Although it claims to delve into political issues, : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 04:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Although it claims to delve into political issues,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 170
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 3

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2010, 02:43
This discussion is very helpful... I had totally missed the "each" rule and selected option A since it seemed well structured.

Now i know why the answer is E... Thanks
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 186
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 11

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2010, 14:39
neeshpal wrote:
Although it claims to delve into political issues, television can be superficial such as when each of the three major networks broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.

(A) superficial such as when each of the three major networks
(B) superficial, as can sometimes occur if all of the three major networks
(C) superficial if the three major networks all
(D) superficial whenever each of the three major networks
(E) superficial, as when the three major networks each

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
E

A and D out for each of the three major networks which is singular
B and C out for IF ...

E is correct as the three major networks each is plural
Manager
Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 65
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 8

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2011, 08:29
Lot of explanations. If rule + Sub Verb agreement - I need to brush up
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 204
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 18

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2011, 21:09
i picked C, but with explanation now convince it should be E. Completely missed the 'if'
Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2011
Posts: 60
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2011, 21:23
E for me...
B,C can be eliminated because use of if changes the meaning by sounding that television will be superficial only when if condition is true..
A can be eliminated because "broadcast" requires usage of a plural noun...
D is eliminated for similar reasons...

Left with E...
Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2010
Posts: 107
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [2] , given: 7

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2011, 07:15
2
This post received
KUDOS
noboru wrote:
Can anybody explain me why E is plural and why C violates "if rule"?

Thanks in advance!

Each when placed before the Subject requires a verb in singular form. But note that Each placed after the Subject has no bearing on the verb form. (MGMAT Guide Book)
Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2010
Posts: 107
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 7

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2011, 07:19
priyankur_saha@ml.com wrote:
neeshpal wrote:
Although it claims to delve into political issues, television can be superficial such as when
each of the three major networks
broadcast exactly the same statement from a political
candidate.

(A) superficial such as when each of the three major networks - singular
-- followed by plural verb "broadcast", so A is wrong
(B) superficial, as can sometimes occur if all of the three major networks
- "if" rule violated
(C) superficial if the three major networks all
- "if" rule violated
(D) superficial whenever each of the three major networks
- Same as A, out
(E) superficial, as when the three major networks each - Plural
- Correct.

Each of the items - singular
Items each - plural
~ Whenever "each" is preceded by noun, verb agrees the number of noun.

What's the rule on IF???
Intern
Joined: 26 Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2011, 07:48
(A) superficial such as when each of the three major networks
(B) superficial, as can sometimes occur if all of the three major networks
(C) superficial if the three major networks all
(D) superficial whenever each of the three major networks
(E) superficial, as when the three major networks each

I think a comma after the word superficial makes the sentence construct better and E is correct
Intern
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 4

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2011, 14:40
seekmba wrote:
Although it claims to delve into political issues, television can be superficial such as when each of the three major networks broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.

(A) superficial such as when each of the three major networks - a plural subject preceded by 'each' or 'every' makes the subject singular. The non-underlined word 'broadcast' suggests that the verb is plural and hence the subject should be plural....hence incorrect

(B) superficial, as can sometimes occur if all of the three major networks

(C) superficial if the three major networks all

(D) superficial whenever each of the three major networks

(E) superficial, as when the three major networks each - when a subject precedes 'each' or 'every' the sentence takes the plural or singular subject (which is before 'each' or 'every') and accordingly has singular or plural verb.

for example:

Each of these shirts is pretty.

They are each great tennis players.

This is all written in page 31 of MGMAT SC book.

I would appreciate if somone can explain how "if" rule is violated in B and C.

Thanks seekmba for your reference. In the latest edition of SC book the page number is 41. I brushed up on 'each' & 'every' singular usage once again.
Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2010
Posts: 107
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 7

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2011, 04:45
We can easily ELIMINATE A and D for the reason that the verb is looking for a plural subject.
We elimate B because it's too wordy and creates the same error in C. See below.
We elimate C because it is using the wrong IF voice.

