Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 00:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1092
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 484 [0], given: 0

Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 06:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids a court to consider evidence seized in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights, has unduly hampered law-enforcement efforts. Even when the rights violation was a minor or purely technical one, turning on a detail of procedure rather than on the abrogation of some fundamental liberty, and even when it has been clear that the police officers were acting in good faith, the evidence obtained has been considered tainted under this rule and may not even by introduced. In consequence, defendants who were undoubtedly guilty have been set free, perhaps to steal, rape, or murder again.
5. The author of the passage above assumes all of the following EXCEPT:
(A) The constitutional rights of criminal defendants should be protected.
(B) Most cases in which the exclusionary rule has been invoked have involved purely technical violations of constitutional principles.
(C) The number of cases whose outcome has been affected by the exclusionary rule is significant.
(D) Some of the defendants set free under the exclusionary rule have been guilty of serious criminal offenses.
(E) Merely technical violations of the rules concerning evidence should be treated differently from deliberate assaults upon human rights.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [2] , given: 0

Re: CR 1000 9 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 13:06
2
KUDOS
I think it is C.

the Argument does not anywhere mention the number of cases affected by the exclusionary rule.
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1092
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 484 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000 9 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 20:54
bhatia_ash2002 wrote:
I think it is C.

the Argument does not anywhere mention the number of cases affected by the exclusionary rule.

oa b
Manager
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 1000 9 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 04:51
I dont understand how.
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 206
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 86 [2] , given: 0

Re: CR 1000 9 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 16:19
2
KUDOS
marcodonzelli wrote:
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, which forbids a court to consider evidence seized in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights, has unduly hampered law-enforcement efforts. Even when the rights violation was a minor or purely technical one, turning on a detail of procedure rather than on the abrogation of some fundamental liberty, and even when it has been clear that the police officers were acting in good faith, the evidence obtained has been considered tainted under this rule and may not even by introduced. In consequence, defendants who were undoubtedly guilty have been set free, perhaps to steal, rape, or murder again.
5. The author of the passage above assumes all of the following EXCEPT:
(A) The constitutional rights of criminal defendants should be protected.
(B) Most cases in which the exclusionary rule has been invoked have involved purely technical violations of constitutional principles.
(C) The number of cases whose outcome has been affected by the exclusionary rule is significant.
(D) Some of the defendants set free under the exclusionary rule have been guilty of serious criminal offenses.
(E) Merely technical violations of the rules concerning evidence should be treated differently from deliberate assaults upon human rights.

B, beacuse the author talks about the situation when 'the rights violation was a minor or purely technical one' to illustrate or support his argument. However, nowhere in the passage does he mention the frequency of such cases. Therefore, there is no information to say that he assumed most cases were purely technical.
Manager
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 173
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 33

Re: Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2016, 05:28
Even if I chose option B, I was not able to find an irrefutable reason why option C is an assumption of the passage. It requires me to make a certain assumption on the author's intentions before I can say that it is an assumption of the passage.

Can anyone please give a solid reason why option C is an assumption of the passage?
Re: Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule,   [#permalink] 17 Aug 2016, 05:28
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, 4 14 Mar 2010, 18:56
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, 3 29 Dec 2008, 02:30
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, 3 08 Nov 2008, 03:30
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, 10 12 Jun 2007, 18:28
Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule, 2 16 Mar 2007, 14:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Although its purpose is laudable, the exclusionary rule,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.