Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 04:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 251
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 29

GMAT Tests User
Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2009, 13:57
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

91% (02:47) correct 9% (02:34) wrong based on 64 sessions
Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written in an alphabet date from the eighth century B.C., the fact that the text of these Greek inscriptions sometimes runs from right to left and sometimes from left to right indicates that the Greeks adopted alphabetic writing at least two centuries before these inscriptions were produced. After all, the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the Phoenicians, and presumably, along with the alphabet, they also adopted the then-current Phoenician practice with respect to the direction of text. And although Phoenician writing was originally inconsistent in direction, by the eighth century B.C. Phoenician was consistently written from right to left and had been for about two centuries.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first and the second each describe evidence that has been used to challenge the position that the argument seeks to establish.
(B) The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is that position.
(C) The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is a consideration that is introduced to counter the force of that evidence.
(D) The first and the second each provide evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish.
(E) The first provides evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is that position.

Other type of this question exists but this is another version. Please explain in a detailed way.Nice explanation will be appreciated with kudos :)) . OA after explanations.

_________________

Please give kudos if you enjoy the explanations that I have given. Thanks :)

3 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 316
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 189 [3] , given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 20 Aug 2009, 01:44
3
This post received
KUDOS
Premise 1: the text of these Greek inscriptions sometimes runs from right to left and sometimes from left to right

Premise 2: the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the Phoenicians, and presumably, along with the alphabet, they also adopted the then-current Phoenician practice with respect to the direction of text

Premise 3: Phoenician writing was originally inconsistent in direction, by the eighth century B.C. Phoenician was consistently written from right to left and had been for about two centuries


Conclusion: the Greeks adopted alphabetic writing at least two centuries before the eight century because they adopted the then-current Phoenician practice with respect to the direction of text and because the Phoenician writing was originally inconsistent in direction.


(A) The first and the second each describe evidence that has been used to challenge the position that the argument seeks to establish.
no, the bold portions support the conclusion.

(B) The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is that position.
no, the first evidence supports the conclusion

(C) The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is a
consideration that is introduced to counter the force of that evidence.
no, the first evidence supports the conclusion

(D) The first and the second each provide evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish.
IMO correct

(E) The first provides evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish; the second is that position.
the second is not the position but rather evidence in support of the position.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2009, 17:54
D is right IMO because both the bold parts are evidences which are used to prove that the position they learnt language two centuries earlier than what those inscriptions suggest ..

_________________

Regards,
Saaquib

If you find any grammatical mistake in my post please don't hesitate in pointing out.

Please +1 if you find this post useful.

My Blog

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 852
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 106

GMAT Tests User
Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2009, 03:03
Can someone explain why the second bold face is not a position but an evidence?

I am not able to see any evidence in the second boldface. It do not tell that the texts or scripts found show something, so how can it be considered evidence?

_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 316
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 189 [1] , given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2009, 04:18
1
This post received
KUDOS
sudeep wrote:
Can someone explain why the second bold face is not a position but an evidence?

I am not able to see any evidence in the second boldface. It do not tell that the texts or scripts found show something, so how can it be considered evidence?


The position is the main point that the author seeks to establish.
In this argument the position that the author tries to convey is that the Greeks adopted alphabetic writing at least two centuries before the eight century.

So "almost" everything that supports that position can be evidence in support of the argument.

The second boldace helps support the argument. It's written in a rebuttal form. First the author accepts minor flaw "Phoenician writing was originally inconsistent in direction" and then concludes with evidence that he wants to show in support of his main point "by the eighth century B.C. Phoenician was consistently written from right to left and had been for about two centuries".

If this does not help, let me know.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 301
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2009, 17:26
going with D as both are facts needed to establish the position that the greeks adopted alphabet from the Phoenicians two centuries before 8century BC
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 51
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2009, 07:38
D seems to be correct.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 171
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 39

GMAT Tests User
Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2009, 23:35
imo - d
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2009
Posts: 59
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 9

Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2009, 00:41
D is fine.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2009, 03:11
IMO D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 59
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 6

Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2009, 06:14
D is the correct answer
The argument here is that the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written in an alphabet date from the eighth century B.C., but it actually dates 2 centuries before that.
both the boldface data together with premise "the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the Phoenicians, and presumably, along with the alphabet, they also adopted the then-current Phoenician practice with respect to the direction of text", prove this fact.
Hence the option should be D,
Even the options, which say a certain statement is a "position" are erroneous since neither of the two are conclusions by themselves. This excludes B,C and E
A is either way erroneous, because both the statements intend to reinforce the argument rather than weaken it
Hence D....
The OA and OE please............
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2009, 07:23
Wts the diffrence b/w argument and position..are these same...pls explain in above context..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 267
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2009, 08:14
IMO D, because of 2 reasons:
(i) both the highlighted portions are evidences and
(ii) they both indicate towards the final position of the author
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 92
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2011, 08:20
D
Re: Greek inscriptions-bold face   [#permalink] 12 Sep 2011, 08:20
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written tuyingjie2012 4 03 Oct 2011, 01:57
2 Although much has been written about the theological rohitgoel15 4 13 Aug 2010, 20:55
Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written dkverma 5 07 Aug 2010, 14:54
Although much has been written about the theological adiraju 1 09 Jul 2009, 03:26
Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written neeshpal 20 06 May 2009, 13:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.