOT BEEN CHALLENGED...
E
Assumes that if Holmes' approach was valid for one of his books, it must have been valid for all of his books. ..... INCORRECT....WOULD BE OK IF IT WERE FOR HIS BEST SELLING BOOKS..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 269
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 29

Re: Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2014, 09:23
Going with B.
In the last few lines,the argument says Holmes' approach is valid BECAUSE it has made the books bestsellers/popular.Thats not always/necessarily true.

Posted from my mobile device Image
Re: Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent   [#permalink] 27 Jan 2014, 09:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Although Plato's inspiration for his descriptions of the avohden 2 18 Nov 2013, 13:40
3 Although the recent debate over the efficacy mbaMission 15 13 Jun 2009, 04:57
Although the recent debate over the efficacy of vksunder 3 29 Aug 2008, 07:43
A recent report determined that although only three percent Pauline 0 01 Jan 2007, 22:40
A recent report determined that although only three percent Vithal 0 15 Mar 2005, 06:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Although Clancy is a well-respected neurologist, his recent

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.