Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Nov 2014, 18:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [2] , given: 0

Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles. [#permalink] New post 17 Mar 2005, 18:09
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles. He argues that three of them can be identified by the type of design used to form horizontal bands: colored strips, zigzags, or diamonds. The fourth, or bordered, style he identifies by a distinct border surrounding centrally placed, dominating figures.
Amsden believes that the diamond style appeared after 1869 when, under Anglo influence and encouragement, the blanket became a rug with larger designs and bolder lines. The bordered style appeared about 1890, and, Amsden argues, it reflects the greatest number of Anglo influences on the newly emerging rug business. The Anglo desire that anything with a graphic designs have a top, bottom, and border is a cultural preference that the Navajo abhorred, as evidenced, he suggests, by the fact that in early bordered specimens strips of color unexpectedly break through the enclosing pattern.
Amsden argues that the bordered rug represents a radical break with previous styles. He asserts that the border changed the artistic problem facing weavers: a blank area suggests the use of isolated figures, while traditional, banded Navajo designs were continuous and did not use isolated figures. The old patterns alternated horizontal decorative zones in a regular order.
Amsden’s view raises several questions. First, what is involved in altering artistic styles? Some studies suggest that artisans’ motor habits and thought processes must be revised when a style changes precipitously. In the evolution of Navajo weaving, however, no radical revisions in the way articles are produced need be assumed. After all, all weaving subordinates design to the physical limitations created by the process of weaving, which includes creating an edge or border. The habits required to make decorative borders are, therefore, latent and easily brought to the surface.
Second, is the relationship between the banded and bordered styles as simple as Amsden suggests? He assumes that a break in style is a break in psychology. But if style results from constant quests for invention, such stylistic breaks are inevitable. When a style has exhausted the possibilities inherent in its principles, artists cast about for new, but not necessarily alien, principles. Navajo weaving may have reached this turning point prior to 1890.
Third, is there really a significant stylistic gap? Two other styles lie between the banded styles and the bordered styles. They suggest that disintegration of the bands may have altered visual and motor habits and prepared the way for a border filled with separate units. In the Chief White Antelope blanket, dated prior to 1865, ten years before the first Anglo trading post on the Navajo reservation, whole and partial diamonds interrupt the flowing design and become separate forms. Parts of diamonds arranged vertically at each side may be seen to anticipate the border.
1.The author’s central thesis is that

(A) the Navajo rejected the stylistic influences of Anglo culture
(B) Navajo weaving cannot be classified by Amsden’s categories
(C) the Navajo changed their style of weaving because they sought the challenge of new artistic problems
(D) original motor habits and thought processes limit the extent to which a style can be revised
(E) the casual factors leading to the emergence of the bordered style are not as clear-cut as Amsden suggests

[Reveal] Spoiler:
E


2.It can be inferred from the passage that Amsden views the use of “strips of color” in the early bordered style as

(A) a sign of resistance to a change in style
(B) an echo of the diamond style
(C) a feature derived from Anglo culture
(D) an attempt to disintegrate the rigid form of the banded style
(E) a means of differentiating the top of the weaving from the bottom

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A


3.The author’s view of Navajo weaving suggests which one of the following?

(A) The appearance of the first trading post on the Navajo reservation coincided with the appearance of the diamond style.
(B) Traces of thought processes and motor habits of one culture can generally be found in the art of another culture occupying the same period and region.
(C) The bordered style may have developed gradually from the banded style as a result of Navajo experiencing with design.
(D) The influence of Anglo culture was not the only non-Native American influence on Navajo weaving.
(E) Horizontal and vertical rows of diamond forms were transformed by the Navajos into solid lines to create the bordered style.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C


4.According to the passage, Navajo weavings made prior to 1890 typically were characterized by all of the following EXCEPT

(A) repetition of forms
(B) overall patterns
(C) horizontal bands
(D) isolated figures
(E) use of color

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D


5.The author would most probably agree with which one of the following conclusions about the stylistic development of Navajo weaving?

