Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Aug 2014, 17:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

An artist must suffer for his art say these successful

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 152
Location: Montreal
Schools: Harvard, Yale, HEC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 18

An artist must suffer for his art say these successful [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 07:07
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

53% (02:21) correct 47% (01:12) wrong based on 32 sessions
1. An artist must suffer for his art say
these successful entrepreneurs who attempt
to pass themselves off as artists.
They auction off to the highest bidder,
usually a fool in his own right, the most
mediocre of drawings; and then, from
their well-laid tables, they have the unmitigated
gall to imply that they themselves
_____________.
Choose the answer that best completes
the paragraph.
(A) are connoisseurs of art
(B) suffer deprivation for the sake of their
work
(C) are artists
(D) know art better than the art critics do
(E) do not enjoy a good meal

2. Having just completed Introductory
Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct
others in the intricacies of this wonderful
discipline. Logic is concerned with
correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms.
A syllogism consists of three
statements, two of which are premises,
the third of which is the conclusion.
Here is an example:
MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is
disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is an American
buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is
disappearing.
Once one has been indoctrinated into
the mysteries of this arcane science, there
is no statement one may not assert with
complete confidence.

The main purpose of the author’s argument
is to
(A) provide instruction in logic
(B) supply a definition
(C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic
(D) present an argument for the protection
of the American buffalo
(E) show the precise relationship between
the premises and the conclusion of
his example
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 228
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: lets discuss [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 09:28
Question 1. “They auction off to the highest bidder the most mediocre of drawings”. This statement implies the judgmental power or lack of it of entrepreneurs.

A person who judges fine art is connoisseurs

So IMO the answer is A.

Question 2. I presume the author is supply the definition of syllogism

So the answer is B
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 155
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Re: lets discuss [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 11:39
1-A
2-B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 152
Location: Montreal
Schools: Harvard, Yale, HEC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 18

Re: lets discuss [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 13:35
keep going everybody, i will post official answers & explanations, which I think will subject to debate, tomorrow.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: lets discuss [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2009, 16:19
1. B
2.A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: lets discuss [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2009, 02:29
A
A
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 152
Location: Montreal
Schools: Harvard, Yale, HEC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 18

Re: lets discuss [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2009, 09:25
1. The correct answer is (B). The author is accusing the artists of being inconsistent,
claiming that they give lip service to the idea that an artist must suffer, but that
they then live in material comfort so they do not themselves suffer. Only (B) completes
the paragraph in a way so that this inconsistency comes out. (A) and (D) can be
dismissed because the author is attacking artists, not connoisseurs or purchasers of
art, nor critics of art. (C) is inadequate, for it does not reveal the inconsistency. The
author apparently allows that these people are, after a fashion, artists, but objects to
their claiming that it is necessary to suffer while they do not themselves suffer. (E) is
the second best answer, but it fails, too. The difficulty with (E) is that the author’s point
is that there is a contradiction between the actions and the words of artists: They claim
to suffer but they do not. But the claimed suffering goes beyond matters of eating and
has to do with deprivation generally.

2. The correct answer is (E). The sample syllogism uses its terms in an ambiguous
way. In the first premise, the category “American buffalo” is used to refer to the
group as a whole, but in the second premise it is used to denote a particular
member of that group. In the first premise, “disappearing” refers to extinction of a
group, but in the second premise “disappearing” apparently means fading from
view. (E) is fraught with similar ambiguities. The argument there moves from
wealthy people as a group to a particular wealthy person, an illegitimate shifting
of terminology. (A) is a distraction. It mentions subject matter similar to that
of the question stem, but our task is to parallel the form of the argument, not to find an
argument on a similar topic. (A), incidentally, is an unambiguous and valid
argument. So too is (B), and a moment’s reflection will reveal that it is very similar
to (A). (C) is not similar to (A) and (B), but then again it is not parallel to the
question stem. (C) contains circular reasoning the very thing to be proved had
to be assumed in the first place but while circular reasoning is incorrect reasoning,
it does not parallel the error committed by the question stem: ambiguity.
(D) is clearly a correct argument, so it cannot be parallel to the question stem,
which contains a fallacious argument.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Yeah well whatever.
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 347
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE: Analyst (Insurance)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Re: lets discuss [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2009, 14:04
Let's discuss.

ezinis wrote:
1. The correct answer is (B). The author is accusing the artists of being inconsistent,
claiming that they give lip service to the idea that an artist must suffer, but that
they then live in material comfort so they do not themselves suffer. Only (B) completes
the paragraph in a way so that this inconsistency comes out. (A) and (D) can be
dismissed because the author is attacking artists, not connoisseurs or purchasers of
art, nor critics of art. (C) is inadequate, for it does not reveal the inconsistency. The
author apparently allows that these people are, after a fashion, artists, but objects to
their claiming that it is necessary to suffer while they do not themselves suffer. (E) is
the second best answer, but it fails, too. The difficulty with (E) is that the author’s point
is that there is a contradiction between the actions and the words of artists: They claim
to suffer but they do not. But the claimed suffering goes beyond matters of eating and
has to do with deprivation generally.

2. The correct answer is (E). The sample syllogism uses its terms in an ambiguous
way. In the first premise, the category “American buffalo” is used to refer to the
group as a whole, but in the second premise it is used to denote a particular
member of that group. In the first premise, “disappearing” refers to extinction of a
group, but in the second premise “disappearing” apparently means fading from
view. (E) is fraught with similar ambiguities. The argument there moves from
wealthy people as a group to a particular wealthy person, an illegitimate shifting
of terminology. (A) is a distraction. It mentions subject matter similar to that
of the question stem, but our task is to parallel the form of the argument, not to find an
argument on a similar topic. (A), incidentally, is an unambiguous and valid
argument. So too is (B), and a moment’s reflection will reveal that it is very similar
to (A). (C) is not similar to (A) and (B), but then again it is not parallel to the
question stem. (C) contains circular reasoning the very thing to be proved had
to be assumed in the first place but while circular reasoning is incorrect reasoning,
it does not parallel the error committed by the question stem: ambiguity.
(D) is clearly a correct argument, so it cannot be parallel to the question stem,
which contains a fallacious argument.


I got B for number 1 after reading it a few times it was the only one that made sense. But your explanation for number 2 mentions things that aren't even in the question. Where does "the argument there move from
wealthy people as a group to a particular wealthy person" for A? It looks like it's the OA from another question using the same passage. Am I crazy?
_________________

He that is in me > he that is in the world. - source 1 John 4:4

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 152
Location: Montreal
Schools: Harvard, Yale, HEC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 18

Re: lets discuss [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2009, 14:22
The explanations I posted above are from ARCO. They drive me crazy too. That's why I want to look for another opinion.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 13

Re: An artist must suffer for his art say these successful [#permalink] New post 30 May 2014, 21:11
I know that I am 4 1/2 years late in joining this discussion but I must say, 2 very good questions.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 68
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 18

Re: An artist must suffer for his art say these successful [#permalink] New post 17 Aug 2014, 18:01
I can't understand why B is wrong for the second one; can't figure out decide B & E; only a little more inclined towards B (apparently the wrong answer :()
Experts, could you please help here?

2. Having just completed Introductory Logic 9, I feel competent to instruct others in the intricacies of this wonderful discipline. Logic is concerned with correct reasoning in the form of syllogisms. A syllogism consists of three statements, two of which are premises, the third of which is the conclusion. Here is an example:
MAJOR PREMISE: The American buffalo is disappearing.
MINOR PREMISE: This animal is an American buffalo.
CONCLUSION: Therefore, this animal is disappearing.
Once one has been indoctrinated into the mysteries of this arcane science, there is no statement one may not assert with complete confidence.

The main purpose of the author’s argument is to
(A) provide instruction in logic
(B) supply a definition
(C) cast doubt on the value of formal logic
(D) present an argument for the protection of the American buffalo
(E) show the precise relationship between the premises and the conclusion of his example
Re: An artist must suffer for his art say these successful   [#permalink] 17 Aug 2014, 18:01
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Cezanne's art inspired the next generation of artists, getgyan 4 19 Sep 2012, 02:25
1 C zanne s art inspired the next generation of artists, joshnsit 12 07 Feb 2012, 20:45
Having discovered the gifted artist Thomas to be suffering bmwhype2 4 08 Aug 2007, 09:34
C zanne s art inspired the next generation of artists, vshaunak@gmail.com 10 03 Jul 2007, 02:06
Cezanne's art inspired the next generation of artists, laxieqv 17 06 Oct 2006, 19:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

An artist must suffer for his art say these successful

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.