Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Jul 2014, 22:49

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 308
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills [#permalink] New post 25 Jun 2009, 03:16
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

67% (01:57) correct 33% (01:35) wrong based on 10 sessions
An advertisements states:
Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.
Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved, but Jane’s will not.
(B) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane’s.
(C) Evelyn’s headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane’s.
(D) Jane’s headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn’s.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.
_________________

"CEO in making"

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 852
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 106

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 25 Jun 2009, 06:04
B it is.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 172
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 25 Jun 2009, 17:08
tenaman10 wrote:
An advertisements states:
Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.
Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved, but Jane’s will not.
(B) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane’s.
(C) Evelyn’s headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane’s.
(D) Jane’s headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn’s.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.


I would say (C). Assuming the ad is completely true, then no other pill works quicker than Danaxil, but it is possible that a competing pill works AS FAST AS this one.

Translated into math terms, this is the difference between 'less than' and 'less than OR EQUAL TO', and the latter is the inequality being used in the ad. (C) conforms to this inequality better than B does, since it covers the 'OR EQUAL TO' possibility.

As for the other answers, well, they're all obvious distractions.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 70
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 25 Jun 2009, 22:13
GMATaddict wrote:
tenaman10 wrote:
An advertisements states:
Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.
Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved, but Jane’s will not.
(B) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane’s.
(C) Evelyn’s headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane’s.
(D) Jane’s headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn’s.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.


I would say (C). Assuming the ad is completely true, then no other pill works quicker than Danaxil, but it is possible that a competing pill works AS FAST AS this one.

Translated into math terms, this is the difference between 'less than' and 'less than OR EQUAL TO', and the latter is the inequality being used in the ad. (C) conforms to this inequality better than B does, since it covers the 'OR EQUAL TO' possibility.

As for the other answers, well, they're all obvious distractions.


at least as quickly as Jane's (or longer than that)

it says that the minimum time that Danaxil will take to cure the headache equals the time Danaxil's competitors take or more than that, which is against the ad
_________________

Is this okay?

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 May 2009
Posts: 116
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 11

Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 26 Jun 2009, 08:23
GMATaddict wrote:
tenaman10 wrote:
An advertisements states:
Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.
Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved, but Jane’s will not.
(B) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane’s.
(C) Evelyn’s headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane’s.
(D) Jane’s headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn’s.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.


I would say (C). Assuming the ad is completely true, then no other pill works quicker than Danaxil, but it is possible that a competing pill works AS FAST AS this one.

Translated into math terms, this is the difference between 'less than' and 'less than OR EQUAL TO', and the latter is the inequality being used in the ad. (C) conforms to this inequality better than B does, since it covers the 'OR EQUAL TO' possibility.

As for the other answers, well, they're all obvious distractions.



Agree with you, however if we closely look at this clause in the ad, "no headache pill stops pain more quickly", that means Danaxil is faster than others and no one can match its speed to relieve the pain.

So, in this case B looks a better bet.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 172
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2009, 10:29
Wait... I'm not convinced...

No pill is MORE quick than pill "D". So here is what I'm envisioning as an example:

Pill W: takes 3 min to start working.
Pill X: 3.1 min.
Pill Y: 4 min.
Pill Z: 1 hour.

Pill D: 3 min.

This scenario still satisfies the condition that no pill works MORE quickly, but we CANNOT say pill D works FASTER than pill W; 3 min is NOT faster than 3 min.

Is there an OA available?

Last edited by GMATaddict on 27 Jun 2009, 21:24, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 108
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2009, 15:43
I'm with B.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 May 2009
Posts: 116
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 11

Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2009, 21:12
hmm...could we have the OA please?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 172
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2009, 21:21
An official explanation would be nice as well. It seems the consensus is on (B), although I'm not at all convinced.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 308
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2009, 09:08
B is a trap ..
OA :C
hasham222 wrote:
GMATaddict wrote:
tenaman10 wrote:
An advertisements states:
Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.
Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved, but Jane’s will not.
(B) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane’s.
(C) Evelyn’s headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane’s.
(D) Jane’s headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn’s.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.


I would say (C). Assuming the ad is completely true, then no other pill works quicker than Danaxil, but it is possible that a competing pill works AS FAST AS this one.

Translated into math terms, this is the difference between 'less than' and 'less than OR EQUAL TO', and the latter is the inequality being used in the ad. (C) conforms to this inequality better than B does, since it covers the 'OR EQUAL TO' possibility.

As for the other answers, well, they're all obvious distractions.



Agree with you, however if we closely look at this clause in the ad, "no headache pill stops pain more quickly", that means Danaxil is faster than others and no one can match its speed to relieve the pain.

So, in this case B looks a better bet.

_________________

"CEO in making"

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 161
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2009, 04:54
The answer should be (C).
What is the OA?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 99

GMAT Tests User
Re: LSAT - Subtle difference in Ans choices [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2009, 06:06
tenaman10 wrote:
An advertisements states:
Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.
Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved, but Jane’s will not.
(B) Evelyn’s headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane’s.
(C) Evelyn’s headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane’s.
(D) Jane’s headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn’s.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.


I think this is C.

"Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly" tell you that no other pill stops quicker than danaxil but they can stop as quickly as danaxil (underlined meaning).
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 310
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V23
GMAT 2: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 141

Re: An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2013, 23:26
C is the OA. I couldn't agree more.

OE:
Like all good advertising pitches, this one appears to claim more than it actually does. The key to
answering this question is the sentence “Danaxil is for you—no headache pill stops pain more quickly.” In
other words, Danaxil is at least as fast as any other headache pill. So Evelyn’s headache will be relieved at
least as quickly as Jane’s. The answer is (C). Choice (B) overstates the case. The advertisement doesn’t
say that Danaxil stops headache pain more quickly than any other medicine, just that no other medication is
faster.
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire


Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

shit-happens-my-journey-to-172475.html#p1372807

Re: An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills   [#permalink] 05 Jun 2013, 23:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills AK47 9 16 Jan 2007, 22:15
An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills sushom101 7 26 Oct 2005, 03:53
An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills WinWinMBA 4 09 May 2005, 16:04
An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills chunjuwu 1 03 Oct 2004, 18:13
Experts publish their posts in the topic An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills Geethu 17 18 Aug 2004, 08:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

An advertisements states: Like Danaxil, all headache pills

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.