In the MGMAT there are five patterns to using the IF construct
1) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she BECOMES ill. (General Rule with no uncertainty)
2) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she MAY/CAN BECOME ill. (General Rule with some uncertainty)
3) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she WILL BECOME ill. (Particular case in the future with no uncertainty)
4) IF Sophie ATE pizza tomorrow, THEN she WOULD BECOME ill. (Unlikely case in the future)
5) IF Sophie HAD EATEN pizza yesterday, THEN she WOULD HAVE BECOME ill (case that never happened)

So what make B and C wrong is the USE of IF construct with the TV can be superficial creates an UNCERTAINTY tone. So E is better.

neeshpal wrote:
Although it claims to delve into political issues, television can be superficial such as when each of the three major networks broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.

(A) superficial such as when each of the three major networks
(B) superficial, as can sometimes occur if all of the three major networks
(C) superficial if the three major networks all
(D) superficial whenever each of the three major networks
(E) superficial, as when the three major networks each

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
E
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 127
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 2

Re: Although it claims to delve into political issues, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2012, 16:02
could someone please explain or point me to "if rule violation"

Thanks
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 369
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 31

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2012, 20:29
lawschoolsearcher wrote:
We can easily ELIMINATE A and D for the reason that the verb is looking for a plural subject.
We elimate B because it's too wordy and creates the same error in C. See below.
We elimate C because it is using the wrong IF voice.

In the MGMAT there are five patterns to using the IF construct
1) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she BECOMES ill. (General Rule with no uncertainty)
2) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she MAY/CAN BECOME ill. (General Rule with some uncertainty)
3) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she WILL BECOME ill. (Particular case in the future with no uncertainty)
4) IF Sophie ATE pizza tomorrow, THEN she WOULD BECOME ill. (Unlikely case in the future)
5) IF Sophie HAD EATEN pizza yesterday, THEN she WOULD HAVE BECOME ill (case that never happened)

So what make B and C wrong is the USE of IF construct with the TV can be superficial creates an UNCERTAINTY tone. So E is better.

Are these the only valid constructions in GMAT arena??
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If my reply /analysis is helpful-->please press KUDOS
If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Senior Manager
Status: May The Force Be With Me (D-DAY 15 May 2012)
Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Posts: 289
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 16

Re: Although it claims to delve into political issues, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2012, 20:34
+1 E

This is a really nice question & a bit confusing too.... I was stumped between A & E, but such as is used to illustrate examples hence went with E
_________________

Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.

Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 174
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 24

Re: Although it claims to delve into political issues, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2012, 15:32
C and D are out as they suggest television is superficial (only) if 3 networks ....
A out as subject is not plural, B is wordy
Hence E.
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2012
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 14

Re: Although it claims to delve into political issues, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2012, 05:19
very nice question

brushed up my "each" usage skills and also if rule
Manager
Status: Married
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 65
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 40

Re: Although it claims to delve into political issues, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2012, 09:46
I chose A, but now I see E to be better.....but A..oh! so close....almost
_________________

KUDOS-ing does'nt cost you anything, but might just make someone's day!!!

"Musings of a Muddled Muggle Mind"
http://felinesmile.blogspot.in/
...comments Welcome

Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 191
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: Q V
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 4

Re: Although it claims to delve into political issues, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2012, 12:39
great thanks for the explanation. It's tough catching those "each" as singular and considering it as a noun.
_________________

DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!

Intern
Joined: 02 Feb 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 7

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2012, 13:32
I'm still confused on the usage of "if". When using the conditional "if", one can use modal verbs "can" and "may" in place of the future tense to stress possibility. Since "can be" is part of the non-underline part, uncertainty/possibility is present.

If we rewrite "C": If the three major networks all broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate, television can be superficial. (That makes sense to me.)

If we re-write "E": As when the three major networks each broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate, television can be superficial. (That doesn't make sense to me. Additionally, "as when" sounds awk. Plus the comma after superficial is throwing me off.

lawschoolsearcher wrote:
We can easily ELIMINATE A and D for the reason that the verb is looking for a plural subject.
We elimate B because it's too wordy and creates the same error in C. See below.
We elimate C because it is using the wrong IF voice.

