Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 26 Oct 2014, 01:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 333
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 193

Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2010, 13:42
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (02:31) correct 38% (01:38) wrong based on 99 sessions
Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests dictate policy in the United States government’s international aid programs, and that such aid is used to support right-wing dictatorships, it is nevertheless true that these programs bring much-needed food and other life giving commodities to destitute, innocent people

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the argument above?

A: The distribution of food and medicines in these foreign countries is always controlled by government officials, who invariably use them for political and personal rewards.

B: Literacy textbooks prepared under the direction of the United States Central Intelligence Agency include lessons on the disadvantages of communism.

C: Most of the food used in these programs is from crops purchased by the American government from American farmers through subsidy programs designed to improve the American economy.

D: In countries that do not receive aid from the United States, thousands die each year from starvation and disease.

E: Governments classified as right wing receive over 78 percent of the total U.S. expenditures for international development programs; governments classified as socialist receive less than 12 percent.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!


Last edited by whiplash2411 on 03 Oct 2010, 16:08, edited 4 times in total.
Formatting Errors Rectified.
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 143
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 29

Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2010, 14:03
I mistakenly narrowed down the answer to C.
3 KUDOS received
Ms. Big Fat Panda
Ms. Big Fat Panda
User avatar
Status: Three Down.
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1879
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Organizational Behavior
Followers: 349

Kudos [?]: 1416 [3] , given: 196

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2010, 16:19
3
This post received
KUDOS
Conclusion: The international aid programs help the destitute people.

shrive555 wrote:
Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests dictate policy in the United States government’s international aid programs, and that such aid is used to support right-wing dictatorships, it is nevertheless true that these programs bring much-needed food and other life giving commodities to destitute, innocent people

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the argument above?

A: The distribution of food and medicines in these foreign countries is always controlled by government officials, who invariably use them for political and personal rewards. This is correct, since it directly weakens the conclusion. If the foreign aid in these countries get controlled by the officials who use them for political rewards, then the aid isn't really going to the destitute people it was meant to help.

B: Literacy textbooks prepared under the direction of the United States Central Intelligence Agency include lessons on the disadvantages of communism. Does this have ANYTHING to do with what's asked? No. Incorrect.

C: Most of the food used in these programs is from crops purchased by the American government from American farmers through subsidy programs designed to improve the American economy. Where the crop comes from is immaterial. We are told that the aid helps the destitute people. Can you say, that just because the crops

D: In countries that do not receive aid from the United States, thousands die each year from starvation and disease. We are not concerned about countries that don't receive aid. Irrelevant.

E: Governments classified as right wing receive over 78 percent of the total U.S. expenditures for international development programs; governments classified as socialist receive less than 12 percent.Aagain, out of scope and irrelevant
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: ISB, Hyderabad
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 176
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 15

Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2010, 19:27
Straight A. I think thats the only option that makes sense.
_________________

-AD

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: it won't happen in one day but it'll happen one day
Joined: 22 May 2010
Posts: 43
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 4

Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2010, 19:51
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the argument above?


hmmm.......its clearly A
it states...these programs bring much-needed food and other life giving commodities to destitute, innocent people...but what if those who control the distribution use them for political and personal gains and it never reaches the needy.It would take the wind out of the argument.
_________________

Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 341
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 14

Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2010, 06:37
This is a weaken question

find the conclusion and then the choice that weakens the conclusion

conclusion:-
it is nevertheless true that these programs bring much-needed food and other life giving commodities to destitute, innocent people

A -The distribution of food and medicines in these foreign countries is always controlled by government officials, who invariably use them for political and personal rewards. directly weakens this conclusions . if the distribution is controlled by officials who use them for personal rewards then this may not be helping innocent people

rest all choices does not weaken the conclusion .
Ans:A
_________________

Always tag your question

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 170
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 3

Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2010, 09:29
A: The distribution of food and medicines in these foreign countries is always controlled by government officials, who invariably use them for political and personal rewards. ==> Correct.

B: Literacy textbooks prepared under the direction of the United States Central Intelligence Agency include lessons on the disadvantages of communism. ==> No effect

C: Most of the food used in these programs is from crops purchased by the American government from American farmers through subsidy programs designed to improve the American economy. ==> Strengthen. Whatever be it, US govt programs bring much-needed food.
D: In countries that do not receive aid from the United States, thousands die each year from starvation and disease. ==> Strengthen

E: Governments classified as right wing receive over 78 percent of the total U.S. expenditures for international development programs; governments classified as socialist receive less than 12 percent. ==> No effect
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 35
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2010, 19:30
A seems correct per your descriptions.

E seems to actual strengthen arguement (does not seem out-of-scope or irrelevant, but supportive of argument)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 159
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 29

Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 21 Dec 2010, 11:35
SJD wrote:
A seems correct per your descriptions.

E seems to actual strengthen arguement (does not seem out-of-scope or irrelevant, but supportive of argument)


So whats the answer Aor E..
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1691
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 300 [0], given: 36

Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2011, 02:17
The answer is A.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 121
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: US goverment [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2011, 18:41
Pretty straight forward.. A..
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2014
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 7

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2014, 07:13
I have a stupid question.

The question asks to weaken the argument and not the conclusion. The argument wouldn´t be that this policy is selfish and helps only dictators?

Should I always go straight to weaken the conclusion in this kind of question, no matter if the question refers to conclusion or argument?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 155
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 22

Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2014, 00:12
Luizonho wrote:
I have a stupid question.

The question asks to weaken the argument and not the conclusion. The argument wouldn´t be that this policy is selfish and helps only dictators?

Should I always go straight to weaken the conclusion in this kind of question, no matter if the question refers to conclusion or argument?




Conclusion is a part of argument, moreover, there is no argument without conclusion. You are right, when you see such questions, go directly conclusion this is what answer choices should weaken or strengthen
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests   [#permalink] 03 Oct 2014, 00:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Received a 700 Today - And I'm bitter, I think Rightfully So Kathmandu2013 7 19 Jul 2014, 09:09
2 Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests d vards 0 02 Jul 2014, 01:21
Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great vineetgupta 5 23 Mar 2007, 09:47
Although it claims Dilshod 4 19 Jul 2005, 00:25
Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great WinWinMBA 7 06 Jun 2005, 11:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.