Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 05 Jul 2015, 21:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than

Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 109
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  27 Oct 2009, 05:41
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
tenaman10 wrote:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

B and C change the meaning

requiring ... and spending ... should modify limits medical services

Thus, E is the best
Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 109
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  27 Oct 2009, 05:57
Prometoh wrote:
tenaman10 wrote:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

B and C change the meaning

requiring ... and spending ... should modify limits medical services

Thus, E is the best

Fix it. The answer should be D

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post8323.html
Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 4

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  31 Dec 2009, 07:34
got stucked between C and D.

on one side C. parallels impose, require and spend.

On the other side, D. implies a diferent meaning for the setence. Ie the lower end insurance plan that i) impose stricter limits on medical services and ii) require doctors to see more patiants, and spending ....
Spending is modifying doctor, which seems correct but for me the problem is with "and".
Intern
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 6
Location: Delhi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 5

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  04 Jan 2010, 08:54
1
KUDOS
Option C - Incorrect...lower-end insurance plans that impose..., require.... and spend....you see insurance plans do not spend less time ...so this is an incorrect modification.

Option D - Best IMHO

Option E - Incorrect because....lower-end insurance plans that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spend ('spending' is incorrect)... less time with ...

Cheers,
_________________

D'oh, I slipped on logic!

Manager
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 48 [1] , given: 7

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  04 Jan 2010, 11:44
1
KUDOS
in10sity wrote:
Option C - Incorrect...lower-end insurance plans that impose..., require.... and spend....you see insurance plans do not spend less time ...so this is an incorrect modification.

Option D - Best IMHO

Option E - Incorrect because....lower-end insurance plans that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spend ('spending' is incorrect)... less time with ...

Cheers,

agree with in10sity.

D is the least wrong option
Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 232
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 38

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  18 May 2010, 08:49
aknine wrote:
I would go with option D

A and B are clearly rejected, we are left with C, D and E.
the second part of the sentence gives 2 the features of the insurance plan:
- Imposing stricter limits on medical services
- require doctors to see more patients.
because seeing more patients in less time indicates spending less time with each, we don't need to separate the two by 'and' because they invariably mean the same.
So, the 2 features are separated by 'and' and the following by a comma.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending less time with each.

Nice explanation.

Would A be correct if the comma in "requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend" is removed?

I don't see why "that" is required here.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 231
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 6

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  13 Jun 2010, 01:57
option E is clearly out....because though it seems to be parallel it is actually not.

it would be correct, if it were: requiring doctors to see more patients and to spend less time with each.

"requiring doctors to see....and spending less....." is not parallel in any way.

So D is correct.

The download available for brutal70 has incorrect question. The question discussed here and the one in the download have differing option D. I got it wrong because of that...i just realized
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 231
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 6

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  13 Jun 2010, 02:06
calvinhobbes wrote:
aknine wrote:
I would go with option D

A and B are clearly rejected, we are left with C, D and E.
the second part of the sentence gives 2 the features of the insurance plan:
- Imposing stricter limits on medical services
- require doctors to see more patients.
because seeing more patients in less time indicates spending less time with each, we don't need to separate the two by 'and' because they invariably mean the same.
So, the 2 features are separated by 'and' and the following by a comma.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending less time with each.

Nice explanation.

Would A be correct if the comma in "requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend" is removed?

I don't see why "that" is required here.

Hi,

'That' is required because we are talking about the plan and its effects.
that/which should modify plan here and not the ongoing action or the subject

Therefore,
union member enroll in plans that/which impose

And not

union members enroll in plans imposing...... ==> union members are imposing
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 994
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: [color=#0000FF]Chicago Booth Class of 2015 [/color] - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Retail Banking)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 522 [0], given: 36

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  13 Jun 2010, 02:17
No doubt D yeah

Who wrote SC must be thoroughly convinced with gmat is not easy to kill
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Status: Will Retake GMAT
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 137
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Stanford '13 (D)
GPA: 3.11
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 28

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  23 Sep 2010, 04:43
still not clear....I went with E
_________________

Re-taking GMAT. Hope the charm works this time..

Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  16 Oct 2010, 00:57
papillon86 wrote:
calvinhobbes wrote:
aknine wrote:
I would go with option D

A and B are clearly rejected, we are left with C, D and E.
the second part of the sentence gives 2 the features of the insurance plan:
- Imposing stricter limits on medical services
- require doctors to see more patients.
because seeing more patients in less time indicates spending less time with each, we don't need to separate the two by 'and' because they invariably mean the same.
So, the 2 features are separated by 'and' and the following by a comma.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending less time with each.

Nice explanation.

Would A be correct if the comma in "requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend" is removed?

I don't see why "that" is required here.

Hi,

'That' is required because we are talking about the plan and its effects.
that/which should modify plan here and not the ongoing action or the subject

Therefore,
union member enroll in plans that/which impose

And not

union members enroll in plans imposing...... ==> union members are imposing

Manager, Hi!

Could you, please, help me with this "A" issue. Here is the problem - probably because of my lack of grammar, I don't understand why "imposing stricter limits" can't modify plans. For me, "plans imposing stricter limits and ..." is fine. What plans - plans imposing limits. So the only thing I see wrong about "A" is the comma, but it's not enough. Could you please clarify what I'm getting wrong. You have mentioned that "imposing" modifies "unions", and this comment is probably is the key, but I still don't understand it.
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE(),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 18

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  16 Oct 2010, 02:41
tenaman10 wrote:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

I will go for C.
A and B are eliminated because you need "that" in this clause, otherwise it sounds like its the plans which are imposing thses rules rather than the peopl who came up with these plans.
D is incorrect, because the last part "spending less time with each" is not even a sentence as it misses the verb and the -Ing form itself cannot be used as a verb.
E is incorrect because it is what we call superfiaicial parallelism. Its incorrect because all three parallel elements should have equal weightage, instead of the last two being a subordinatinate to the first one.
C correctly uses "that" to create perfect parallelism.
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 212
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 13

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  23 Nov 2010, 08:00
and I'm really fond of seeing a problem which is 700 level and at the same time sub 600!
which of the following statements best resolves the ....
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1358
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 10

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  02 Dec 2010, 23:02
Option D rules.
Require and spending form a separate sentence alltogether.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 184
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 4

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  01 Jan 2011, 03:49
(D)

(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
_________________

Raptor

Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 184
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 4

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  01 Jan 2011, 03:52
(D)

(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
_________________

Raptor

Senior Manager
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 326
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 398 [0], given: 20

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  21 Jan 2011, 02:30

plans THAT
impose ..
require ..
spend ...

the verbs should be 'logically parallel' and not just simply parallel. impose and require are fine, but what about spend. do plans spend? of course not, spend is not logically parallel.

'plans THAT require doctors to see more patients, spending less time with each'
CORRECT

_________________

press kudos, if you like the explanation, appreciate the effort or encourage people to respond.

Current Student
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 155
Location: United States (TX)
Nationality: Indian
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q V0
GPA: 3.36
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 18

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  14 Feb 2011, 23:27
tejal777 wrote:
Could somebody please explain why exactly is A akward??Stuck between A and D:(

A sounds like insurance plans are "spending less time with each". Note the commas and the 'and' conjunction.
Current Student
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 155
Location: United States (TX)
Nationality: Indian
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q V0
GPA: 3.36
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 18

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  14 Feb 2011, 23:28
I wrongly selected C too. Need to be more careful with parallelism.
_________________

You have to have a darkness...for the dawn to come.

Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2010
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 4

Re: low paid workers [#permalink]  28 Aug 2011, 05:51
papillon86 is correct the download has a different option D so make sure you see the correct option before choosing, E is definitely wrong
Re: low paid workers   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2011, 05:51

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 74 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 17 14 Jul 2008, 08:56
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 5 29 Jun 2008, 07:20
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 1 20 Jul 2007, 08:09
7 Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 13 02 Oct 2006, 20:31
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 17 10 Jun 2006, 16:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by