In the MGMAT there are five patterns to using the IF construct
1) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she BECOMES ill. (General Rule with no uncertainty)
2) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she MAY/CAN BECOME ill. (General Rule with some uncertainty)
3) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she WILL BECOME ill. (Particular case in the future with no uncertainty)
4) IF Sophie ATE pizza tomorrow, THEN she WOULD BECOME ill. (Unlikely case in the future)
5) IF Sophie HAD EATEN pizza yesterday, THEN she WOULD HAVE BECOME ill (case that never happened)

So what make B and C wrong is the USE of IF construct with the TV can be superficial creates an UNCERTAINTY tone. So E is better.

neeshpal wrote:
Although it claims to delve into political issues, television can be superficial such as when each of the three major networks broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.

(A) superficial such as when each of the three major networks
(B) superficial, as can sometimes occur if all of the three major networks
(C) superficial if the three major networks all
(D) superficial whenever each of the three major networks
(E) superficial, as when the three major networks each

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
E
Intern
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 47
GMAT 1: 680 Q45 V38
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [1] , given: 7

Re: SC - Television [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2012, 02:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
Thanks to law school researcher for the explanation. If I understood it correctly the problem is the following:

The meaning of the sentence is that "television is (no uncertainty) superficial" in the given situation. But when "if" is used as in B and C, the meaning of sentence changes to "television can be (with some uncertainty) superficial" in the given situation.

E says that "Television can be superficial, for example when the three major networks....". If you turn this around and start with the example you have to write it like this to keep the meaning: "When the three major networks broadcast... , television is superficial".

So we can express the meaning of the sentence in two ways:
In general, television is not superficial, but in situation x it is superficial (ie. television can be superficial).
In situation x television is superficial. (no uncertainty)

If we use "if" as in B and C, we change the meaning of sentence:
In situation x television can be superficial. (uncertain)

I hope its clear.

A side note: The "when" rules out uncertainty, so you can't just replace it with "if" --> always look at the rest of sentence, beacuse sometimes you can chose between the two without changing the meaning (google if and when, there are plenty of explanations).

pitpat wrote:
I'm still confused on the usage of "if". When using the conditional "if", one can use modal verbs "can" and "may" in place of the future tense to stress possibility. Since "can be" is part of the non-underline part, uncertainty/possibility is present.

If we rewrite "C": If the three major networks all broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate, television can be superficial. (That makes sense to me.)

If we re-write "E": As when the three major networks each broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate, television can be superficial. (That doesn't make sense to me. Additionally, "as when" sounds awk. Plus the comma after superficial is throwing me off.

lawschoolsearcher wrote:
We can easily ELIMINATE A and D for the reason that the verb is looking for a plural subject.
We elimate B because it's too wordy and creates the same error in C. See below.
We elimate C because it is using the wrong IF voice.

In the MGMAT there are five patterns to using the IF construct
1) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she BECOMES ill. (General Rule with no uncertainty)
2) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she MAY/CAN BECOME ill. (General Rule with some uncertainty)
3) IF Sophie EATS pizza, THEN she WILL BECOME ill. (Particular case in the future with no uncertainty)
4) IF Sophie ATE pizza tomorrow, THEN she WOULD BECOME ill. (Unlikely case in the future)
5) IF Sophie HAD EATEN pizza yesterday, THEN she WOULD HAVE BECOME ill (case that never happened)

So what make B and C wrong is the USE of IF construct with the TV can be superficial creates an UNCERTAINTY tone. So E is better.
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 132
Location: India
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 372 [0], given: 33

Re: Although it claims to delve into political issues, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2012, 09:52
E

they each plural verb construction.
_________________

Encourage me by pressing the KUDOS if you find my post to be helpful.

Help me win "The One Thing You Wish You Knew - GMAT Club Contest"
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-one-thing-you-wish-you-knew-gmat-club-contest-140358.html#p1130989

Re: Although it claims to delve into political issues,   [#permalink] 01 May 2012, 09:52

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 47 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Although it claims to delve into political issues, 6 23 Oct 2007, 22:26
Although it claims to delve into political issues, 1 24 Jul 2007, 16:56
Although it claims to delve into political issues, 4 22 Jul 2007, 15:31
Although it claims to delve into political issues, 3 10 Mar 2007, 07:38
Although it claims to delve into political issues, 3 04 Feb 2007, 10:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Although it claims to delve into political issues,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.