(A) The styles of Navajo weaving changed in response to changes in Navajo motor habits and thought processes.
(B) The zigzag style was the result of stylistic influences from Anglo culture.
(C) Navajo weaving used isolated figures in the beginning, but combined naturalistic and abstract designs in later styles.
(D) Navajo weaving changed gradually from a style in which the entire surface was covered by horizontal bands to one in which central figures dominated the surface.
(E) The styles of Navajo weaving always contained some type of isolated figure.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D


6.The author suggests that Amsden’s claim that borders in Navajo weaving were inspired by Anglo culture could be

(A) conceived as a response to imagined correspondences between Anglo and Navajo art
(B) biased by Amsden’s feelings about Anglo culture
(C) a result of Amsden’s failing to take into account certain aspects of Navajo weaving
(D) based on a limited number of specimens of the styles of Navajo weaving
(E) based on a confusion between the stylistic features of the zigzag and diamond styles

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C


7.The author most probably mentions the Chief White Antelope blanket in order to

(A) establish the credit influence of Anglo culture on the bordered style
(B) cast doubts on the claim that the bordered style arose primarily from Anglo influence
(C) cite an example of a blanket with a central design and no border
(D) suggest that the Anglo influence produced significant changes in the two earliest styles of Navajo weaving
(E) illustrate how the Navajo had exhausted the stylistic possibilities of the diamond style

[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


8.The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) comparing and contrasting different styles
(B) questioning a view of how a style came into being
(C) proposing alternative methods of investigating the evolution of styles
(D) discussing the influence of one culture on another
(E) analyzing the effect of the interaction between two different cultures

[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


Last edited by MacFauz on 19 Mar 2014, 22:34, edited 1 time in total.
Formatting
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Mar 2005, 18:11
Please Paraphrase the Passage also.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2251
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2005, 08:56
It looks like a student's comment on somebody's work about Navajo rugs. Basically A said there are four styles of rugs and the last style or bordered designs respresented an abrupted change in weaver's thought process, which perhaps was influenced by the Anglo culture.
The auther, however, disagrees. He presented three points to counter that claim. First, he argues that borders are natural to weavers and the bordered style only represented a latent habit that was brought to the surface. Second, he suggested that stylistic breaks are inevitable results from artists' constant quest for inventions. Third, he believes that the second and third styles already represented a gradual shift away from the flowing pattern toward a seperate unit pattern.

1. The author’s central thesis is that

(E) the casual factors leading to the emergence of the bordered style are not as clear-cut as Amsden suggests

2. It can be inferred from the passage that Amsden views the use of “strips of colorâ€
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2005, 09:10
Amsden identifies 4 navajo styles and the 4th style, the bordered style in his opinion evolved from the influence of anglo culture. The author cites reasons as to why the bordered style may not be all due to anglo culture but more due to the natural weaving and design practices employed by the Navajo.

EACDDCBB
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2005, 09:17
Re Q6, there is no mention of anglo art in the passage or the imagined correspondence between the two?. Author mentions anglo influences repeatedly but nothing about the anglo art as such, may be i am missing something.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2251
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2005, 09:19
Hmmm you maybe right about 6.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1447
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2005, 10:46
tough choices !

EACDECBB

I was lost in # 5 tho, bet D and E. I just chose E as I cudn't figure out which one might be correct. Can anyone explain #5 ?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Mar 2005, 12:01
:cool OA: EACDDCBB

Thanks everybody for participating. :thanks

I also got most of the questions right but I was not sure about the answers while answering them. Probably, I had not paraphrased the passage properly.



banerjeea_98 wrote:
Can anyone explain #5 ?

Blue : to refute choice (E)
Green : to establish choice (D)

jpv wrote:
Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles. He argues that three of them can be identified by the type of design used to form horizontal bands: colored strips, zigzags, or diamonds. The fourth, or bordered, style he identifies by a distinct border surrounding centrally placed, dominating figures.
Amsden believes that the diamond style appeared after 1869 when, under Anglo influence and encouragement, the blanket became a rug with larger designs and bolder lines. The bordered style appeared about 1890, and, Amsden argues, it reflects the greatest number of Anglo influences on the newly emerging rug business. The Anglo desire that anything with a graphic designs have a top, bottom, and border is a cultural preference that the Navajo abhorred, as evidenced, he suggests, by the fact that in early bordered specimens (line 18) strips of color unexpectedly break through the enclosing pattern.
Amsden argues that the bordered rug represents a radical break with previous styles. He asserts that the border changed the artistic problem facing weavers: a blank area suggests the use of isolated figures, while traditional, banded Navajo designs were continuous and did not use isolated figures. The old patterns alternated horizontal decorative zones in a regular order.
Amsden’s view raises several questions. First, what is involved in altering artistic styles? Some studies suggest that artisans’ motor habits and thought processes must be revised when a style changes precipitously. In the evolution of Navajo weaving, however, no radical revisions in the way articles are produced need be assumed. After all, all weaving subordinates design to the physical limitations created by the process of weaving, which includes creating an edge or border. The habits required to make decorative borders are, therefore, latent and easily brought to the surface.
Second, is the relationship between the banded and bordered styles as simple as Amsden suggests? He assumes that a break in style is a break in psychology. But if style results from constant quests for invention, such stylistic breaks are inevitable. When a style has exhausted the possibilities inherent in its principles, artists cast about for new, but not necessarily alien, principles. Navajo weaving may have reached this turning point prior to 1890.
Third, is there really a significant stylistic gap? Two other styles lie between the banded styles and the bordered styles. They suggest that disintegration of the bands may have altered visual and motor habits and prepared the way for a border filled with separate units. In the Chief White Antelope blanket, dated prior to 1865, ten years before the first Anglo trading post on the Navajo reservation, whole and partial diamonds interrupt the flowing design and become separate forms. Parts of diamonds arranged vertically at each side may be seen to anticipate the border.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Mar 2005, 13:31
The stuff in 'green'in jpv's msg is what Amsden believes and not the author. The question is asking for:
5. The author would most probably agree with which one of the following conclusions about the stylistic development of Navajo weaving?

