Although many 17th century broadsides, popular ballads : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 16:50

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 235
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 234 [1] , given: 25

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2009, 03:35
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:52) correct 43% (02:27) wrong based on 197 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Although many 17th century broadsides, popular ballads printed on a single sheet of paper and widely sold by street peddlers, were moralizing in nature, this is not evidence that most 17th century people were serious about moral values. While over half of surviving broadsides contain moralizing statements, and it is known that many people purchased such compositions, it is not widely known why they did so, nor is it known how their own beliefs related to what they read.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) like other forms of cheap 17th century popular literature, surviving broadsides seem mostly to have been rather low literary quality and to have been written by hack writers.

(B) In many moralizing ballads, the moral content was confined to a single stanza expressing a pious sentiment lacked onto a sensational account of crime and adultery

(C) Some 17th century ballad sellers also sold some sermons printed in pamphlet form

(D) The clergy occasionally stuck broadsides warning about the danger of strong drink on the doors of 17th century alehouses

(E) Well educated people of the 17th century held broadsides in contempt and considered broadside peddlers to be disreputable vagrants
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 64
Schools: Wharton, Kellogg, Duke (Health care management)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2009, 06:39
B
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 27
Schools: HEC,Paris
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2009, 10:17
My Reasoning:
Although many 17th century broadsides, popular ballads printed on a single sheet of paper and widely sold by street peddlers,..................

now why would anyone pay money to read some dreary boring and preachy stuff.
so what if the peddlers were baddies or if the stanzas carried warnings, were written by hacks etc....
scandalous material has a great chance of selling, eh?

so anyway, my answer is B.
Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2009, 10:18
B
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 235
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 234 [1] , given: 25

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2009, 23:33
1
KUDOS
OA is B

Adultery and scandalous elements were attractive then as well
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 261
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 325 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2009, 08:11
Yep should be B..
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Posts: 53
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2009, 13:59
Yeah, OA should be B

If the moralizing sentiment was confined to a single stanza, then it is unlikely it would define the beliefs of the author/buyer of the piece.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 638
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 98

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 80

### Show Tags

12 May 2015, 10:33
Good Question... Bumping up!!
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Current Student
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 307
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 1474

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2015, 20:59
Veritas OA:

Solution: B

This is a Strengthen question, as evidenced by the phrase, “which of the following… most strengthens the argument.” Our first item of business is therefore to identify the conclusion of the author and then look for gaps between the conclusion and the premises. However, the Testmaker has made it difficult to identify the conclusion of the argument. Using the “why?” test to evaluate pieces of the argument help you to determine what the actual conclusion is. Normally, the last sentence in an argument is a prime candidate for the location of the conclusion (in fact, this is what the Testmaker wants you to believe for this particular problem.)

However, looking closer at the argument, it is obvious that the “why” of the last statement is to show that moral broadsides were not evidence most seventeenth-century people were serious about moral values. This is the logical gap: while the assumption exists that most seventeenth- century people purchased broadsides because the broadsides were moralizing, we actually don’t know why they were purchased. The answer choice should plug this logical gap.

Answer choice “A” is a distraction that fails to focus on the logical gap. Regardless of if the broadsides were of low quality, the body of the question indicates they were popular. Answer choice “A” still does not tell us why most seventeenth-century people purchased broadsides.

Answer choice “B” gives us an alternative people purchased reason for broadsides: why the most seventeenth-century moralizing aspect of the broadsides was rather minimal, and they actually “sensationalized” crime and adultery. This helps the author of the argument prove that we can’t assume most people purchased broadsides because the broadsides were moralizing. “B” helps strengthen the argument.

Answer choice “C” is at best irrelevant to the argument (since the original argument focuses on broadsides, not on pamphlet sermons.) At worst, answer choice “C” actually weakens the argument, since buying printed sermons would seem on its face to be evidence that the populace was serious about moral values.

Answer choice “D” focuses on the interests of the clergy, but fails to mind the logical gap. The argument in the body of the question makes a conclusion about “most seventeenth-century people.” Answer choice “D” makes no comment on “most seventeenth-century people,” and concentrates on a small group of people “occasionally” posting moral broadsides on alehouse doors. This cannot help explain the popularity of broadsides sold by street peddlers.

In like manner to answer choice “D”, answer choice “E” also focuses on the interests of a subgroup while failing to mind the logical gap. The argument in the body of the question makes a conclusion about “most seventeenth-century people.” Answer choice “E” makes no comment on “most seventeenth-century people,” and concentrates on only “well- educated people” who steered clear of both broadsides and street peddlers. Naturally, this cannot help explain the popularity of broadsides sold by street peddlers.
_________________

KUDO me plenty

Intern
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 43

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2015, 20:49
zaarathelab wrote:
Although many 17th century broadsides, popular ballads printed on a single sheet of paper and widely sold by street peddlers, were moralizing in nature, this is not evidence that most 17th century people were serious about moral values. While over half of surviving broadsides contain moralizing statements, and it is known that many people purchased such compositions, it is not widely known why they did so, nor is it known how their own beliefs related to what they read.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) like other forms of cheap 17th century popular literature, surviving broadsides seem mostly to have been rather low literary quality and to have been written by hack writers.

(B) In many moralizing ballads, the moral content was confined to a single stanza expressing a pious sentiment lacked onto a sensational account of crime and adultery

(C) Some 17th century ballad sellers also sold some sermons printed in pamphlet form

(D) The clergy occasionally stuck broadsides warning about the danger of strong drink on the doors of 17th century alehouses

(E) Well educated people of the 17th century held broadsides in contempt and considered broadside peddlers to be disreputable vagrants

According to the book, the option B is "In many moralizing ballads, the moral content was confined to a single stanza expressing a pious sentiment tacked onto a sensational account of crime and adultery."
Hope i helped
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2014
Posts: 217
GMAT Date: 08-04-2015
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 75

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2015, 13:40
I cud not understand option B because of 'lacked', a printing error, that made me comprehend the exact opposite meaning. Pls correct the error.
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Economist: Although open-source software has gained popularity in the 2 09 Sep 2014, 04:29
13 Monarchy, a stable form of government for many centuries, 12 30 Jul 2014, 04:15
11 In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many 16 01 Apr 2012, 23:20
18 In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many 16 11 Mar 2010, 19:04
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many 12 03 Jun 2007, 18:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by