Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Aug 2014, 20:34

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: May The Force Be With Me (D-DAY 15 May 2012)
Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Posts: 292
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 16

Reviews Badge
Re: Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2012, 00:27
+1 C

Close call between C & E, but choose C
_________________

Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 370
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 31

Re: Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2012, 03:59
C follows correct construction and hence is correct
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If my reply /analysis is helpful-->please press KUDOS
If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 174
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 24

Re: SC-No Proof yet Exists [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2012, 11:00
misterchipper wrote:
Could someone please explain why not B

Thanks


B is out because it actually suggests that there may be no proof of electromagnetic fields which distorts the intention on the author.

C is best in my opinion.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 992
Location: United States
Followers: 112

Kudos [?]: 1113 [0], given: 118

Re: Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2013, 00:20
nitya34 wrote:
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat, mounting scientific evidence has convinced many experts that there is cause for concern.

(A) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat
(B) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances that pose any threat to health
(C) that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health
(D) that poses any threat to health from electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances
(E) for any health threat posed by electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances


C is correct.

(A) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat - WRONG because although + clause, not noun phrase.
(B) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances that pose any threat to health - WRONG because "that" modifies "appliances", --> change meaning
(C) that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health - CORRECT
(D) that poses any threat to health from electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances - WRONG, change meaning, because "that" modifies exists --> doesn't make sense.
(E) for any health threat posed by electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances - WRONG, although + clause, not noun phrase.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 992
Location: United States
Followers: 112

Kudos [?]: 1113 [0], given: 118

Re: Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2013, 14:26
nitya34 wrote:
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat, mounting scientific evidence has convinced many experts that there is cause for concern.

(A) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat
(B) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances that pose any threat to health
(C) that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health
(D) that poses any threat to health from electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances
(E) for any health threat posed by electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances


Although + clause ==> A, E are out.
B is out because of wrong modifier "....household appliances that pose........"
D is out because of wrong modifier "no proof yet exist that poses.............."
C is correct.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Re: Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields   [#permalink] 17 Apr 2013, 14:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields spriya 8 12 Oct 2008, 04:18
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields leeye84 3 06 Jul 2007, 07:56
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields kdhong 5 24 Dec 2005, 19:30
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields Vithal 9 25 Apr 2005, 23:45
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields prep_gmat 8 16 Feb 2005, 20:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.