Evidence to support D by the author is provided in the last paragraph of the passage. This is an inference question and the flow of the passage gives clues as well to picking D. E ruled out because of distortion and Q4 already tested this aspect in that isolated figures were not part of the navajo art prior to 1890, so 'always' in E is not something that the author would agree with.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 394
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: RC - Weaving [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2005, 01:46
Guys..my answers are
1-E
2-D
3-C
4-D
5-D
6-C
7-B
8-B

I could note that (2) is wrong.

Could somebody explain that?

jpv wrote:
Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles. He argues that three of them can be identified by the type of design used to form horizontal bands: colored strips, zigzags, or diamonds. The fourth, or bordered, style he identifies by a distinct border surrounding centrally placed, dominating figures.
Amsden believes that the diamond style appeared after 1869 when, under Anglo influence and encouragement, the blanket became a rug with larger designs and bolder lines. The bordered style appeared about 1890, and, Amsden argues, it reflects the greatest number of Anglo influences on the newly emerging rug business. The Anglo desire that anything with a graphic designs have a top, bottom, and border is a cultural preference that the Navajo abhorred, as evidenced, he suggests, by the fact that in early bordered specimens (line 18) strips of color unexpectedly break through the enclosing pattern.
Amsden argues that the bordered rug represents a radical break with previous styles. He asserts that the border changed the artistic problem facing weavers: a blank area suggests the use of isolated figures, while traditional, banded Navajo designs were continuous and did not use isolated figures. The old patterns alternated horizontal decorative zones in a regular order.
Amsden’s view raises several questions. First, what is involved in altering artistic styles? Some studies suggest that artisans’ motor habits and thought processes must be revised when a style changes precipitously. In the evolution of Navajo weaving, however, no radical revisions in the way articles are produced need be assumed. After all, all weaving subordinates design to the physical limitations created by the process of weaving, which includes creating an edge or border. The habits required to make decorative borders are, therefore, latent and easily brought to the surface.
Second, is the relationship between the banded and bordered styles as simple as Amsden suggests? He assumes that a break in style is a break in psychology. But if style results from constant quests for invention, such stylistic breaks are inevitable. When a style has exhausted the possibilities inherent in its principles, artists cast about for new, but not necessarily alien, principles. Navajo weaving may have reached this turning point prior to 1890.
Third, is there really a significant stylistic gap? Two other styles lie between the banded styles and the bordered styles. They suggest that disintegration of the bands may have altered visual and motor habits and prepared the way for a border filled with separate units. In the Chief White Antelope blanket, dated prior to 1865, ten years before the first Anglo trading post on the Navajo reservation, whole and partial diamonds interrupt the flowing design and become separate forms. Parts of diamonds arranged vertically at each side may be seen to anticipate the border.

_________________

Awaiting response,

Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra

1 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1227
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 70

Kudos [?]: 745 [1] , given: 116

Premium Member
Re: Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles. [#permalink] New post 19 Mar 2014, 23:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Re: Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles.   [#permalink] 19 Mar 2014, 23:08
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles. Legendaddy 1 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles. lahoosaher 8 25 Sep 2009, 04:23
Decision makers tend to have distinctive styles. One such AK47 5 12 Jan 2007, 20:11
There are four distinct pair of brothers and sisteres. In pawan82 4 10 Nov 2006, 04:25
There are four distinct pairs of brothers and sisters. In GMATPsycho 7 12 Jun 2006, 23:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.