Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 13:46 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 13:46

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 192
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: US
Send PM
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1537 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 899
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NewJersey USA
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 123
Own Kudos [?]: 421 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: illinois
Send PM
Re: Although the number of undergraduates studying engineering [#permalink]
I am going for D although C is a very close contender....

D says that The Engineering enrolment has been increasing MAINLY because the businesses are paying well for them. If they do not pay them well..Then there will NOT be any UNDERGRADS in the FIRST place..FORGET PHD's.....Students would go for a different field....
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 337
Own Kudos [?]: 56 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Send PM
Re: Although the number of undergraduates studying engineering [#permalink]
My reason for choosing D is the same as Monarc's...I second Monarc's explanation.


Vivek.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 380
Own Kudos [?]: 450 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although the number of undergraduates studying engineering [#permalink]
I'm choosing D.


Conclusion: Reduce the salaries for the Undergraduate Engineers.
Reason: If not, the Undergraduates may not have an incentive to
pursue higher education such as PHD; this reason will
cause shortage of teachers.

Anaswer C: Companies pay high salaries to Post graduates.
So what? Is it going to bring in more teacher? may be or May not be

Answer D: Higer demand is the reason for higher salaries.
Can one go against the basic suppy-demand machanism?
No sensible business will do so. They are not
going to reduce the salaries.

Thus, answer D weaken the argument.

Well, again fingers crossed.

Originally posted by kpadma on 06 Apr 2004, 09:12.
Last edited by kpadma on 06 Apr 2004, 09:23, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1537 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although the number of undergraduates studying engineering [#permalink]
I still stand by C.
Conclusion is: "there may be a shortage of engineering teachers in the near future because the number of people receiving PhDs in engineering, those most likely to teach, has not been increasing"
What we are trying to do is weaken the above conclusion. Only C says that the "increase" is not the issue because PhD's salaries are already high
D merely restate the argument in the excerpt:
"This results because the high salaries offered to engineers without advanced degrees reduce the incentive to pursue postgraduate studies"
Compare the above to D and it is an exact restatement and provides nothing to weaken the argument
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 192
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: US
Send PM
Re: Although the number of undergraduates studying engineering [#permalink]
D is the answer and monarc has the best explanation.

This was an LSAT question.
If businesses went with the recommendation, fewer students will enrol in undergraduate engineering courses since the increases were due to higher salaries paid by businesses. In the long run, businesses will suffer from this because it might lead to a shortage of good applicants because even though some applicants may eventually take on PhD's, the pool of undergraduates they'll be teaching will be smaller.

A is irrelevant.

B does not weaken the argument. It helps the premise.

C does not impact the argument. The high salaries would probably tempt people with advanced degrees away from teaching but it doesn't solve the problem of increasing engineering teachers. Even if those without advanced degrees were to go get one, they would probably do so in order to later join the businesses.

E does not impact the argument. It may have helped if research programmes made generous awards to potential students but this is not mentioned.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 192
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: US
Send PM
Re: Although the number of undergraduates studying engineering [#permalink]
Paul,

The main conclusion is:

"Therefore, businesses will have to recognize that their long-term interests would best be served by reducing salaries for those without advanced degrees. "

This is one of those question types that have an intermediate conclusion and a main conclusion.
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 2709
Own Kudos [?]: 1537 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although the number of undergraduates studying engineering [#permalink]
Nice one :roll: I will have to review this problem outside of the work context and give it some more thoughts :). Those LSAT questions are definitely challenging :cool
Keep it up Ndidi204!
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 899
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NewJersey USA
Send PM
Re: Although the number of undergraduates studying engineering [#permalink]
monarc wrote:
I am going for D although C is a very close contender....

D says that The Engineering enrolment has been increasing MAINLY because the businesses are paying well for them. If they do not pay them well..Then there will NOT be any UNDERGRADS in the FIRST place..FORGET PHD's.....Students would go for a different field....


This explanation was the best! :lol:



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Although the number of undergraduates studying engineering [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne