Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 09:11 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 09:11

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 75 [27]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 356
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [5]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Status:Completed GMAT on 22 Nov 2011
Posts: 64
Own Kudos [?]: 98 [2]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 08 May 2009
Status:There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Posts: 552
Own Kudos [?]: 589 [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
consumer sales = x
after recession = 0.5x

doubling post recession 0.5x *2 = x
but it has not reached pre recession value.
Hence, k*x *2 = x where k <0.5

D is clear here.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Status:<strong>Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.</strong>
Posts: 2279
Own Kudos [?]: 3594 [0]
Given Kudos: 235
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Send PM
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
Awesome question.

"If the market for luxury goods is to return to its original pre-recession state, retailers must offer significant discounts on luxury goods for recession-wary consumers."
=> there is still a gap, which could be filled by giving the discounts.
Even after doubling the sales, the sales have not reached the initial level => the sales actually decreased more than 50% post market crash.

But What is wrong with B?
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Posts: 767
Own Kudos [?]: 3947 [0]
Given Kudos: 109
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT &amp; HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Send PM
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
+1 D

Let's suppose that the sales of luxury goods before recession is 100.
The argument mentions that although the sales after the stock market crash has doubled, the sales has not reached the amount before that crash (100).

In this sense, the sales inmediately after tha crash must has decreased in a 51% or more. If they have decreased in 50% or less, the current sales must be 100 again. Let me illustrate it:

Before the crash: 100
Inmediately after the crash: 50
Recovery: 50 x 2 = 100 again.

D is the winner.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Dec 2012
Posts: 105
Own Kudos [?]: 119 [1]
Given Kudos: 148
Send PM
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
1
Kudos
rojans wrote:
Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately following the stock market crash, sales of such goods have since doubled. If the market for luxury goods is to return to its original pre-recession state, retailers must offer significant discounts on luxury goods for recession-wary consumers.

If the statements above are true, which of the following can be inferred?

A. The increase in luxury purchases can most likely be attributed to recent improvements in the state of the economy.
B. After the stock market crash, consumers were afraid to make major purchases, especially of luxury goods.
C. Retailers of luxury goods are currently offering no discounts on their products.
D. The stock market crash resulted in an over 50 percent decrease in sales of luxury goods.
E. The economy would be more stable if all retailers offered additional discounts on their products during economic recessions.



Luxury goods sharply decreased and double but yet it didnt reach the pre-recession value.
For example -> L.G trading at 100 and during stock crash it falls to 51 and it doubled means its trading at 102 which is Greater than pre-recission value.
hence D is the option. Only when it falls over 50% it shouldnot hav reached the pre recission value.
Current Student
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 221
Own Kudos [?]: 613 [0]
Given Kudos: 111
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 4
WE:General Management (Other)
Send PM
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
rojans wrote:
Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately following the stock market crash, sales of such goods have since doubled. If the market for luxury goods is to return to its original pre-recession state, retailers must offer significant discounts on luxury goods for recession-wary consumers.

If the statements above are true, which of the following can be inferred?

A. The increase in luxury purchases can most likely be attributed to recent improvements in the state of the economy.
B. After the stock market crash, consumers were afraid to make major purchases, especially of luxury goods.
C. Retailers of luxury goods are currently offering no discounts on their products.
D. The stock market crash resulted in an over 50 percent decrease in sales of luxury goods.
E. The economy would be more stable if all retailers offered additional discounts on their products during economic recessions.

I have nothing new to add except that Option C is such an Obvious Trap that you should see it coming from a mile away. :wink:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Posts: 82
Own Kudos [?]: 87 [0]
Given Kudos: 47
Send PM
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
Guys

Can anyone provide a better reasoning why B is wrong? Is B wrong just because D makes more sense? If option D was not in the answer choices then could we still infer B from the argument?

Thanks for the input.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
Rocket7 wrote:
Guys

Can anyone provide a better reasoning why B is wrong? Is B wrong just because D makes more sense? If option D was not in the answer choices then could we still infer B from the argument?

Thanks for the input.


If option D was not in the answer choices, in my opinion option B would still be wrong, the argument does not talk about why people stopped making luxury goods purchases, so one option could be consumers were afraid to make major purchases another option might be they lost the money for luxury goods with the recession or any other reason so option B isn't necessarily true. Therefore, for an inference question to be correct it must be always true, the only option that provides that is option D.

Hope it helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Jun 2020
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
Hi
I have a query regarding option D. Lets say the pre-crash price with 100, after crash it came down to 40 and sales doubled so the price is now 80. But, if the retailer offers significant discount then wouldnt it decrease the price further rather than returning to its original price of 100?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7626 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
Top Contributor
rishabtaneja wrote:
Hi
I have a query regarding option D. Lets say the pre-crash price with 100, after crash it came down to 40 and sales doubled so the price is now 80. But, if the retailer offers significant discount then wouldnt it decrease the price further rather than returning to its original price of 100?


Hi Rishabh

The option (D) assumes a commonly used rule in economics - decrease in price leads to an increase in demand.

Firstly, the question stem does not speak about prices of individual products but of "sales". This could refer to one of two cases:

i) Number of units of luxury products sold (in other words, volume). In this case, reduction in price directly leads to increase in "sales".
ii) Value of products sold. In this case, it is possible that reduction in price leads to disproportionate in volume such that total "sales" increases to pre-recession levels.

In either case, option (D) can be inferred from the facts given in the stimulus.

Hope this clarifies.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
Definitely not a good gmat question answer D can be the option but is not certain

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Although sales of luxury goods sharply decreased immediately [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne